|
 |
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
From: bananana...@spamblocked.com (Sun Tsu)
Date: 6 Aug 2004 16:46:07 -0700
Local: Fri, Aug 6 2004 7:46 pm
Subject: Re: SUCCESS!
"Anonymous" <Anonym...@domain.invalid> wrote in message <news:asGQc.942$5E4.870@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com>... You do know that BellSouth offers service in more states than just > "Anonymous" <Anonym...@domain.invalid> wrote in message > news:dsFQc.934$GF4.909@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com... > > If anyone finds any Russian Spam Gang spam in their Inbox, or comes > across > > one of their websites, post here, so we can compile a complete list of > > their domains. We'll try to get as many of them shut down as possible. > > The ones we can't get shut down, we'll drop into the SpamVampire, and > You know what's amazing? I'm hitting spamvertised websites hosted out of > It's adsl-80-85-61.asm.bellsouth.net, IP address 65.80.85.61. Florida, don't you Mr. Anonymous, "I know so much about the Internet, spammers and fighting spam, but I don't know what SPEWS S2134 means." > Hey, spammy, I don't care where you host your websites, if you spam our Have you no shame, Bob, following up your own post in NANAE. Are you > domain, I'm hitting them and getting them borked. If you think you can stop > me, think again... you've become a major cost of doing business, so now I > am YOUR cost of doing business. And I'm not going away until you do. Get > used to it, like we've all had to get used to putting up with your spew. > You stop spamming our domain, I'll stop hitting your spamvertised websites. *sure* that you aren't a spammer involved in a pissing contest with some Florida spammers/competitors. If you were a true spam fighter you wouldn't offer to stop hitting spammy's spamvertised websites once he stopped spamming your domain. What is your domain anyway? It shouldn't be a problem mentioning it You are posting from, NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.207.207.234 Pac Bell Internet Services PBI-NET-7 (NET-63-192-0-0-1) STAN FISHER SBCIS-100531-182148 (NET-63-207-207-232-1) So, Stan, why do you also go by the name of Bob and what do you need 8 CustName: STAN FISHER NetRange: 63.207.207.232 - 63.207.207.239 Hmm, you've had this /29 for four years and you've just started Your posting IP resolves to 151.164.243.21 60 ms 70 ms 84 ms 64.200.89.70 :::: or are you this spammer? :::: Google Search: 151.164.243.21 http://groups.google.com/groups?q=151.164.243.21&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&s... :::: which leads to :::: Registrant: Domain Name: THEANSWERTO.COM Monteforte, Patrick &amp; Tracy gtp...@northcoast.com Registration Service Provider: Record last updated on 20-Mar-2002. :::: NEW REGISTRATION :::: Registration Service Provided By: WTPowers Domain name- theanswerto.com Nameservers- Start of registration- Sat Sep 02 2000 00:41:28 Registrant Contact- Administrative Contact- Billing Contact- Technical Contact- Say, Bob, aren't you that "phool" who claims to be new here? Google Groups: View Thread "[proxy hijacking] theplanet.com / <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=2f0f6d90.0...> > Ok, I'm new here, so I'm not familiar with the language, and these may be Say what? You're new here? Oh, really! > dumb questions, but I'll ask anyway... What is S2134? Is it the tracking >number for a particular SPEWS-blocked spammer? Where do I find these? If you are new here then why do you know so much about whois, LARTing, Let's have a look and see if it's you and examine some of the cr@p you Google Search: author:Anonym...@domain.invalid <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=author:Anonymous...> It would appear that you know a great deal about spammers and fighting :: Re: How Millionaire gets 20,000 visitors a day > Big deal, I've never spent a dime on advertising either, my website's been :: Re: repost Morely if UUNET is Bad then WHY are you WORSE??? > as high as around 2000, and I didn't spam to get there. I'm also ranked #12 > for our second-best search term and #21 for our best search term on Google. > It's called website optimization and creating content people want to read. > Get a life and a clue. > Man, you'd be amazed at how many people are using the email address of Why would someone as "clued" as you use such an address then, hmm, > 'anonym...@domain.invalid'. No wonder I get so much spam... I've got > Sanford Wallace AND Scott Richter right in my Inbox! Bob? Say, Bob, didn't you say that 100% of your spam in the last month was :: Re: webrider.ru - Russian Spam Gang > Yes, but he's not getting those addresses out of the blue, Interesting, Bob, you know all of this but you don't know that S2134 > or from his Contacts list, he's getting them (I would assume, > since this is how I do it) from doing WHOIS and abuse.net > lookups on the URL and IP address of the abusing domain. > If those addresses are listed there, then I'd say LART away. refers to a SPEWS record number. Total cr@p, Bob, just more and more pure 100% prime government inspected bullsh!t from you. :: Re: Reveal who is behind SPEWS > The reason I hate spammers is because my dear departed That's about the same kind of believable cr@p you have been spewing > mother was raped by a spam gang. I guess all those penis > enlargement, viagra and porn ads they were sending finally > got to be too much for them to bear, and they grabbed > the nearest moving object to vent their frustrations on, > which happened to be my mother, God rest her poor > over-humped soul. > She expired giving birth to me, the unholy product of > the evil seed of a thousand spammers, risen from the > very bowels of hell itself to wreak vengeance upon the > spammers of the world in revenge for my dear departed > mother. here in NANAE the last few days. Why, Bob, why are you acting like such a "phool" claiming to be so concerned about a Russian spam gang and that *you* are responsible for "inspiring" InterCosmos.com to cancel spammy's domains. You do realise that most people don't know that InterCosmos.com is DirectNIC.com and that ab...@DirectNIC.com uses a DirectNIC email address, not an InterCosmos.com address, don't you, Bob? How about you post some of the email, along with headers adnd responses, you have been sending (sic) to DirectNic.com concerning this Russian spam gang. :: Re: SUCCESS! > bjbmdbe.info is now dead. Another Russian Spam Gang You're full of cr@p, Bob. Prove it! Post your email exchange with > domain gone... and this one, they didn't even get a chance > to send any spam for. InterCosmos is killing them off > preemptively now. I've got them searching through their records > for the email addresses the Russian Spam Gang has used > to register other domains, and they're killing any off that were > registered with those email addresses. > This is too much fun... 4 spammer domains killed off > (and possibly quite a few more once they find them) in two > days... the Russian Spam Gang has got to be wondering > what's going on. DirectNic.com complete with headers. Otherwise, it's all just spammer speak coming from an idiot/k00k like yourself. :: Re: Spam Surge? > Yes, our rolling monthly spam receival rate went from Make up your mind, Bob, is it 100% or 93% ? > 8 per month for all 15 of our email addresses, to around > 50 / month. Approximately 93% of this is attributable to > the Russian Spam Gang. And, Bob, we? Do you have a frog in your pocket or are you talking :: Re: [mainsleaze] Now Target is spamming > There was a Sam's Club store in the town that remained open You are talking out of your arse again, Bob. You keep fabricating > after Wal-Mart closed... that's the store that sells Wal-Mart's > merchandise returns and cheaper merchandise. I think it was > another Walton family member that started Sam's Club, Sam > Walton's brother, if I remember correctly. "facts" on the fly, sounding much like those pr0n spammers that try to con AOL newbies into downloading trojan spamming viri disguised as FREE webcam viewers. > So, it could be a massive effort to launder Wal-Mart stockholder Bob, *you* are the conspiracy k00k! > money, using it to build the privately owned Sam's Clubs stores > and ensure their success. > Now, that's some fuel for the conspiracy kooks... > let's see where they go with it. :: Re: Godaddy http://www.kevinsmit#.us domains > No, I get the 'honor' of dealing almost exclusively with the Russian You know, Bob, it all makes sense now. You are spouting, "down with > Spam Gang. All the rest of the spammers, I've hammered so hard > they leave our domain alone. These Russian scumbags seem to > have no brains. I got three of their sites shut down just today, and >I'm sure they're going to try spamming our domain again, even after > I wrote them telling them it was me doing them all the damage. the Russian spam gang!" and "look at me, I'm a super fscking spam fighter who got the Russian spam gang's domains shut down at Intercosmos.com!" And at the very same time you question the link between SPEWS S2134 and thePlanet.com; why is that, Bob? Is it because Phil Doroff / SPEWS S2134 and the Russian spam gang are competitors? You follow spam fighting and the Russian spam gangs, don't you, Bob? Hmm, let's see, Phil Doroff of SPEWS S2134 is suspect in some of those Oh, yea, let's not forget that also at the very same time you are Say, Bob, where are those two "isoles" anyway. They were very vocal :: Re: [proxy hijacking] theplanet.com / valueweb.net / atrivo.com >> As for the other references I've found, we have atrivo, various Now see, Bob; see how stupid you look/sound when the good folks of >> apnic and ripe networks, uunet, and abovenet. No theplanet >> connection to S2134 anywhere that I can see. > Ok, I'm new here, so I'm not familiar with the language, and these > may be dumb questions, but I'll ask anyway... What is S2134? > Is it the tracking number for a particular SPEWS-blocked > spammer? Where do I find these? NANAE can plainlysee all of the cr@p you have spewed in NANAE in one post. Here you are responding to your own sock puppet who made three posts Correction, bfs isn't your sock puppet, it's *you* Bob and *this* is So you know everything there is to know about spam fighting, you are a You've been busted, Bob! :( Here you are following up to your very own post which was made by you, <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=bxkQc.628%...> bfs <b...@nowhe.re> wrote in message <news:Xns953BBB8BFD083091116243242@216.168.3.30>... And here's your sock puppet's third post in that very same thread > bananana...@spamblocked.com (Sun Tsu) wrote in > news:2f0f6d90.0408040637.3c7d14a4@posting.google.com: >> No surprise here since thePlanet.com has been hosting Phil Doroff / > You've mentioned theplanet in reference to S2134 at least a > For the benefit for those of us who aren't getting it, where you morphed from "b...@nowhe.re" to "r...@nowhe.re"... :::: <quote> :::: rss <r...@nowhe.re> Bob, who read the previous article but wouldn't initials and wrote: Bob, you forgot to answer the above question. :( > bananana...@spamblocked.com (Sun Tsu) wrote in > news:2f0f6d90.0408050912.1f1a053e@posting.google.com: > > why are you so concerned? Why? > Why can't you just answer a simple question? You go first. You seem afraid to answer these questions as well, Bob. Why is that? > Oh, and Bob, you are no stranger to NANAE, yet you used Let's hear it, Bob. What is your concern with SPEWS S2134? > a one-time email address to make your post in this thread. > Why, Bob? Why the mystery? > Who is Bob and why is he so concerned about > Mr. Doroff and SPEWS S2134 being linked to thePlanet.com? Are you a sock puppet for Doroff? > WTF is your problem? No problem, Bob. You need to answer a few questions before anyone will take you seriously, that's all. > You're a bit of a head case, aren't you? My fault for not noticing the What's your problem with spamblocked.com? You afraid of Morely or > spamblocked.com address, I suppose. just a spanked spammer who is intimidated by someone like him who doesn't take any sh!t from k00ks like you? Do you have some sort of problem with this posting address as well? Say, Bob, why do you keep morphing posting email addresses, and why Bob, is that your name or what you do? You're a bad dog! Cheers, SuN -- Do you speak Sicilian, Bob? :::: </quote> :::: OK, Bob, you changed your initials from post to post from 'bfs' to The 'b' to 'r' is easy, you changed the 'b' for Bob to 'r' for Robert. :: Re: New Bout of x-no-archive stalker (wilhelp) SPAM <-- Tietjens > God, OK, enough... we get it already. Your message has been read, Interesting, Bob, what one k00k says about a troll, especially what > those who choose to believe you do so, and those who don't, don't. > Let it rest, please... one k00k who used x-no-archieve commenting on someone else who uses x-no-archieve. This is particularly in light of the fact of what you have said about spamblocked.com under your Nom-de-NANAE, bfs. Hmm, another comment concerning spamblocked.com, eh Bob. Who and what you post about says a great deal about your motives for being here in NANAE. > There has to be something in your life that has a higher precedent than Spoken like *true* chickenboner, Bob. There's that "we" again. Just > chasing after a couple of people who are supposedly spammers, or at the > very least, a more effective means of doing so... I mean, if I were chasing > down a spammer, I'd contact the spammer-hunters group I belong to, we'd dig > up every detail on his life, we'd figure out his schedule and his business > and personal associations, where he lives, where he works, what his habits > are, we'd hack into his computers and gather information (if for no other > reason than to publicly embarrass him if he tries to fight us), we'd sniff > his wireless network if he's got one and capture any data he's sending or > receiving, we'd do all sorts of stuff, but we definitely wouldn't spend all > (or even any) of our time trying to publicly humiliate him in an online > newsgroup, where a person's credibility is nearly nil starting out, and > usually only rises if we're well known enough to make a large impact on > that particular sub-sector of the online genre, and often falls to below > nil if we say or do something that makes people believe we're a kook or > troll. It's not an effective use of our time, and it accomplishes > absolutely nothing toward our ultimate goal... the end to spam. how many frogs do you have in your "widdle itty bitty" pants pockets. You talk cr@p, Bob. You *are* cr@p, Bob! You pr0n spammers all have that "thingie" about being such great orators and just love to see your words in print "above the line" as Stewart like to say. And you "get off" by pretending to be some "hot babe" in a chat room on AOL whilst talking to a *male* about sex. Talk about the "bottom" of the barrel. Bubba's gonna like yo' spammy arse when his "thingie" gets to your bottom. You're a botton, right Bob, you should "feel" right at home as Bubba's b!tch. > I think you have to stop, sit back from the keyboard for a minute, Sounds reasonable, Bob, if one can be honest with oneself and others. > and quietly, calmly ask yourself, "What is my ultimate goal? > What do I want to get out of this endeavor, and is this the > most effective means of going about it?" What is *your* ultimate goal and why are *you* here now in NANAE? Is it to persuade others to help eliminate your competition, a particular Russian spam gang? > Hope this helps... Take your own advice, Bob. After all, it's worth what you paid for it. Maybe that's why it didn't help you. :: Re: 66.209.64.0/19 removal > Something you might also have a conceptual error about is that You "Shirley" know a great deal about what spammers are doing these > the DNS servers don't ISSUE the IP addresses to the web servers... > they're merely translating between a FQDN and an IP address... even if > the DNS server is down, if that website can be accessed via its IP address, > you'll be able to access it. That's why a lot of spammers are moving to using > IP addresses instead of URLs, they cut out the possibility of the Registrar > or DNS provider cutting them off from the DNS servers, thus effectively > cutting them off from the web. Notice I didn't say 'cutting them off from > the internet'. The internet and the web are two different things. You > can be cut off from the web, and still able to access the 'net, but if > you're cut off from the 'net, there's no way you're getting on the web. days, "don'tcha," Bob. All of that knowledge about the web and the Internet and you still couldn't figure out how SPEWS creates their record designations. You are pathetic, Bob and *very* Rules 1-3 challenged. :: Re: SPEWS Periodic Weedout, Ezzi.net :::: <quote> :::: > You are an entertaining writer. How about you entertain us (TINU) Unless he IS the FBI... oooh, now we'll have the conspiracy nuts > with a good story, good enough to convince the FBI, why a tracert to > your posting IP resolves to > ::: 17 47 ms 57 ms 67 ms 65.125.237.66 proxy04-node142.fbi.gov. coming out of the woodwork! Here, let's wind them up a bit, and see where they spin: NANAE IS BEING WATCHED BY THE FBI !!! That ought to do it... stand back, everyone, while the kooks and :::: </quote> :::: There's that isolate.net stench of humour again, Bob. You *are* one :: Re: SPEWS - Please remove our IP from your List :::: <quote> :::: > Years ago, when all here were saying uu.net was unresponsive, I very Hi, Brad. > easily and simply (took two short, simple requests) got them to remove > the account for Rizler. If you do the right thing and present the right > evidence you can get spammer accounts removed. As a side efect you also > educate the ISPs into reaizing that their comlicity is glaringly > visible, with all the potential bad publicity that entails. How did you do it with uu.net? I'm always on the lookout for Thanks for any help you can provide... :::: </quote> :::: Where are your LARTS posted, Bob? You talk the talk, but you don't Be honest, Bob, you've read Sun-Tzu, haven't you, and you are :: Re: AOL User spamming AOL Users via Windows Messaging Serivce >> Domain: spw4a.com There's that "isole" stench of humour, again, Bob. You're making fun >> Registrant >> Gary Preston >> Gary Preston >> Gary...@AOL.com >> Secure Computer, LLCPO Box 583 >> Mamaroneck, New York 10543 US >> +1.9145171382 >Looks like it's time to send a LART to Eliot Spitzer, the NY State Attorney > General. He's anti-spam, his office should do something about it. > Try this address: > http://www.oag.state.ny.us/internet/onlineformspage.html of Spitzer since he settled with Snotty, "orangeya?" Hmm, maybe you know Snotty personally, do you, Bob? :: Re: Ricon Associates Mortgage spamming thru open proxy "Bananas in the Falklands" <banana....@fk.nospam> wrote in message >> My proxy pot had this deposited in it by Ricon Associates LLC So that's it. You are doing all of this to gather intel for "them." (whoever >> they be) for destinations elsewhere and it was one of several dropped to >> my proxy via host-81-190-197-201.gizycko.mm.pl (81.190.197.201) > What proxy pot do you use? I'm running JackPot, but the proxypot on it > doesn't seem to fool proxy spammers, so I'm only getting relay spammers. You're one of "them" and not one of us (tinu). Shame on you, Bob. You *are* here on a Book 13 (Sun-Tzu, The Art of War) mission. :: Re: spam@uce > Well, considering that they're struggling with just what Well, aren't you the helpful little chickenboner, Bob. The best place > they've got now, I'd say with more than double the amount, > it'd put them out of business for a while. I'd let them get the > u...@ftc.gov and s...@uce.gov issue worked out first. Then, > I'd call the FTC at (202) 326-2000, and ask to be forwarded to > the whoever is in charge of the email servers for u...@ftc.gov and > s...@uce.gov, and get permission to forward your received > spam to them. to hide is in plain sight, "idnit." Perhaps you aren't that stupid after all. Wait, you made that stupid chickenboner comment about spamblocked.com so you really *are* that stupid. > And, if you can, create an overall aggregate of which ISPs' IP Send the FTC a list of which ISP's are sending the spam? Well, that > addresses are sending you the spam, and submit a report at > http://www.econsumer.gov/english/index.html. Hopefully, the > spammers are located in one of the member countries, and > something will get done about it. won't impact the spammers who use stolen resources such as trojanned boxen, now will it? You funny, Bob, very funny. :: SpamVampire... > I learned about aa419.org's Lad Vampire a while back, and Isn't that you, aren't *you* Mr. Anonymous? You're a spammer and > used it for a while to be sure it was effective. After learning > that it was, indeed, effective, I decided that since the source > code that aa419.org was using had been contributed by an > anonymous person, that Mr. Anonymous probably wouldn't > mind me using the code for my own purposes. spammers steal whatever they want from the Internet, code, images, resources, don't they, Bob? > I reworked the code so it runs just as well from the local Amazing, absolutely fscking amazing that someone could know so much > computer as it does from a website, fixed the errors so it > would validate as HTML 4.01 Strict, and added a throttle > so it didn't take all the available bandwidth. > It is my belief (validated by experience) that data draining of > spamvertised websites to such an extent that spamming your > domain is a negative-income proposition results in the spammers > leaving you alone. Our spam receival rate has dropped from > around 3000/month at the beginning of this year to less than > 50 per month now. I had been using FriedSpam.net in > the past, and still do for some websites, but this is a faster > and more effective means of hitting the spamvertised websites. about coding and the Internet and not know how SPEWS designates its records. Wait, Bob, now you are talking about multiple domains and websites. Previously you spoke in the singular. That's typical of a spammer, vacillating between singular and plural. The experience you talk about was most likely gained from the other > Feel free to grab the source code and use it for your own purposes: What's in it for you? > http://www.hillscapital.com/antispam/index.htm :: Re: newbe question :::: <quote> :::: "IntentionallyLeftBl...@no.no" <intentionallyleftbl...@no.no> wrote in > Somebody suggested to me that the best way to fight spam is to response to Yes, it's effective, but only if you find a way to strip the URL down > each and every spam mail by going to their site and filling out the > form/questionnaire with bogus info, incluing bogus name, e-mail, crdit card > info, etc. so any identifying information that can be traced back to you is no longer there. For instance, say a spam is advertising the following URL: Then you'd have to strip out that last part or change it so it can't It is best if you visit the spamvertised website via anonymous proxies Of course, it's time consuming, and it becomes more effective if more The spammers will never know that it's all coming from the same In the whole scheme of things, it's a small annoyance to the spammers. :::: </quote> :::: This is a particularly revealing post by you, Bob. Once again, you Google Search: author:intentionallyleftbl...@no.no <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&q=author:intention...> Results 1 - 1 of about 2 for author:intentionallyleftbl...@no.no That would be two posts in the same thread for this one-time poster Let's have a look at them, shall we. :::: <quote> :::: From: intentionallyleftblank (intentionallyleftbl...@no.no) View this article only Hi All, I'm pretty much of a newbe here, so I hope this question makes some Someone I know, suggests to respond to each and every spam you receive Any response much appreciated. [and] From: IntentionallyLeftBl...@no.no (intentionallyleftbl...@no.no) View this article only Hi All, I am a newby, so I hope this question makes sense. Somebody suggested to me that the best way to fight spam is to On the other hand, a general principle is that you should not lie. Best regards, <void> :::: </quote> :::: Interesting, in one post the OP spelt newbie as "newbe" and in another Also interesting is the great detail with which you gave to a "newbie" Lettuce (tinl) think about the validity of what you have posted. You Hmm, Phil Doroff / SPEWS S2134 / bitpushers / five-elements / Google Search: SPEWS S2134 mortgage Results 1 - 10 of about 67 for SPEWS S2134 mortgage <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&scoring=d&q=S...> As you can see, Phil changes spamvertised domains on a regular basis, Google Search: SPEWS S2134 mortgage LMIHosting Results 1 - 8 of about 17 for SPEWS S2134 mortgage LMIHosting <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&scoring=d&q=S...> LMIHosting is generally regarded as a morph of the isolate.net spam http://www.spews.org/html/S2170.html Spammers & spammer hosts. <http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=20031012221913.29999.00000249%40...> :::: <quote> :::: Spamhaus tells us (TINU) that there are under 200 hard core spammers What ever happened to those bad boy spammers known as isolate.net? Maybe this, which just found its way into spam traps set up last year [snip] These name servers implicate other spammers and/or SPEWS records, but Here's another John Doe registration. domain: IMPROVEITNOW.COM.BR [snip] Are these spammers known as lmihosting.com really the isolate.net :::: </quote> :::: Now, Bob, consider that an AOL niche spammer, which Phil Doroff is as AOL niche spammers harvest fresh email addresses nightly/daily in AOL Now let's examine why you would be recommending that people fill out Aren't you ashamed of yourself for trying to "phool" everyone in NANAE :: Re: spammer honeypots :::: <quote> :::: ...but regrettably I'm not in a position to support it properly at the moment (and I haven't been for about a year now). If some Java developer is interested in taking it on, I will gladly provide the source. Oh, hi, Jack! I didn't realize that was you. Yeah, JackPot is running If anyone is interested in running JackPot, I give a hearty I use several antispam techniques... JackPot is a big part of it, but http://www.hillscapital.com/antispam/index.htm Feel free to grab the source code and use it against your own -SpamSlayer :::: <quote> :::: This is your second post in NANAE as Mr. Anonymous and you still All of that talk about running Jackpot and where are the results of :: Strike back against the spammers... :::: <quote> :::: Hi, all. I've taken the Lad Vampire (aa419.org) code (used to hit 419 sites), For businesses: For individuals: This all hinges upon the spammee contacting the spammer, and telling It really works better than anything else I've tried, and I've tried Anyway, feel free to grab the source code and enter in the URLs of the http://www.hillscapital.com/antispam/index.htm :::: </quote> :::: Hmm, there's that, "Hi, all" again that your other socks used to set This was your first post as Mr. Anonymous and *no one* responded to To view Bob's BIG picture even more clearly, read "all" of Bob's posts Bob, you are either a mortgage spammer yourself or you support, or Cheers, SuN -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||