Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: jimmy.arma...@gmail.com
To: netconfx@googlegroups.com
Cc: jimmy.arma...@gmail.com
Message-Id: <abb92e5f-3696-478c-b161-69d11cc28787@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <7584ab53-7b67-4a16-987b-796653794047@c30g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
References: <7584ab53-7b67-4a16-987b-796653794047@c30g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Slow Response with huge dataset
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_737_1332622.1347470733322"

------=_Part_737_1332622.1347470733322
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_738_16583637.1347470733322"

------=_Part_738_16583637.1347470733322
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Good afternoon.
I know it's long, but the case was closed and reopened now. I found the=20
problem. I made =E2=80=8B=E2=80=8Ba change to your code so now I can have t=
he complete=20
configurations of our Junipers in less than 5 seconds vs 41 seconds (which=
=20
was unacceptable for us).

I think my boss will be happy ... :)

On Friday, 4 May 2012 16:31:13 UTC-4, Jimmy Armand wrote:
>
> Hi=20
> First, let me say that Netconfx is an excellent API. It works very=20
> well with our equipment.=20
>
> But we have a problem when we want to retrieve large data sets. In=20
> fact it is 3 Mega of resources that needs to be downloaded and=20
> manipulated. But those three megas take almost a minute to recover. It=20
> seems that NetconfX use Dom to work the xml I guess that's why or=20
> maybe i'm missing something?=20
>
> Is there any optimal way to get large data sets?=20
>
> thx!=20
> Jimmy


------=_Part_738_16583637.1347470733322
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<span id=3D"result_box" class=3D"" lang=3D"en"><span class=3D"hps">Good aft=
ernoon.</span><br> <span class=3D"hps">I</span> <span class=3D"hps">know it=
's</span> <span class=3D"hps">long, but</span> <span class=3D"hps">the case=
 was</span> <span class=3D"hps">closed and</span> <span class=3D"hps">reope=
ned</span> <span class=3D"hps">now</span><span>.</span> <span class=3D"hps"=
>I found</span> <span class=3D"hps">the problem.</span> <span class=3D"hps"=
>I</span> <span class=3D"hps">made =E2=80=8B=E2=80=8Ba change to</span> <sp=
an class=3D"hps">your</span> <span class=3D"hps">code</span> <span class=3D=
"hps">so now I</span> <span class=3D"hps">can have the</span> <span class=
=3D"hps">complete</span> <span class=3D"hps">configurations</span> <span cl=
ass=3D"hps">of our</span> <span class=3D"hps">Junipers</span> <span class=
=3D"hps">in</span> <span class=3D"hps">less than 5 seconds</span> <span cla=
ss=3D"hps">vs 41</span> <span class=3D"hps">seconds</span> <span class=3D"h=
ps atn">(</span><span>which was unacceptable</span> <span class=3D"hps">for=
 us).</span><br><br> <span class=3D"hps">I think my</span> <span class=3D"h=
ps">boss</span> <span class=3D"hps">will be happy</span> <span class=3D"hps=
">...</span> <span class=3D"hps">:)</span></span><br><br>On Friday, 4 May 2=
012 16:31:13 UTC-4, Jimmy Armand  wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-le=
ft: 1ex;">Hi
<br>First, let me say that Netconfx is an excellent API. It works very
<br>well with our equipment.
<br>
<br>But we have a problem when we want to retrieve large data sets. In
<br>fact it is 3 Mega of resources that needs to be downloaded and
<br>manipulated. But those three megas take almost a minute to recover. It
<br>seems that NetconfX use Dom to work the xml I guess that's why or
<br>maybe i'm missing something?
<br>
<br>Is there any optimal way to get large data sets?
<br>
<br>thx!
<br>Jimmy</blockquote>
------=_Part_738_16583637.1347470733322--

------=_Part_737_1332622.1347470733322--