Message from discussion
193.188.34.128/26
Received: by 10.35.111.17 with SMTP id o17mr1948719pym.1179651640160;
Sun, 20 May 2007 02:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com with HTTP;
Sun, 20 May 2007 09:00:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-IP: 195.158.90.199
From: Gigi <dand...@gmail.com>
To: network-programming-2007 <network-programming-2007@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: 193.188.34.128/26
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 09:00:39 -0000
Message-ID: <1179651639.067230.4590@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1179643820.813977.239300@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
References: <1179595534.790263.253070@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
<1179643820.813977.239300@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I didn't say there's anything wrong... I just wanted to know whether
my reasoning was correct. However it is odd that you have 2 bits for
subnetting which are useless.
Mela unless you state otherwise, I'm going to assume we have 32 IP
addresses available, and that my reasoning is correct.
Thanks.
|
