Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Paging Andrew Barrett
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mark Ferguson  
View profile  
 More options Mar 28 2001, 11:35 am
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
From: ad...@whew.com (Mark Ferguson)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:28:33 GMT
Local: Wed, Mar 28 2001 11:28 am
Subject: Paging Andrew Barrett
Greetings Andrew,

  Do you remember this article?

It has your comments in it but I don't see anywhere in the article
where anybody questions the numbers.  They claim to have contacted
25,000 confirmed OPT-IN people provided by NetCreations.

  Two problems.

The first would be the numbers of people they contacted and the number
that responded.

The second would be they tapped a confirmed OPT-IN list to ask about
OPT-OUT spam.

  Did I miss something regarding the number of people in the list they
bought and the number that responded to the survey?????

Comments.

--
Regards Mark


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Andrew Barrett  
View profile  
 More options Mar 28 2001, 3:32 pm
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
From: Andrew Barrett <and...@spamfree.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:31:43 -0500
Local: Wed, Mar 28 2001 3:31 pm
Subject: Re: Paging Andrew Barrett
In article <3ac20efd.9439...@typhoon.sonic.net>, an entity calling
itself Mark Ferguson propagated electrons into the ether, which
spelled out:

> It has your comments in it but I don't see anywhere in the article
> where anybody questions the numbers.  They claim to have contacted
> 25,000 confirmed OPT-IN people provided by NetCreations.

I'm not sure I'm clear on the question. Do you mean to ask whether
they really did get ahold of 25,000? or if all 25,000 opted-in to be
contacted by NetCreations for the survey?

In either case, though, I think the answer is, I guess we have to take
NetCreations' word for it, because I can think of no way to
independantly verify the claim.

<flameshield>
I am inclined to give NetCreations the benefit of the doubt on that
point, because their president, Rosalind Resnick, has been a constant
thorn in the side of the DMA, to which her company belongs. She has
been a very vocal stalwart for strict opt-in list management -- as you
and I define opt-in, not as the DMA defines it -- for many years. She
condemned the so-called best practices offered by AIM's responsible
electronic marketing group.

I also met her at Spam Summit last May, and she was the only one among
marketers to come out and say that she was against using incentives
for viral e-mail marketing. She is a white hat in a sea of grey to
dark black hats. Very clueful marketer.
</flameshield>

I have copies of the summary of the survey results in monster-huge
powerpoint files. I could boost them to a server for downloading, if
that would help.

Uh, lemme check first and make sure I can still find them.

--

Andrew Barrett, FREE Media Coordinator
<http://www.spamfree.org>

"We have a blind date with Destiny, and
it looks like she ordered the lobster."

~ The Shoveler ~


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mark Ferguson  
View profile  
 More options Mar 29 2001, 12:24 am
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
From: ad...@whew.com (Mark Ferguson)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 05:19:20 GMT
Local: Thurs, Mar 29 2001 12:19 am
Subject: Re: Paging Andrew Barrett
Hi Andrew,

On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:31:43 -0500, Andrew Barrett

<and...@spamfree.org> wrote:
>In article <3ac20efd.9439...@typhoon.sonic.net>, an entity calling
>itself Mark Ferguson propagated electrons into the ether, which
>spelled out:

>> It has your comments in it but I don't see anywhere in the article
>> where anybody questions the numbers.  They claim to have contacted
>> 25,000 confirmed OPT-IN people provided by NetCreations.

>I'm not sure I'm clear on the question. Do you mean to ask whether
>they really did get ahold of 25,000? or if all 25,000 opted-in to be
>contacted by NetCreations for the survey?

  I bleieve Netcreations provided the OPT-IN list.  My question is/was
did the author of the survey send email to all 25,000?  If so then
their numbers are way, way, way off.

>In either case, though, I think the answer is, I guess we have to take
>NetCreations' word for it, because I can think of no way to
>independantly verify the claim.

><flameshield>
>I am inclined to give NetCreations the benefit of the doubt on that
>point, because their president, Rosalind Resnick, has been a constant
>thorn in the side of the DMA, to which her company belongs. She has
>been a very vocal stalwart for strict opt-in list management -- as you
>and I define opt-in, not as the DMA defines it -- for many years. She
>condemned the so-called best practices offered by AIM's responsible
>electronic marketing group.

  I have no doubt of this.  I have rarely if ever heard complaint
about them.

>I also met her at Spam Summit last May, and she was the only one among
>marketers to come out and say that she was against using incentives
>for viral e-mail marketing. She is a white hat in a sea of grey to
>dark black hats. Very clueful marketer.
></flameshield>

>I have copies of the summary of the survey results in monster-huge
>powerpoint files. I could boost them to a server for downloading, if
>that would help.

  My thought was/is if this survey contacted all 25,000 OPT-IN
individuals and asked them if they preferred OPT-OUT.

  To ask OPT-IN this question seems a little strange to me but so be
it.

  They then offered monetary incentives to these people to participate
and apparently 23,240 did not reply.  I would conclude these people
did not approve of OPT-OUT but these individuals are not even
reflected in the survey.

  It is kind of skewed if you think about it.  I just am not sure the
person that did the survey actually sent emails to the entire 25,000
people on the list or just sent to a set number.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »