<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>net.works Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Need Help With Sun Ethernet Problems</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/6a003d97ad08ed8c/1c28380e6296cfce?show_docid=1c28380e6296cfce</link>
  <description>
  We have a large number of Sun workstations configured into a &lt;br&gt; network of 7 file servers and approximately 50 diskless client &lt;br&gt; workstations. Since installing the machines we have experienced &lt;br&gt; a collection of what appears to be ethernet related problems or &lt;br&gt; at least that is what the error messages on the Suns lead you to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/6a003d97ad08ed8c/1c28380e6296cfce?show_docid=1c28380e6296cfce</guid>
  <author>
  how...@unc.uucp
  (William Howell)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 1986 06:18:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>4.2BSD on HP workstation</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/baa7e1004ce9de3a/e8dd3f780c41e2b6?show_docid=e8dd3f780c41e2b6</link>
  <description>
  +++++++++++++++++++ &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m at UCLA and we would like to run 4.3 bsd on our hp 9000 &lt;br&gt; workstations. Then we could attach them to the ethernet and use the &lt;br&gt; RFS to get network file transparency with our other 4.3 machines, I &lt;br&gt; believe. &lt;br&gt; I posted a message here a while ago asking whether anyone had ported &lt;br&gt; 4.3 and nobody answered yes. If someone has (and would be so kind
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/baa7e1004ce9de3a/e8dd3f780c41e2b6?show_docid=e8dd3f780c41e2b6</guid>
  <author>
  a...@ucla-cs.arpa
  (Arthur Goldberg)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 1986 18:15:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Announcing X window system mailing lists.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/79d7787d9674efbd/f2746c8826cf5ce3?show_docid=f2746c8826cf5ce3</link>
  <description>
  I have now had substantial numbers of requests for a mailing list on X &lt;br&gt; window system related issues. I had hoped that people receiving X &lt;br&gt; distributions from MIT would be kind enough to give their electronic &lt;br&gt; mail addresses on the order form, but many did not, and the distribution &lt;br&gt; of X on the 4.3BSD tape will result in many more distributions of X over
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/79d7787d9674efbd/f2746c8826cf5ce3?show_docid=f2746c8826cf5ce3</guid>
  <author>
  j...@athena.mit.edu
  (Jim Gettys)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 1986 02:31:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Bad Memory in Suns - Anyone Know?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/3e40489d5c5ccbc8/892b22f08a9a6634?show_docid=892b22f08a9a6634</link>
  <description>
  Your information is very old. SUN got some bad chips from &lt;br&gt; Micron in Idaho (now refered to as mutant spudboy chips). &lt;br&gt; Apparently there is a suit still active, but I haven&#39;t heard &lt;br&gt; anything in about a year. These chips were used in some &lt;br&gt; of the SUN 2&#39;s. &lt;br&gt; Micron, alleged manufacturer of the allegedly defective chips,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/3e40489d5c5ccbc8/892b22f08a9a6634?show_docid=892b22f08a9a6634</guid>
  <author>
  j...@portal.uucp
  (John Little)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 1986 10:01:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Want Benchmarking info for SUN2s and SUN3s</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/de918e8aaba0814f/5cf0a8b9af07e6d6?show_docid=5cf0a8b9af07e6d6</link>
  <description>
  I am after information about the speed of Sun2s and Sun3s. &lt;br&gt; I am looking for information about &lt;br&gt; * Comparison of Sun2s to Sun3s &lt;br&gt; * Math speed (floating and integer) &lt;br&gt; * Ethernet load/usage &lt;br&gt; * User responsiveness (Has anyone done a study of how many SUNs a &lt;br&gt; file server can have on it before the NFS demands overwhelm it,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/de918e8aaba0814f/5cf0a8b9af07e6d6?show_docid=5cf0a8b9af07e6d6</guid>
  <author>
  hartw...@lll-lcc.uucp
  (David M. Hartwell)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 1986 17:49:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Sun panel subwindow input problem. Help?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/926074e0d3a08190/b8ceece6b81d016e?show_docid=b8ceece6b81d016e</link>
  <description>
  Can anyone suggest how to solve the following input problem on a Sun? &lt;br&gt; I have a panel subwindow in which I have one panel item of type &lt;br&gt; PANEL_TEXT. I want to display the panel item, get user input, &lt;br&gt; change the prompt, get user input etc &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve thought up a crummy solution using a list of prompts and their
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/926074e0d3a08190/b8ceece6b81d016e?show_docid=b8ceece6b81d016e</guid>
  <author>
  da...@comp.lancs.ac.uk
  (David Coffield)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 1986 10:07:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Viewpoint is similar to, but different from, Star</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/f7c359f9164330cb/893739faced9aff6?show_docid=893739faced9aff6</link>
  <description>
  One recent message implied that Xerox Viewpoint is the 1981 Star product &lt;br&gt; simply renamed. Not true. As delivered, Viewpoint provides generally the same &lt;br&gt; functionality, but it is noticeably faster, a good deal of the interface &lt;br&gt; has been changed (e.g. overlapping windows in arbitrary positions are &lt;br&gt; allowed now), and quite importantly, it has been unbundled. Star was a
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/f7c359f9164330cb/893739faced9aff6?show_docid=893739faced9aff6</guid>
  <author>
  pet...@utcsri.uucp
  (Peter Rowley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 1986 14:03:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Sun blues.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/bdec76fd9d537c44/83ff1b8c94e01196?show_docid=83ff1b8c94e01196</link>
  <description>
  This may have been brought up before, but if it has, PLEEZ refer me to the &lt;br&gt; article the solution is in. &lt;br&gt; Hokay. I have a Sun Version 2.0 workstation and this is what I want a tool to &lt;br&gt; do: &lt;br&gt; 1. Emulate a terminal when open. &lt;br&gt; 2. When closed, have an icon that alters. (i.e. blinks) &lt;br&gt; So far, I can emulate the terminal (basically sun&#39;s &amp;quot;Shelltool&amp;quot;) *alone*,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/bdec76fd9d537c44/83ff1b8c94e01196?show_docid=83ff1b8c94e01196</guid>
  <author>
  dnel...@joevax.uucp
  (Dorothy Nelson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 1986 20:35:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Workstations (Re: &lt;15@uw-atm.UUCP&gt;)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/db96ab595acbd2c3/0603e958863b6929?show_docid=0603e958863b6929</link>
  <description>
  This article was originally sent just to net.works on May 1. Since I &lt;br&gt; do not receive net.works, please E-mail responses to me. If &lt;br&gt; they are interesting enough, I will post them to Usenet. &lt;br&gt; ----- &lt;br&gt; I work for an Atmospheric Sciences Department. We are looking at &lt;br&gt; different workstations for manipulation and display of graphical
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/db96ab595acbd2c3/0603e958863b6929?show_docid=0603e958863b6929</guid>
  <author>
  ha...@uw-atm.uucp
  (harry)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 1986 18:04:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>(relatively) cheap Unix boxes summary</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/e1a3524b566ab622/4638416b849b9a5a?show_docid=4638416b849b9a5a</link>
  <description>
  Since I didn&#39;t see the original posting, I don&#39;t know if these Unix &lt;br&gt; boxes fit the criteria. However, most of the boxes mentioned don&#39;t fit &lt;br&gt; into my idea of cheap. If you are looking for a cheap Unix box for &lt;br&gt; personal use, here are a few possibilities. &lt;br&gt; $3250 -	Cyb Systems Workmate I &lt;br&gt; 8MHz M68000, 1MB memory (512K no wait state, 512K Multibus mem),
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/e1a3524b566ab622/4638416b849b9a5a?show_docid=4638416b849b9a5a</guid>
  <author>
  l...@cyb-eng.uucp
  (Bill Lee)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1986 22:50:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Trying to locate surveys of CAD/CAM workstations.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/ba7753c15211e2db/3132725a4cc72284?show_docid=3132725a4cc72284</link>
  <description>
  A fellow I work with has asked if I knew about any surveys &lt;br&gt; (even better: benchmarks) of CAD/CAM workstations. Quite &lt;br&gt; naturally, I thought of all you out there in Usenet-land. &lt;br&gt; Has anything appropriate been posted to this or any other &lt;br&gt; newsgroup? Can you point me at someone who can help? &lt;br&gt; He&#39;s not a usenet user (yet), and this site is so new that
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/ba7753c15211e2db/3132725a4cc72284?show_docid=3132725a4cc72284</guid>
  <author>
  j...@cdx39.uucp
  (jc)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1986 15:36:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Graphical Workstations</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/9370a03402d08a1c/5341ad35eafcdb80?show_docid=5341ad35eafcdb80</link>
  <description>
  I am planning on purchasing a UNIX based graphical &lt;br&gt; workstation for performing real time simulation &lt;br&gt; of wire frame and solid models. I have seen the &lt;br&gt; IRIS 3030 but only a video tape of the Apollo DN580. &lt;br&gt; Does anyone have any information on how the performance &lt;br&gt; of these two machines compare? Are there any other systems
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/9370a03402d08a1c/5341ad35eafcdb80?show_docid=5341ad35eafcdb80</guid>
  <author>
  r...@sickkids.uucp
  (Russell Sutherland)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1986 12:12:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>CPU overhead of X on a VAXstation II?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/b4586842b898b0f2/d10c69a35568e50d?show_docid=d10c69a35568e50d</link>
  <description>
  The VS-2 and VS-2/RC (VAXstation II) uses the QVSS display, which is &lt;br&gt; memory on the Q-Bus. There is NO hardware assist. When scrolling or &lt;br&gt; painting text, therefore, the CPU is compute bound manipulating display &lt;br&gt; memory. X is a user level process, and so will be timeshared like any &lt;br&gt; other process. This means that in a timeshared environment, the window
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/b4586842b898b0f2/d10c69a35568e50d?show_docid=d10c69a35568e50d</guid>
  <author>
  j...@mit-eddie.mit.edu
  (Jim Gettys)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 1986 00:01:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>xeroX slime ad warning (really Meta 4)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/446689fb3db5ede8/06a65a2744f52f6d?show_docid=06a65a2744f52f6d</link>
  <description>
  --------- &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m afraid Bob Lewis is &amp;quot;mixing his metaphors&amp;quot;: &lt;br&gt; Just to put things in perspective, one of the big plusses of &lt;br&gt; the Sigma-7 was its programmable microcode, and the gang at &lt;br&gt; UCSD was really looking forward to getting a machine which &lt;br&gt; could emulate an IBM 1130! The name of the emulating OS was
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/446689fb3db5ede8/06a65a2744f52f6d?show_docid=06a65a2744f52f6d</guid>
  <author>
  mcjo...@magic.uucp
  (mcjones)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1986 17:53:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>(relatively) cheap Unix boxes summary</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/e1a3524b566ab622/e0fc9588b382906c?show_docid=e0fc9588b382906c</link>
  <description>
  What follows are the response given to my query regarding inexpensive Unix &lt;br&gt; boxen. I&#39;ve followed up on some of these. My personal decision is to wait &lt;br&gt; until I can afford a 68020 w/ 4 serials, 2 ||&#39;s, ethernet, 4meg, color graph, &lt;br&gt; 200meg disk &amp;amp; 1/2 tape. However, I wish to be self sufficient. If you want
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/net.works/browse_thread/thread/e1a3524b566ab622/e0fc9588b382906c?show_docid=e0fc9588b382906c</guid>
  <author>
  la...@geowhiz.uucp
  (Larry McVoy)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 1986 04:25:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
