Tom Betz <tb
...@panix.com> wrote:
> Quoth ste
...@actrix.co.nz in <3ADFACA5.C163
...@actrix.co.nz>:
> |Re Orbs blocking Actrix
> |
> |The simple fact is that ACTRIX is not an open relay. ACTRIX has been
> |included on the ORBS database because actrix.gen.nz is the delivery
> |point for domainz.net.nz, and there is a dispute between Alan Brown (the
> |ORBS administrator) and Domainz (Actrix isn't involved in that
> |dispute). However, only those who check the database will discover why
> |Actrix is included.
> You might start by getting your facts straight.
> If you are referring to 203.96.26.131 (mail.actrix.gen.nz), it is not
> in the open relay database, it is in the static database.
Specifically, it's in the spamsources and manual databases
131.26.96.203.manual.orbs.org internet address = 127.0.0.5
131.26.96.203.spamsources.orbs.org internet address = 127.0.0.6
BUT it's also in inputs.orbs.org, even though the ORBS website
reports otherwise -- and that's a pretty big BUT:
inputs.orbs.org
origin = dns-orbs.proxy.aol.com
mail addr = hostmaster.orbs.org
serial = 987739202
refresh = 1800 (30M)
retry = 900 (15M)
expire = 2592000 (4w2d)
minimum ttl = 300 (5M)
131.26.96.203.inputs.orbs.org internet address = 127.0.0.2
The inclusion of 203.96.26.131 in a list of open relays
appears to be erroneous, since inputs.orbs.org is for
"multistage inputs and direct open relays, automated
tester only, returns 127.0.0.2" -- if, that is, we accept the
ORBS database check reporting that "203.96.26.131 is not in
the main automated open relay database". I mean, either it
is or isn't. If it isn't, why is it in the DNS zone?
This may very well be the first recorded instance of ORBS
not functioning as described on their web site.
Users of inputs.orbs.org may want to whitelist 203.96.26.131
until the discrepancy is resolved. Those not using
inputs.orbs.org may want to *begin* blocking 203.96.26.131
for a personalized cartooney threat.
--
Bill "who am I and what have I done with myself?" Maloy (brm4)