Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:31:43 -0500, Andrew Barrett
<and
...@spamfree.org> wrote:
>In article <3ac20efd.9439
...@typhoon.sonic.net>, an entity calling
>itself Mark Ferguson propagated electrons into the ether, which
>spelled out:
>> It has your comments in it but I don't see anywhere in the article
>> where anybody questions the numbers. They claim to have contacted
>> 25,000 confirmed OPT-IN people provided by NetCreations.
>I'm not sure I'm clear on the question. Do you mean to ask whether
>they really did get ahold of 25,000? or if all 25,000 opted-in to be
>contacted by NetCreations for the survey?
I bleieve Netcreations provided the OPT-IN list. My question is/was
did the author of the survey send email to all 25,000? If so then
their numbers are way, way, way off.
>In either case, though, I think the answer is, I guess we have to take
>NetCreations' word for it, because I can think of no way to
>independantly verify the claim.
><flameshield>
>I am inclined to give NetCreations the benefit of the doubt on that
>point, because their president, Rosalind Resnick, has been a constant
>thorn in the side of the DMA, to which her company belongs. She has
>been a very vocal stalwart for strict opt-in list management -- as you
>and I define opt-in, not as the DMA defines it -- for many years. She
>condemned the so-called best practices offered by AIM's responsible
>electronic marketing group.
I have no doubt of this. I have rarely if ever heard complaint
about them.
>I also met her at Spam Summit last May, and she was the only one among
>marketers to come out and say that she was against using incentives
>for viral e-mail marketing. She is a white hat in a sea of grey to
>dark black hats. Very clueful marketer.
></flameshield>
>I have copies of the summary of the survey results in monster-huge
>powerpoint files. I could boost them to a server for downloading, if
>that would help.
My thought was/is if this survey contacted all 25,000 OPT-IN
individuals and asked them if they preferred OPT-OUT.
To ask OPT-IN this question seems a little strange to me but so be
it.
They then offered monetary incentives to these people to participate
and apparently 23,240 did not reply. I would conclude these people
did not approve of OPT-OUT but these individuals are not even
reflected in the survey.
It is kind of skewed if you think about it. I just am not sure the
person that did the survey actually sent emails to the entire 25,000
people on the list or just sent to a set number.
>Uh, lemme check first and make sure I can still find them.
>--
>Andrew Barrett, FREE Media Coordinator
><http://www.spamfree.org>
>"We have a blind date with Destiny, and
>it looks like she ordered the lobster."
>~ The Shoveler ~