 |
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
From: SPAMJAMR <Letzta...@aol.com>
Date: 9 Aug 2004 22:54:48 -0700
Local: Tues, Aug 10 2004 1:54 am
Subject: Re: SUCCESS!
In article <2f0f6d90.0408061546.7fd0b...@posting.google.com>, Sun Tsu says...
>"Anonymous" <Anonym...@domain.invalid> wrote in message >> You stop spamming our domain, I'll stop hitting your spamvertised websites. Didn't you do that in this very thread? >> That's the deal. No negotiations. >Have you no shame, Bob, following up your own post in NANAE. [snip] >What is your domain anyway? You mean you missed it? >It shouldn't be a problem mentioning it Stan Fischer has more than this block. >if spammy already knows what it is. You keep referring to "we" and if >you have partners in this one lone website. Do you perhaps have a >frog in your pocket? >You are posting from, >NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.207.207.234 >Pac Bell Internet Services PBI-NET-7 (NET-63-192-0-0-1) >STAN FISHER SBCIS-100531-182148 (NET-63-207-207-232-1) >So, Stan, why do you also go by the name of Bob and what do you need 8 How does this prove his name is Stan? Are you implying that only spammers use >IP's for if you only have one website? more than one IP, or that having more than one IP makes one suspect of being a spammer? [snip] >Hmm, you've had this /29 for four years and you've just started Yeah, right. Have any evidence to believe he did? >posting in NANAE sounding like either a tenured regular or a tenured >spammer. Bob, did you hijack this IP block from Stan? >Your posting IP resolves to 151.164.243.21 What? A posting IP "resolves" to another IP? Ridiculous. > 60 ms 70 ms 84 ms 64.200.89.70 All you have is a backbone router that appears in many Google articles including I ran that traceroute from several different locations and never went through 9 66.185.136.2 54ms 48ms 48ms TTL: 0 (SBC.atdn.net bogus rDNS: host >:::: or are you this spammer? :::: ROFL. That backbione router leads to lots of places. Care to show step by step > Google Search: 151.164.243.21 >http://groups.google.com/groups?q=151.164.243.21&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&s... >:::: which leads to :::: >Registrant: > Domain Name: THEANSWERTO.COM how you arrived at this conclusion? >Monteforte, Patrick &amp; Tracy gtp...@northcoast.com [snip] ><http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=2f0f6d90.0...> WTF does being new to nanae have to do with knowledge of those things. I know a >> Ok, I'm new here, so I'm not familiar with the language, and these may be >Say what? You're new here? Oh, really! >If you are new here then why do you know so much about whois, LARTing, lot of admins that have never set foot in nanae. What kind of evidence do you call this? >Let's have a look and see if it's you and examine some of the cr@p you Geez, ya think he could have learned elsewhere? Nanae was not the first place I >have been spewing in NANAE the last few days. Seems you have been >having a bit of a go with the good folks in NANAE. >Google Search: author:Anonym...@domain.invalid ><http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=author:Anonymous...> >It would appear that you know a great deal about spammers and fighting started learning. [snip] >> Man, you'd be amazed at how many people are using the email address of Because it would never get delivered? >> 'anonym...@domain.invalid'. No wonder I get so much spam... I've got >> Sanford Wallace AND Scott Richter right in my Inbox! >Why would someone as "clued" as you use such an address then, hmm, >You do realise that most people don't know If they are one in tha same whats the difference? You may be arguing over >that InterCosmos.com is DirectNIC.com and that ab...@DirectNIC.com >uses a DirectNIC email address, not an InterCosmos.com address, don't >you, Bob? How about you post some of the email, along with headers >adnd responses, you have been sending (sic) to DirectNic.com >concerning this Russian spam gang. semantics. [snip] >:: Re: Spam Surge? It would be interesting to know how you tied them together. >> Yes, our rolling monthly spam receival rate went from >Make up your mind, Bob, is it 100% or 93% ? >And, Bob, we? Do you have a frog in your pocket or are you talking >Hmm, let's see, Phil Doroff of SPEWS S2134 is suspect in some of those Are you claiming he is associated with Doroff? Care to show your verifiable >DDoS attacks as was a Russian spam gang. Now here you are in NANAE >thumping yo' little chest and alerting the entire world how successful >a spam fighter you are, "facts". [snip] >Correction, bfs isn't your sock puppet, it's *you* Bob Proof? [massive snip] >:: Strike back against the spammers... [snip] >:::: <quote> :::: >Hi, all. >Hmm, there's that, "Hi, all" again that your other socks used to set Hmmm...216,000 hits in nana* for "Hi, All". Now thats rock hard evidence. >up some of your responses. >Bob, you are either a mortgage spammer yourself or you support, or I havent seen you prove this yet. After that wild leap with claiming his posting >have a vested interest in, the mortgage spam industry. Tell us (tinu) >the truth, Bob, you're here with a hidden agenda, "orangeja?" host resolves to a backbone router IP, and not showing how you associated Bob, or Stan Fisher to THEANSWERTO.COM, I am inclined to not to believe your at best circumstancial evidence. -- Paging Snotty Richter, please pick up the red "You're Fucked Now" phone. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||