Daniel Glazman: Correction Requested
MozillaCensorsMe
(http://daniel.glazman.free.fr/weblog/newarchive/2003_08_10_glazblogarc.html#s106080561704254037):
PSA (Proud Stupid asshole) strikes again
Remember Andras Konya, the guy who assimilated Mozilla imagery to the
Nazis? He strikes back in netscape.public.mozilla.general. Here's a
verbatim, don't laugh too loud, your neighbour is sleeping :-)
" Yes Munich seems to be a different place than Berlin. They arent
even spelled the same. "
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Pathetic.
Please add a link to the actual discussion and make mention of the
irony and humor (that you obviously forgot about the first time you
read it). Having problems with interpreting irony online is a bit
difficult, but at least you could have read the prior posts.
MAD
once in a while...
MozillaCensorsMe
> Aw, come on! If you really cared about your reputation, you'd shut up
> once in a while...
>
First off, if you'd know what the hell you are talking about, then
you'd know it's not polite to top post. These idiotic insults aren't
worth my time or yours. If you'd actually care about what you said,
you'd point out these situations where I should have shut up. But
being a hypocrite like most other people, you'll generalize and come
up with bland one-liners. And when you get slammed into the ground,
you'll ooze away not wanting to continue your misery, despite the fact
that you are a lot more anonymous than most (esp me).
Secondly, this is more of a "saving face" adventure. I'm a nice guy by
most personal accounts and would hate to make fun a Daniel Glazman in
future essays (etc) for being ironically dead. But I guess *some*
people have more arrogance and pride in themselves than simply to
admit even a trivial mistake.
Daniel Glazman
> Please add a link to the actual discussion and make mention of the
> irony and humor (that you obviously forgot about the first time you
> read it). Having problems with interpreting irony online is a bit
> difficult, but at least you could have read the prior posts.
Bwahahaha. Irony and humour. Correction requested. Bwahaha!!!
This _is_ humour, indeed. Unfortunately, you don't make it on
purpose.
> Secondly, this is more of a "saving face" adventure. I'm a nice guy by
> most personal accounts
ROFL!!!! Yeah, a nice guy!!!!! Thanks for this minute of laugh in
npm.general :-)
> and would hate to make fun a Daniel Glazman in
> future essays (etc)
Essays! BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! Yeah, the writings of Andras Konya are pure
litterature.
> for being ironically dead. But I guess *some*
> people have more arrogance and pride in themselves than simply to
> admit even a trivial mistake.
(1) you added my name in a Subject line, against all Netiquette
(2) each time you put your fingers on a keyboard, you prove once
more you're a proud stupid asshole kid. Keep going!
(3) final message
</Daniel>
MozillaCensorsMe
> MozillaCensorsMe wrote:
>
> > Please add a link to the actual discussion and make mention of the
> > irony and humor (that you obviously forgot about the first time you
> > read it). Having problems with interpreting irony online is a bit
> > difficult, but at least you could have read the prior posts.
>
> Bwahahaha. Irony and humour. Correction requested. Bwahaha!!!
> This _is_ humour, indeed. Unfortunately, you don't make it on
> purpose.
>
It is sad indeed that such trivial matters mean so much to you. It is
sad that you can't pick up the irony. But let me explain this very
tricky concept. You see, someone said that Linux had taken over
Berlin. Of course, the person exaggerated and it was Munich, a smaller
and different place indeed.
> > Secondly, this is more of a "saving face" adventure. I'm a nice guy by
> > most personal accounts
>
> ROFL!!!! Yeah, a nice guy!!!!! Thanks for this minute of laugh in
> npm.general :-)
>
Certainly nicer than I have been treated.
> > and would hate to make fun a Daniel Glazman in
> > future essays (etc)
>
> Essays! BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! Yeah, the writings of Andras Konya are pure
> litterature.
>
I use the American Heritage dictionary. It defines an essay as "A
short literary composition on a single subject, usually presenting the
personal view of the author." Personal view of the author... It
certainly seems to fit.
Perhaps you need to take a course on how to distinguish between
different types of writings. An essay by nature can include pretty
much anything with paragraphs, including things you ridicule because
you don't agree with them.
Hopefully, your MISSPELLING is intended. Though since it's pronounced
with two T's, I am guessing this is unintended irony. Very ironic, I
must note. You imply that I am a disgrace to literature, and then you
misspell it. No need to look that up, misspell is with two S's.
> > for being ironically dead. But I guess *some*
> > people have more arrogance and pride in themselves than simply to
> > admit even a trivial mistake.
>
> (1) you added my name in a Subject line, against all Netiquette
You didn't answer my other post on this very subject. I thought it'd
be nice to offer you another chance before my memory only caught onto
your idiocies, as with your email correspondence a year or so ago. In
those emails you said you were never going to talk to me, but oddly
you've changed your mind.
> (2) each time you put your fingers on a keyboard, you prove once
> more you're a proud stupid asshole kid. Keep going!
That's nice. A top-notch Mozilla programmer official guy (what's your
title?) calls pretty much a one-man opposition a "stupid asshole." If
I'm such a stupid asshole, as you've said similiar stuff to begin
with, why did you all the sudden start talking to me? The last time I
checked, stupid assholes with no points are ignored, right? Now it's a
bit too late, but it's worth pointing out.
Being nice nominally even, just so I can't make quotes like on my
website is good PR. It's not good for Mozilla to have people reading
Mozilla programmers call a teenager a "stupid asshole" for posting
messages.
Maybe you should take Remedial Marketing 101 instead of your English
Literature course at the nearest community college.
> (3) final message
>
That's what you said last time, and magically you came back to
chatting with me. Stop being like a little snot who swears he will
never to talk to the other person ever again. It avoids a lot of
confusion and unneccessary anger.
> </Daniel>
Maybe this message will be the basis for an essay for my site
showcasing the different types of Mozilla comedians. I don't know when
I'll finish, it's so hard to find clowns around here after all. So far
for the essay: You can't catch irony, you make fun of my crappy
liTTerature, though misspelling the operational word, calling me a
"stupid asshole" after misspelling it, etc.
I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as
much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more
chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo
many subjects.
David Tenser
> Daniel Glazman <dan...@glazman.org> wrote...
>>ROFL!!!! Yeah, a nice guy!!!!! Thanks for this minute of laugh in
>>npm.general :-)
> Certainly nicer than I have been treated.
Just for the record: I've seen you, Andras, called virtually everyone in
these newsgroups idiots, pathetic, ignorant and what not. And who
started all of this? You again Andras.
> I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as
> much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more
> chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo
> many subjects.
Well, that is your truth. Maybe it's time for you too cool off a bit too.
/ David
Rob Stow
> On 2003-08-20 01:51 MozillaCensorsMe wrote:
>
>
>> I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as
>> much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more
>> chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo
>> many subjects.
We're not ignoring you - you overestimate your importance.
We've merely kill-filled you. Ignoring you implies that
something has slipped past the filters and we had to make
the usual conscious decision to ignore you.
Most of us don't notice you until a troll-feeder - and I
guess that's what I'm doing now - responds to you and we
see your drivel quoted in the troll feeder's posting.
If you want people to start interacting with you, ask one of
the psych nurses on your ward to be a ghost writer for you.
MozillaCensorsMe
> David Tenser wrote:
> > On 2003-08-20 01:51 MozillaCensorsMe wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as
> >> much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more
> >> chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo
> >> many subjects.
>
> We're not ignoring you - you overestimate your importance.
>
Well you certainly aren't ignoring me, that's for sure.
> We've merely kill-filled you. Ignoring you implies that
> something has slipped past the filters and we had to make
> the usual conscious decision to ignore you.
>
So you inform me of this because...? I know. You WANT me to change
names every time I post. That can be arranged. And what do you know?
The killfile doesn't work at all then! Thanks for leading me to a
brilliant idea.
> Most of us don't notice you until a troll-feeder - and I
> guess that's what I'm doing now - responds to you and we
> see your drivel quoted in the troll feeder's posting.
>
I drove by my old elementary school a few days ago. Here's a few new
words that we all used that you can use instead of troll: "gay",
"nerd", "fag", "idiot", "snotball", "moron", and "loser". Please use
those instead as troll is getting old.
> If you want people to start interacting with you, ask one of
> the psych nurses on your ward to be a ghost writer for you.
Once again, we have illogic at work. When did I say I wanted people
"interacting" with me? I said that I don't care if anyone replies,
because I will keep writing. I don't have an audience per se.
OH BTW! This post was perhaps the most FRIVOLOUS I have read in a long
time. You basically say that I am not ignored, an irony in itself.
Then you say that people don't respond because they've killfiled me.
No shit. That of course never answered the quoted text. So people
killfile (or ignore me, it's all the same) because they realize the
more contact with me, the bigger chance to screw up and say something
hideously idiotic. Even minor screw-ups are enlarged by the fact that
an artificial barrier you all created in calling me a teenager. What
was the point of that? If I can do no right, then if I can tie my
shoe, I end up as if I found a cure for cancer.
On a much lighter note, I am still laughing my ass off how Daniel
Glazman complained on my supposedly low quality essays and then can't
spell literature correctly. Brilliance at work. With people like that,
no wonder Mozilla isn't going anywhere.
http://www.andkon.com/stuf/ The place for: "Essays! BWAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Yeah, the writings of Andras Konya are pure LITTERATURE."
MozillaCensorsMe
> On 2003-08-20 01:51 MozillaCensorsMe wrote:
> > Daniel Glazman <dan...@glazman.org> wrote...
> >>ROFL!!!! Yeah, a nice guy!!!!! Thanks for this minute of laugh in
> >>npm.general :-)
> > Certainly nicer than I have been treated.
>
> Just for the record: I've seen you, Andras, called virtually everyone in
> these newsgroups idiots, pathetic, ignorant and what not. And who
> started all of this? You again Andras.
>
I started it by saying "Mozilla is a bag of crap" a year ago, sure. I
didnt call anyone an idiot or anything similiar. I simply linked my
essay. Then, people started to call me an idiot, etc. Notwithstanding
I'm a teenager, as everyone loves to reinforce day in and day out, I'd
think I acted in a bit higher manner than at least some.
http://andkon.com/stuf/mozilla/
http://andkon.com/stuf/mozilla2/
In FACT, I was actually trying to be ON the side of Mozilla fans by my
mistaken belief at the time that it was fraud for AOL to get free
help. (The fraud still stands for me, but for slightly different
reasons.) Instead of saying, "Well, you have nice intentions, but
that's not what's happening" people basically said how much of an
idiot I was. Who was the first person to personally degrade someone?
Certainly not me, as it was my intention not to get people against my
side.
The emphasis of that first essay (and even after I had been called an
idiot, the second), apart from now incorrect things, was how AOL is
using Mozilla for its own use. And what do you that's pretty much how
it was. I realized how much a fragile, unfitting relationship Mozilla
and AOL had a year before any break occured. Kinda visionary in some
remote sense.
> > I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as
> > much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more
> > chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo
> > many subjects.
>
> Well, that is your truth. Maybe it's time for you too cool off a bit too.
>
Perhaps. I do have more interesting avenues to pursue for the moment:
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=20331
[Just so I can link back in the future. :-) ]
> / David
MozillaCensorsMe
And once again, my hypothesis that people stop talking so that they
don't make an ass out of themselves is proven correct. I make a good
point or correct a false "fact", and no one dares respond. Oh wait, we
have "troll feeders" who crap words out of their mouths along the line
of "Well you are an idiot anyways" or some other one-line slurs.