Received: by 10.50.47.201 with SMTP id f9mr3894495ign.5.1332117246766;
        Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: networkx-discuss@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.114.3 with SMTP id jc3ls3597759igb.0.gmail; Sun, 18 Mar
 2012 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.158.4 with SMTP id f4mr5512123icx.4.1332117244320;
        Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.158.4 with SMTP id f4mr5512122icx.4.1332117244311;
        Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <arichagb...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id em8si1746467igc.2.2012.03.18.17.34.04
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of arichagb...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.182;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of arichagb...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=arichagb...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-iy0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k25so12073726iah.13
        for <networkx-discuss@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=4Ph6dn3nvy9JAtK2VSej1TtrlQd8tI/u+N80if5gmsk=;
        b=uR4R0OEiGpl7+lq1Ui9Q5FjLtDoSOWRdko4q/NNzbYhzw3vPKT+nj9Rtsbp9GsdnVO
         07yXGO8Mi12p7Gv+suqYTJN5dOzjutYW2weet7FbzEPIq+W6wSfkknwYyx+A+O2CxQma
         mep+5+SKBztCaLKvqtAeXtUTiI7T3CglWL10NH3pcT8/U6IU15x0s/CcdhDzVKvIuLBe
         epoeTxo3S3eVTeoGv+rpZ54lTgOFsHFRbV9ejQEcCtTRaDaE6vEbqUcIQ1jiaAZr01LN
         CWL8iqkHxMcFDxuyzrSDq6x8tdENbt0+DBbMs5FoP3lFcLwsGeAqe6jg8mGiNdrlBtts
         2Szg==
Received: by 10.50.156.166 with SMTP id wf6mr4477781igb.31.1332117244168; Sun,
 18 Mar 2012 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: arichagb...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.42.220.198 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <25312379.1702.1331939526675.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbze11>
References: <25312379.1702.1331939526675.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbze11>
From: Aric Hagberg <aric.hagb...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:33:43 -0600
Message-ID: <CAASiNJUCutX9QKXcuXHwDtS4JX_=PUzC42ePfU+qnRtLo+r...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [networkx-discuss] Persistent storage for NetworkX graphs
To: networkx-discuss@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Vincent Gauthier <p...@luxbulb.org> wrote:
> Hi !
>
> After a quick search through the group topics I don't see anymore update on
> a persistent storage solution for networkx, any idea on how this issue are
> going to be handle, is it still active ?

There was a short discussion last year
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/networkx-discuss/lOhordMuUmE ,
but nobody has mentioned any update since then.  I'd like to have a
graph database storage option.  I'm not up-to-date on the latest
developments so if someone can suggest which one might be appropriate
I'd look into it.  It should have a compatible license with NetworkX's
BSD license.

Aric