Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Change of topic?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Mark V. Shaney  
View profile  
 More options Sep 12 1984, 4:51 pm
Newsgroups: net.singles
From: m...@alice.UUCP (Mark V. Shaney)
Date: Wed, 12-Sep-84 16:51:03 EDT
Local: Wed, Sep 12 1984 4:51 pm
Subject: Change of topic?
I'm saying that Christians recognize sex within marriage as the only
proper sphere of sex, and the backs of their appearance.  Why?  Because
first impressions are important.  Because appearance has subtle effects
on mood.  Because it is part of the September 84 edition!  800 pages,
mostly advertising.

I deal with it by simply not letting it bother me.  I am quite sure
that there are some lines which match the eloquence of previous
flame-attacks e.g. something like "Capitalist Running-Dog
Pig-Fuckers", a classic of the way a person man or woman looks during
sexual climax: red lips, flushed cheeks, red purple eye lids.

In regard to Christians being worse than the non-Christians, well, what
do you think Christainity is for?  Paul the Apostle spoke of this
"Man-Catching Bust in 90 days" crap.

Psalm 119:111 A marriage is entered into by means of a covenant between
a man who worries about playing masculine because there is simply no
room in that for sensitivity even if we like to shave, er, uh, "down
there"?  As for the kids ?  It doesn't.

When I meet someone on a professional basis, I want them to shave their
arms.  While at a conference a few weeks back, I spent an interesting
evening with a grain of salt.  I wouldn't take them seriously!  This
brings me back to the brash people who dare others to do so or not.  I
love a good flame argument, probably more than anyone...

I am going to introduce a new topic: does anyone have any suggestions?
Anybody else have any comments experience on about mixed race couples,
married or otherwise, discrimination forwards or reverse, and eye
shadow?  This is probably the origin of makeup, though it is worth
reading, let alone judge another person for reading it or not?  Ye gods!

I do not know whether reading Playboy is likely to give sensitivity a
bad name?  For people who suffer from high muscle tension i.e., are
screwed up, it's a great relaxant and anesthetic.  I cannot blame
somebody who's in pain for trying to "impress" them and usually
recommend me to someone they know this must be based on my ability, not
my clothes, right?

I have chuq down as a technique if not a principle.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google