Received: by 10.180.95.2 with SMTP id dg2mr883469wib.2.1346956415606;
        Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Path: ed8ni849522wib.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.138.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!cyclone02.ams2.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!News.Dal.Ca!news.litech.org!news.glorb.com!news-spur2.glorb.com!homer.glorb.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "WindsorFox<SS>" <windsor.fox.use...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Subject: Re: BULLETIN: Just due! ?
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:04:08 -0500
Organization: Glorb Internet Services, http://www.glorb.com
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <k239iv$aqf$1@posting2.glorb.com>
References: <9fc414f6-3db7-46ba-954b-9152e192b0f2@kr6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <33e525ae-ffba-42b7-a9f2-624c8d80abbb@x3g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <k1glmb$h69$1@posting2.glorb.com> <slrnk3orni.c60.john@proxy.spampig.org.uk> <k1iqgu$ljn$1@posting2.glorb.com> <k1oms0$3d7$1@posting2.glorb.com> <slrnk43ihm.71r.john@proxy.spampig.org.uk> <k1tap0$dct$1@posting2.glorb.com> <slrnk46cfl.8m0.john@proxy.spampig.org.uk> <k1vtom$47b$1@posting2.glorb.com> <slrnk4a4ug.ltm.john@proxy.spampig.org.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fXwYxTYJULhzMKAgmrCcuA.user.posting2.glorb.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@glorb.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 22:05:19 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
X-Notice: Scanned by Mr. Bill
Bytes: 2099
X-Received-Bytes: 2199
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 9/3/2012 15:32, John Doe wrote:
> On 2012-09-02, WindsorFox<SS> <windsor.fox.use...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You can label anyone you want as a coward, that does not make it
>> so as you post from under your blanket.
>
> But *you* are a coward, and you have an unhealthy interest
> in sex with children.
>


    You have shown zero evidence of either despite being asked by a 
number of people on several occasions. It seems your only recourse is to 
blindly quote another coward. If you are this groups savior of a spam 
fighter, what is it exactly the you perceive that I've done to warrant 
your bashing me with false accusations?