We'll be testing our update infrastructure and mechanisms on Tuesday, March 22. If all goes well with that testing, we'll release early Wednesday morning.
For your localization to be a part of the release on Wednesday morning, we need to have your project lead certify the build and note that in bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286605 by tomorrow morning at 9 am PST. We may have time to test a couple of additional localization upgrade scenarios for builds that get certified before noon PST, but our schedule doesn't have a lot of room in it so it would be very, very helpful if you all could get those builds certified quickly.
We'll be checking to make sure that the localization conforms to our the guidelines (it should since nothing significant will have changed since the 1.0.1 releases) and then we'll be testing that the XPI packages and RDF files are all correct and working. We have to do this for both ugrades from 1.0 and 1.0.1 so MoFo QA is going to be very busy. Please help us get these releases all out on the same day by certifying sometime in the next 17 hours.
Asa Dotzler wrote: > For your localization to be a part of the release on Wednesday morning, > we need to have your project lead certify the build and note that in bug > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286605 by tomorrow morning > at 9 am PST. We may have time to test a couple of additional > localization upgrade scenarios for builds that get certified before noon > PST, but our schedule doesn't have a lot of room in it so it would be > very, very helpful if you all could get those builds certified quickly.
> We'll be checking to make sure that the localization conforms to our the > guidelines (it should since nothing significant will have changed since > the 1.0.1 releases) and then we'll be testing that the XPI packages and > RDF files are all correct and working. We have to do this for both > ugrades from 1.0 and 1.0.1 so MoFo QA is going to be very busy. Please > help us get these releases all out on the same day by certifying > sometime in the next 17 hours.
>> We'll be testing our update infrastructure and mechanisms on Tuesday, >> March 22. If all goes well with that testing, we'll release early >> Wednesday morning.
>> For your localization to be a part of the release on Wednesday >> morning, we need to have your project lead certify the build and note >> that in bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286605 by >> tomorrow morning at 9 am PST. We may have time to test a couple of >> additional localization upgrade scenarios for builds that get >> certified before noon PST, but our schedule doesn't have a lot of room >> in it so it would be very, very helpful if you all could get those >> builds certified quickly.
>> We'll be checking to make sure that the localization conforms to our >> the guidelines (it should since nothing significant will have changed >> since the 1.0.1 releases) and then we'll be testing that the XPI >> packages and RDF files are all correct and working. We have to do this >> for both ugrades from 1.0 and 1.0.1 so MoFo QA is going to be very >> busy. Please help us get these releases all out on the same day by >> certifying sometime in the next 17 hours.
Italian it-IT win32, Linux and Mac OsX builds are tested and ready for staging; I'm writing also in the l10n list because the locale owner (Michele Dal Corso) has still some problems with Internet connection, so I'm going to comment the bug even if I'm not the locale owner (I did the same for 1.0.1 version)..
Asa Dotzler <a...@mozilla.org> wrote in message <news:d1nmvu$k0u2@ripley.netscape.com>... > We'll be testing our update infrastructure and mechanisms on Tuesday, March 22. If all > goes well with that testing, we'll release early Wednesday morning.
> For your localization to be a part of the release on Wednesday morning, we need to have > your project lead certify the build and note that in bug > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=286605 by tomorrow morning at 9 am PST. We > may have time to test a couple of additional localization upgrade scenarios for builds > that get certified before noon PST, but our schedule doesn't have a lot of room in it so > it would be very, very helpful if you all could get those builds certified quickly.
> We'll be checking to make sure that the localization conforms to our the guidelines (it > should since nothing significant will have changed since the 1.0.1 releases) and then > we'll be testing that the XPI packages and RDF files are all correct and working. We have > to do this for both ugrades from 1.0 and 1.0.1 so MoFo QA is going to be very busy. Please > help us get these releases all out on the same day by certifying sometime in the next 17 > hours.
> Thanks.
> - A
Is anyone actively testing/responsible for the dutch version?
FWIW, if no one is, then i'm willing to sign it off if needs be. Tested and approve of the Win XP version. Will check Mac OS X and Linux tonight.
Axel Hecht wrote: > Thanks for that. > Maybe related, I'm still puzzled about testrunner. Could we get a intro > or rationale if and why (not) testrunner could/should add/help with l10n > QA? That looks about as confused as I am.
Here's a page on Testrunner (not sure if you've already seen it):
As you'll see, we've got a long to-do list, like upgrading and integration with b.m.o. :) However, I agree that Testrunner would be a good place to have l10n tests.
Thanks for that. Maybe related, I'm still puzzled about testrunner. Could we get a intro or rationale if and why (not) testrunner could/should add/help with l10n QA? That looks about as confused as I am.
>> Thanks for that. >> Maybe related, I'm still puzzled about testrunner. Could we get a >> intro or rationale if and why (not) testrunner could/should add/help >> with l10n QA? That looks about as confused as I am.
> Here's a page on Testrunner (not sure if you've already seen it):
> As you'll see, we've got a long to-do list, like upgrading and > integration with b.m.o. :) However, I agree that Testrunner would be a > good place to have l10n tests.
Ah, my question is to-do-item number 4 :-).
I wonder if we could eventually integrate testrunner into our l10n sign-off process. Does testrunner have a feature like a review request? I'm thinking of l10n teams requesting a mac test, in particular.
I should probably mumble in the wiki, but I'm not sure if that'd be a testrunner or a mister item or both. So I'm dumping it here ;-)
