Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
news . admin . net-abuse . blocklisting
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Find or start a Google Group about blocklisting.
Group info
Language: English
Group categories:
News
More group info »
Discussions
View:  Topic list, Topic summary Topics 1 - 10 of 3178  Older »

You cannot post messages because this group is only available as an archive.
Description: Discussion of ip-based blocklisting. (Moderated)
 

2nd RFD: news.admin.net-abuse.blocklist ing moderated (remove) LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS 
  REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) - LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS moderated news.admin.net-abuse.blocklist ing This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the moderated newsgroup news.admin.net-abuse.blocklist ing. RATIONALE: Interest in the group has declined to the point where it is felt... more »
By Big 8 Management Board  - Mar 27 2011 - 2 new of 2 messages    

RFD: news.admin.net-abuse.blocklist ing moderated (remove) 
  REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) moderated news.admin.net-abuse.blocklist ing This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the moderated newsgroup news.admin.net-abuse.blocklist ing. Newsgroups Line: news.admin.net-abuse.blocklist ing Discussion of... more »
By Jim Seymour  - Feb 26 2011 - 1 new of 1 message    

Shutdown of news.admin.net-abuse.blocklist ing 
  Good Day, Apparently interest in news.admin.net-abuse.blocklist ing has waned. Its moderators report that for some time nearly all they've been seeing has been delisting requests for blocklists that don't care to run delisting queues of their own. Thus, back in May, 2010, the moderation team (from which I had resigned/retired back in... more »
By Jim Seymour  - Feb 24 2011 - 1 new of 1 message    

Our LIR Public IP /21 range is banned from code.google.com 
  Hi, I am the one of the Technical Network Engineers at RapidSpeeds.com, and I am investigating our Whole 46.182.120.0/21 IP Range being banned from code.google.com. Can anyone shed some light on this, as I have had no contact regarding this issue, and it's a brand new assignment from RIPE that is only... more »
By RapidSpeeds  - Feb 22 2011 - 1 new of 1 message    

APEWS: E-180006 
  Hi, Hi, With regards to this listing below: ============================== ========== Entry matching your Query: E-180006 109.0.0.0/8 CASE: C-131 Unallocated CIDR, no traffic until allocated, or allocated but dynamic / generically named IPs, or bogons, see [link], or orphaned IP / CIDR in routing table... more »
By Rapidswitch Administrator  - Apr 26 2010 - 5 new of 5 messages    

Spamhaus Ref: SBL87209 
  This Advisory: [link] contains the following sweeping generalisation: "It is our considered opinion that nothing of any merit emanates from this block. Large parts of Romania appear to be in Nevada and much of it is snowshoe spam." I can assure them that to my certain knowledge this is incorrect. One... more »
By Martin Nicholas  - Mar 11 2010 - 2 new of 2 messages    

APEWS: E-356058 
  Hi, My host is listed on APEWS.org: Entry matching your Query: E-356058 CASE: C-1010 Dynamic IP space, generic DNS/rDNS, no PTR Direct connections to MX not permitted, you need to use your ISP servers or smarthostSpecial Reason: Dynamic IP, generic DNS, missing rDNS/PTR not permitted for direct email connection. You must use correctly configured [with registered... more »
By fre...@trash-mail.com  - Feb 23 2010 - 4 new of 4 messages    

Wrong behavior from DNSBL apews.org? 
  Hi, I don't know why, but at apews.org there seem to be some very aggresive rules to be active. This is definetly doing more harm then good... The problem is, that the mailsystems from our customer (83.236.152.228 and 83.236.152.229) are listed in their database, as we are part of the class b net 83.236.0.0/16. But as one can see on the ripe... more »
By sancho  - Jan 23 2010 - 3 new of 3 messages    

UCEprotect et al - NANA.Blocking moderation 
  The moderation team believes that everything anyone could ever say about the pros and cons of backscatterer's methodology has been said at least three times already. These discussions are no longer useful or productive. Discussion of uceprotect's policies has been covered many many times and now also falls under our charter as "repetitive... more »
By NANA.Blocklisting moderation team  - Jan 11 2010 - 1 new of 1 message    

Listing of Level 2 and Level 3 Escalations 
  Dear Admin Team I need clarity on how I can get the record of Level 2 and Level 3 escalated IP address. My AS was listed with some 650 IP Hosts and now it is with 250 Hosts. But the Level 2 and Level 3 escalation numbers is not decreasing. Can you please explain. Syed Ahmad Rasool AS45669.
By Ahmad  - Jan 11 2010 - 1 new of 1 message    

1 - 10 of 3178   « Newer | Older »

XML