Remember Andras Konya, the guy who assimilated Mozilla imagery to the Nazis? He strikes back in netscape.public.mozilla.general. Here's a verbatim, don't laugh too loud, your neighbour is sleeping :-)
" Yes Munich seems to be a different place than Berlin. They arent even spelled the same. "
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Pathetic.
Please add a link to the actual discussion and make mention of the irony and humor (that you obviously forgot about the first time you read it). Having problems with interpreting irony online is a bit difficult, but at least you could have read the prior posts.
> Remember Andras Konya, the guy who assimilated Mozilla imagery to the > Nazis? He strikes back in netscape.public.mozilla.general. Here's a > verbatim, don't laugh too loud, your neighbour is sleeping :-)
> " Yes Munich seems to be a different place than Berlin. They arent > even spelled the same. "
> BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Pathetic.
> Please add a link to the actual discussion and make mention of the > irony and humor (that you obviously forgot about the first time you > read it). Having problems with interpreting irony online is a bit > difficult, but at least you could have read the prior posts.
First off, if you'd know what the hell you are talking about, then you'd know it's not polite to top post. These idiotic insults aren't worth my time or yours. If you'd actually care about what you said, you'd point out these situations where I should have shut up. But being a hypocrite like most other people, you'll generalize and come up with bland one-liners. And when you get slammed into the ground, you'll ooze away not wanting to continue your misery, despite the fact that you are a lot more anonymous than most (esp me).
Secondly, this is more of a "saving face" adventure. I'm a nice guy by most personal accounts and would hate to make fun a Daniel Glazman in future essays (etc) for being ironically dead. But I guess *some* people have more arrogance and pride in themselves than simply to admit even a trivial mistake.
MozillaCensorsMe wrote: > Please add a link to the actual discussion and make mention of the > irony and humor (that you obviously forgot about the first time you > read it). Having problems with interpreting irony online is a bit > difficult, but at least you could have read the prior posts.
Bwahahaha. Irony and humour. Correction requested. Bwahaha!!! This _is_ humour, indeed. Unfortunately, you don't make it on purpose.
> Secondly, this is more of a "saving face" adventure. I'm a nice guy by > most personal accounts
ROFL!!!! Yeah, a nice guy!!!!! Thanks for this minute of laugh in npm.general :-)
> and would hate to make fun a Daniel Glazman in > future essays (etc)
Essays! BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! Yeah, the writings of Andras Konya are pure litterature.
> for being ironically dead. But I guess *some* > people have more arrogance and pride in themselves than simply to > admit even a trivial mistake.
(1) you added my name in a Subject line, against all Netiquette (2) each time you put your fingers on a keyboard, you prove once more you're a proud stupid asshole kid. Keep going! (3) final message
> > Please add a link to the actual discussion and make mention of the > > irony and humor (that you obviously forgot about the first time you > > read it). Having problems with interpreting irony online is a bit > > difficult, but at least you could have read the prior posts.
> Bwahahaha. Irony and humour. Correction requested. Bwahaha!!! > This _is_ humour, indeed. Unfortunately, you don't make it on > purpose.
It is sad indeed that such trivial matters mean so much to you. It is sad that you can't pick up the irony. But let me explain this very tricky concept. You see, someone said that Linux had taken over Berlin. Of course, the person exaggerated and it was Munich, a smaller and different place indeed.
> > Secondly, this is more of a "saving face" adventure. I'm a nice guy by > > most personal accounts
> ROFL!!!! Yeah, a nice guy!!!!! Thanks for this minute of laugh in > npm.general :-)
Certainly nicer than I have been treated.
> > and would hate to make fun a Daniel Glazman in > > future essays (etc)
> Essays! BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! Yeah, the writings of Andras Konya are pure > litterature.
I use the American Heritage dictionary. It defines an essay as "A short literary composition on a single subject, usually presenting the personal view of the author." Personal view of the author... It certainly seems to fit.
Perhaps you need to take a course on how to distinguish between different types of writings. An essay by nature can include pretty much anything with paragraphs, including things you ridicule because you don't agree with them.
Hopefully, your MISSPELLING is intended. Though since it's pronounced with two T's, I am guessing this is unintended irony. Very ironic, I must note. You imply that I am a disgrace to literature, and then you misspell it. No need to look that up, misspell is with two S's.
> > for being ironically dead. But I guess *some* > > people have more arrogance and pride in themselves than simply to > > admit even a trivial mistake.
> (1) you added my name in a Subject line, against all Netiquette
You didn't answer my other post on this very subject. I thought it'd be nice to offer you another chance before my memory only caught onto your idiocies, as with your email correspondence a year or so ago. In those emails you said you were never going to talk to me, but oddly you've changed your mind.
> (2) each time you put your fingers on a keyboard, you prove once > more you're a proud stupid asshole kid. Keep going!
That's nice. A top-notch Mozilla programmer official guy (what's your title?) calls pretty much a one-man opposition a "stupid asshole." If I'm such a stupid asshole, as you've said similiar stuff to begin with, why did you all the sudden start talking to me? The last time I checked, stupid assholes with no points are ignored, right? Now it's a bit too late, but it's worth pointing out.
Being nice nominally even, just so I can't make quotes like on my website is good PR. It's not good for Mozilla to have people reading Mozilla programmers call a teenager a "stupid asshole" for posting messages.
Maybe you should take Remedial Marketing 101 instead of your English Literature course at the nearest community college.
> (3) final message
That's what you said last time, and magically you came back to chatting with me. Stop being like a little snot who swears he will never to talk to the other person ever again. It avoids a lot of confusion and unneccessary anger.
> </Daniel>
Maybe this message will be the basis for an essay for my site showcasing the different types of Mozilla comedians. I don't know when I'll finish, it's so hard to find clowns around here after all. So far for the essay: You can't catch irony, you make fun of my crappy liTTerature, though misspelling the operational word, calling me a "stupid asshole" after misspelling it, etc.
I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo many subjects.
> Daniel Glazman <dan...@glazman.org> wrote... >>ROFL!!!! Yeah, a nice guy!!!!! Thanks for this minute of laugh in >>npm.general :-) > Certainly nicer than I have been treated.
Just for the record: I've seen you, Andras, called virtually everyone in these newsgroups idiots, pathetic, ignorant and what not. And who started all of this? You again Andras.
> I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as > much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more > chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo > many subjects.
Well, that is your truth. Maybe it's time for you too cool off a bit too.
David Tenser wrote: > On 2003-08-20 01:51 MozillaCensorsMe wrote:
>> I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as >> much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more >> chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo >> many subjects.
We're not ignoring you - you overestimate your importance.
We've merely kill-filled you. Ignoring you implies that something has slipped past the filters and we had to make the usual conscious decision to ignore you.
Most of us don't notice you until a troll-feeder - and I guess that's what I'm doing now - responds to you and we see your drivel quoted in the troll feeder's posting.
If you want people to start interacting with you, ask one of the psych nurses on your ward to be a ghost writer for you.
Rob Stow <rob.s...@sasktel.net> wrote in message <news:bhuu1j$bab2@ripley.netscape.com>... > David Tenser wrote: > > On 2003-08-20 01:51 MozillaCensorsMe wrote:
> >> I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as > >> much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more > >> chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo > >> many subjects.
> We're not ignoring you - you overestimate your importance.
Well you certainly aren't ignoring me, that's for sure.
> We've merely kill-filled you. Ignoring you implies that > something has slipped past the filters and we had to make > the usual conscious decision to ignore you.
So you inform me of this because...? I know. You WANT me to change names every time I post. That can be arranged. And what do you know? The killfile doesn't work at all then! Thanks for leading me to a brilliant idea.
> Most of us don't notice you until a troll-feeder - and I > guess that's what I'm doing now - responds to you and we > see your drivel quoted in the troll feeder's posting.
I drove by my old elementary school a few days ago. Here's a few new words that we all used that you can use instead of troll: "gay", "nerd", "fag", "idiot", "snotball", "moron", and "loser". Please use those instead as troll is getting old.
> If you want people to start interacting with you, ask one of > the psych nurses on your ward to be a ghost writer for you.
Once again, we have illogic at work. When did I say I wanted people "interacting" with me? I said that I don't care if anyone replies, because I will keep writing. I don't have an audience per se.
OH BTW! This post was perhaps the most FRIVOLOUS I have read in a long time. You basically say that I am not ignored, an irony in itself. Then you say that people don't respond because they've killfiled me. No shit. That of course never answered the quoted text. So people killfile (or ignore me, it's all the same) because they realize the more contact with me, the bigger chance to screw up and say something hideously idiotic. Even minor screw-ups are enlarged by the fact that an artificial barrier you all created in calling me a teenager. What was the point of that? If I can do no right, then if I can tie my shoe, I end up as if I found a cure for cancer.
On a much lighter note, I am still laughing my ass off how Daniel Glazman complained on my supposedly low quality essays and then can't spell literature correctly. Brilliance at work. With people like that, no wonder Mozilla isn't going anywhere.
http://www.andkon.com/stuf/ The place for: "Essays! BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! Yeah, the writings of Andras Konya are pure LITTERATURE."
David Tenser <david.tenser_at_comhem.se> wrote in message <news:bhugi5$bak3@ripley.netscape.com>... > On 2003-08-20 01:51 MozillaCensorsMe wrote: > > Daniel Glazman <dan...@glazman.org> wrote... > >>ROFL!!!! Yeah, a nice guy!!!!! Thanks for this minute of laugh in > >>npm.general :-) > > Certainly nicer than I have been treated.
> Just for the record: I've seen you, Andras, called virtually everyone in > these newsgroups idiots, pathetic, ignorant and what not. And who > started all of this? You again Andras.
I started it by saying "Mozilla is a bag of crap" a year ago, sure. I didnt call anyone an idiot or anything similiar. I simply linked my essay. Then, people started to call me an idiot, etc. Notwithstanding I'm a teenager, as everyone loves to reinforce day in and day out, I'd think I acted in a bit higher manner than at least some.
In FACT, I was actually trying to be ON the side of Mozilla fans by my mistaken belief at the time that it was fraud for AOL to get free help. (The fraud still stands for me, but for slightly different reasons.) Instead of saying, "Well, you have nice intentions, but that's not what's happening" people basically said how much of an idiot I was. Who was the first person to personally degrade someone? Certainly not me, as it was my intention not to get people against my side.
The emphasis of that first essay (and even after I had been called an idiot, the second), apart from now incorrect things, was how AOL is using Mozilla for its own use. And what do you that's pretty much how it was. I realized how much a fragile, unfitting relationship Mozilla and AOL had a year before any break occured. Kinda visionary in some remote sense.
> > I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as > > much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more > > chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo > > many subjects.
> Well, that is your truth. Maybe it's time for you too cool off a bit too.
mozillacensor...@yahoo.com (MozillaCensorsMe) wrote in message <news:39665a4.0308201622.55f26dbc@posting.google.com>... > David Tenser <david.tenser_at_comhem.se> wrote in message <news:bhugi5$bak3@ripley.netscape.com>... > > On 2003-08-20 01:51 MozillaCensorsMe wrote: > > > Daniel Glazman <dan...@glazman.org> wrote... > > >>ROFL!!!! Yeah, a nice guy!!!!! Thanks for this minute of laugh in > > >>npm.general :-) > > > Certainly nicer than I have been treated.
> > Just for the record: I've seen you, Andras, called virtually everyone in > > these newsgroups idiots, pathetic, ignorant and what not. And who > > started all of this? You again Andras.
> I started it by saying "Mozilla is a bag of crap" a year ago, sure. I > didnt call anyone an idiot or anything similiar. I simply linked my > essay. Then, people started to call me an idiot, etc. Notwithstanding > I'm a teenager, as everyone loves to reinforce day in and day out, I'd > think I acted in a bit higher manner than at least some.
> In FACT, I was actually trying to be ON the side of Mozilla fans by my > mistaken belief at the time that it was fraud for AOL to get free > help. (The fraud still stands for me, but for slightly different > reasons.) Instead of saying, "Well, you have nice intentions, but > that's not what's happening" people basically said how much of an > idiot I was. Who was the first person to personally degrade someone? > Certainly not me, as it was my intention not to get people against my > side.
> The emphasis of that first essay (and even after I had been called an > idiot, the second), apart from now incorrect things, was how AOL is > using Mozilla for its own use. And what do you that's pretty much how > it was. I realized how much a fragile, unfitting relationship Mozilla > and AOL had a year before any break occured. Kinda visionary in some > remote sense.
> > > I know the reason people here are cooling off and not responding as > > > much to my messages: The more you all communicate with me, the more > > > chance you all have to display you all's ignorance that covers soooo > > > many subjects.
> > Well, that is your truth. Maybe it's time for you too cool off a bit too.
And once again, my hypothesis that people stop talking so that they don't make an ass out of themselves is proven correct. I make a good point or correct a false "fact", and no one dares respond. Oh wait, we have "troll feeders" who crap words out of their mouths along the line of "Well you are an idiot anyways" or some other one-line slurs.
|
