> According to the Dean of Undergraduate Affairs at > IIT Delhi, Prof. Ray, "the Indian government must > do something to tackle with this problem... We > can ask students seeking admission to the IITs to > sign a bond to serve the nation for a minimum > period of 10 yers. I do not know how far this > wil be successful, but there is no harm in trying > out a proposal." > According to a England-based journal Nature, the > ratio of students returning to India after > attaining a doctorate degree is only 18%.
The honorable professor might not have realized that one major reason the IITs are institutes of excellence is the student body at each of them. A restriction like this may mean that over the long term, those bright students will begin looking elsewhere.
Living and studying in a foriegn country broadens the mind. People who are thus trained are extremely valuable. I think that the percentage of people that do go back is sufficient repayment for the investment the Indian Govt. puts into each graduate, IIT or otherwise.
The Taiwaneese, Greek and Turkish Govt's ask for ?two? years of military service. 10 years of "serve the nation"? Most people would turn to the Indian Institutes of Marketing (I know,..) and to careers in selling soaps, instead of doing technical things.
>Kapur@ge-crd writes : > > According to the Dean of Undergraduate Affairs at > > IIT Delhi, Prof. Ray, "the Indian government must > > do something to tackle with this problem... We > > can ask students seeking admission to the IITs to > > sign a bond to serve the nation for a minimum > > period of 10 yers. I do not know how far this
^^ Whoa ! TEN years ? And what does "serve the nation" mean ?
> > According to a England-based journal Nature, the > > ratio of students returning to India after > > attaining a doctorate degree is only 18%.
^^ Pretty low isn't it ? But what about those who return to India after a Master's degree ? And how what are the percentages for IIT students ? A lot of students studying for doctoral degrees are from other universities / colleges. Why shouldn't similar measures be contemplated for them ? Please remember that University education NO MATTER WHERE in India is heavily subsidised by the government ( and hence the country and hence the tax-payer ).
I feel that the focus on the IITs is much more for the high profile and the image they have in the public eye that they are centres of excellence ( myth or reality ? ) Ditto for doctors. I feel sick when people talk of lack of commitment on part of doctors considering they get such a shoddy deal back home. ( Need a doc (:-) )
> The honorable professor might not have realized that one major > reason the IITs are institutes of excellence is the student
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ Whatever that means. As for student bodies at them -- not as militant as in other univs, but not drastically different: perhaps the only difference is that they feel they can *do it*, rather than whine.
> body at each of them. A restriction like this may mean that > over the long term, those bright students will begin looking elsewhere.
^^^^^^^^^ I want to know how many people join IITs with the express intention of going (coming?) abroad ? Mostly, people are undecided about the future, or so I concluded. Are there any "elsewhere"s worthwhile right now?
> Living and studying in a foriegn country broadens the mind.
^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ No kidding ? But seriously, you'll be surprised how little it really does. In fact, I've been horrified to see people with prejudices ( racial / political / social / etc. ) as thick as a tank's armour while *broadening their minds*. Well, maybe they would have been worse otherwise ! I've seen some people turn from vulgar people to better-off vulgar people ( they are fatter and dress better ).
> People who are thus trained are extremely valuable.
> The Taiwaneese, Greek and Turkish Govt's ask for ?two? years > of military service. 10 years of "serve the nation"? Most people
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
10 years of serving the nation is better than 2 years of military service. Amen.
In article <6...@epistemi.UUCP> muk...@epistemi.UUCP (Mukesh Patel) writes: >In article <6...@philabs.UUCP> >>> According to the Dean of Undergraduate Affairs at >>> IIT Delhi, Prof. Ray, "the Indian government must >>> do something to tackle with this problem... We >>> can ask students seeking admission to the IITs to >>> sign a bond to serve the nation for a minimum >>> period of 10 years.
>I have no idea by how much the Indian state subsidises these students' >education but surely there can be nothing wrong in a country demanding >that its graduates having taken advantage of the system do their >bit for it. Ali's comment
>>A (10 year) restriction like this may mean that >>over the long term, those bright students will begin looking elsewhere.
>Makes little sense unless he means that Indian student would do their >first degrees abroad. That's fine as long as they are not benefiting >from the state system. But I think he means that these bright young >things would attend OTHER colleges and universities in India. Well >in that case I think they should be obliged in the same manner to >remain in India and contribute to the country's technological and >economical development.
>> Living and studying in a foreign country broadens the mind.
>It also fattens ones bank balance. Let's call a spade a spade. I bet >about 90% of you expats would not mind working in India if only the >pay was comparable to US.
>> People who are thus trained are extremely valuable.
>You got it! That's why the "learned professor" would like to >see you lot stick around in India to do your bit for YOUR country.
>>>........ the ratio of students returning to India after >>> attaining a doctorate degree is only 18%.
>To which Ali responds >> I think that the percentage of people that do go back is sufficient >> repayment for the investment the Indian Govt. puts into each graduate, >> IIT or otherwise.
>So when is your bit of 18% going to go over and repay the Indian >Govt? Perhaps the issue is whether you care enough about India >and its people rather than whether you should repay anything to >the Indian Govt. The Govt, I am sure Ali is well aware, raises the >money from the people with which it then educates a small elite >who more often than not simply packs up and buggers off to foreign >lands because there is no PERSONAL advantages to be gained by >remaining behind once they get their first/second degrees.
>I am surprised that these students fail to notice that in providing them >with the best education and facilities that India can afford the >country as a whole makes sacrifices in other areas such as medical >care and primary education. A lot of politicians and academic >stomach the elitism of further education in India in the hope that >the product of it could be deployed to improve the lot of the >rest of the less fortunate population.
>Instead of which the Indian people get a kick in the balls which >is what remarks like the following add up to.
>> The Taiwaneese, Greek and Turkish Govt's ask for ?two? years >> of military service. 10 years of "serve the nation"? Most people >> would turn to the Indian Institutes of Marketing (I know,..) >> and to careers in selling soaps, instead of doing technical >> things.
>> Ali Shaik ..ihnp4!philabs!ams
>Maybe selling soap is better than having to justify ones selfishness.
>mukesh patel
>I live and study in Britain. I was born in Uganda of Indian parents >both of whom came from Gujarat. I have visited India twice in my life. >And I am determined to remain and work in Britain after my PhD rather >than go to the states even though the pay here is terrible. Perhaps >Britain (and India) would be a better place if more people took into >account their duty to their fellow citizens.
WELL Said Mukesh! I fully agree with you. As an Indian acaademic working in Britain, I frequently receive enquires from Indians for research jobs in Universities. Some of these guys are Very Good. Should I offer them a job? (I some times do have vacancies).I do feel guilty of robbing! I have one person working with me. He is VERY GOOD. If he does return to India after a few years, he will be tremendously useful there. Most Indian academics I have met (mostly in the US) do not seem to be bothered by this fact. I on the other hand do feel guilty of being a party to the brain drain. I have no solution though.
>>> can ask students seeking admission to the IITs to >>> sign a bond to serve the nation for a minimum >>> period of 10 years. > things would attend OTHER colleges and universities in India. Well > in that case I think they should be obliged in the same manner to > remain in India and contribute to the country's technological and > economical development.
Following up this & an earlier criticism of my posting: Perhaps I used too strong a language in response to the 10 year idea. I wasn't justifying mine or other IIT graduates selfishness- won't get into thoughts about my personal plans here. It seems the 10 year restriction for IIT (or other) graduates would hurt more than it would help. It would lead to (1) Fewer IIT graduates remaining in the technological areas they were trained for and (2) Fewer or *ZERO* faculty and personnel in technical enterprises in India, with the benefit of having had training in technologically advanced countries. Not too many people would want to do their PhDs while in their early thirties.
> In article <6...@philabs.UUCP> > > [IIT Dean wants students to sign a 10 year bond] > >>........ the ratio of students returning to India after > >> attaining a doctorate degree is only 18%.
> To which Ali responds > > I think that the percentage of people that do go back is sufficient > > repayment for the investment the Indian Govt. puts into each graduate, > > IIT or otherwise.
> So when is your bit of 18% going to go over and repay the Indian > Govt?
I am not sure what Patel is trying to say. The point was 18% of Indian students who get their doctorates in the US return to India. NOT that 18% OF each student returns. (I am sorry, everything below your left knee has to get on the next plane to Bombay. The rest of you may stay.)
> I am surprised that these students fail to notice that in providing them > with the best education and facilities that India can afford the > country as a whole makes sacrifices in other areas such as medical > care and primary education. . > I live and study in Britain. I was born in Uganda of Indian parents > both of whom came from Gujarat. I have visited India twice in my life.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Obviously I may be wrong, given your vast knowlege of India and her people, but it seems to me that if the financial aid that the Indian Govt gives the IITs were spent elsewhere, it wouldnt make too much of a difference in the lifestyle of the average Indian. But it would make it very difficult for a student from a poor household to attend a good school.
> A lot of politicians and academic > stomach the elitism of further education in India..
Further education in India is elitist in that the entrance requirements for good engineering and medical schools are very high. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to get a decent job without a degree. For instance, one needs a degree in commerce at least, to get a job as a bank teller. Thus, further education is a necessity, not a luxury.
> I live and study in Britain. I was born in Uganda of Indian parents > both of whom came from Gujarat. I have visited India twice in my life. > And I am determined to remain and work in Britain after my PhD rather > than go to the states even though the pay here is terrible.
> mukesh patel
Very laudable! Why did your parents leave India? I'll bet it was for economic reasons. Following your line of reasoning, didnt they have a duty to remain in India and contribute to the country's economy in any way they could? After all, they were born there, and although they may or may not have received state subsidised education, they certainly made use of the facilities provided to them as citizens. They used the roads, the busses and so on. (Lets see, you want to go from Bombay to Delhi by bus? Your share of the petrol, wear and tear of the State Transport bus... you owe India 1 hour and 4 mins of your life. Please sign this bond.)
The brain drain that affects India and other countries is certainly a problem. The solution does not lie in making emmigration illegal, or by making people sign bonds in order to get an education. It lies in increasing the opportunity for trained people in their own countries. Those of us who have decided to emmigrate, have to live a life of compromise. On the one hand there are financial and professional rewards, and on the other there are family and cultural ties. The scales tip in different directions for different people.
However, non-resident Indians (NRIs, in Govt of India terminology), are a valuable resource. They have money (foreign exchange) to invest and a desire to see India do well. They are contributing to the Indian economy - through investments and industrial collaborations. India does and will continue to derive a benefit from the NRI population. (I am not suggesting that all professionals in India leave. I am merely pointing out that if a person does do so, then this cannot be viewed as a complete loss to India.) Also, NRI tend to do a good PR job for India.
In article <6...@cheviot.uucp> sant...@cheviot.newcastle.ac.uk (Santosh Shrivatava) writes: >the brain drain. I have no solution though. >Santosh Shrivastava
Nor do I.
But this discussion (btw, I think this is round 2 - we went over all this a long time ago) has so far focussed on the "morality" of benefitting from Indian education and using that to fatten one's (American) bank balance. With all respect, I think that this is both simplistic and futile.
Few (excepting intrepid souls like Ali :-) would argue that settling in the US after taking advantage of (scarce!) Indian resources is ethically less than admirable. But frankly, few give a damn about ethics. It has been my experience that people are essentially selfish. I merely state this as a probable fact. I don't think it's necessarily bad, but let's not get into another futile discussion!
What influence the average person are his personal concerns - depending on his priorities and tastes, the company, the culture, family, professional opportunities, and of course, money. Patriotism and ethics, you will notice, are not high on this list. They rarely even make it there (or maybe they do - those occasional twinges, you know. But perhaps their importance in rhetoric balances their absence in pragmatics.). If you want those "talented", "motivated" people, you must give their talents an outlet, and you must give them the motives they need. C'est la vie. Dammit, you expect patriotism and ethics to influence a decision that affect's one's life and career when they rarely succeed in making you pay the correct customs duty?
The answer, my friends, is not blowing in the wind; but at least, let's be honest with ourselves. And incidentally, note that I have not limited my cynicism to Indians - I think everyone is equally selfish (but of course, some are more selfish that others :~).
For the record, I enjoyed the privilege (for once, no sarcasm intended) of attending IIT Madras. If I go back, it will be due to family reasons.
One figure which I remember: The Indian government spends on average Lines: 7
20 times as much on an IITian than on an engineering graduate from other schools. The ratio for an average science or arts graduate to an IITian is larger. There is a suggestion that IITs be completely transformed to posgraduate schools. That would not solve the problem. If somebody feels strongly that he owes some money or services back to the government, he can offcourse volunteer his services to some govt. organizations.
Several years ago every other medical student found it fit to leg it to the US after completing MBBS. This came to an end as soon as the concerned organization stopped conducting the ECFMG ( I think that's the name ) exam in India . Ofcourse the tide of Indian Doctors moving to the US was also checked by the fact that very few were granted visas. This makes me believe that a practical way to check the migration of IIT graduates to this country is to ban the administration of GRE in India . Comments ?
> Several years ago every other medical student found it fit to leg it > to the US after completing MBBS. This came to an end as soon as the concerned > organization stopped conducting the ECFMG ( I think that's the name ) exam in > India . Ofcourse the tide of Indian Doctors moving to the US was also checked > by the fact that very few were granted visas. > This makes me believe that a practical way to check the migration > of IIT graduates to this country is to ban the administration of GRE in > India . > Comments ?
Some 2-3 yrs ago, there was strong rumors that GRE is also in the banning phase. But apparently they were just that, rumors. I hear that notwithstanding the ECFMG ban, some well-heeled medicos leg it to Manila/Lahore etc to take the exam. Well ? -- S. Sridhar sridhar%...@tektronix.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa
> Several years ago every other medical student found it fit to leg it > to the US after completing MBBS. This came to an end as soon as the concerned > organization stopped conducting the ECFMG ( I think that's the name ) exam in > India . Ofcourse the tide of Indian Doctors moving to the US was also checked > by the fact that very few were granted visas. > This makes me believe that a practical way to check the migration > of IIT graduates to this country is to ban the administration of GRE in > India . > Comments ?
My summary of this discussion is that, We are (those here from india) all brainy guys! We are smart (we have already come to greener pastures). We are patriotic (we want other brainy guys to stay back to serve the country - our mother land?) -------------- It should be noted that many people from IIT/IISc who go join industries move to US after a few years. (This is atleast true from my batch of students. I came here after working for 5 years in indian industry. I know several others who came between 1 and 5 years after leaving IISc) Money is certainly one of the reason; But many people have left India for other reasons(I don't want to go into all the different reasons). --------------- The budget of IISc was about $2 million per year (2 crore rupees). The money repatriated from indians abroad is about $1 billion (approximate) - precious Foreign Exchange to buy high tech machinery etc, badly needed by indian industry. ---- If an indian spends $20,000 in India (earned outside India), probably he is paying back the money govt spent educating him. --------------- I recall one of the participant in a debate (in IISc) said "The problem is not of brain drain but of DRAINED BRAINS" (She was an arts student; the topic of debate was some thing like "The problem of scientific brain drain"). ---------------- Many of the technological advances of the west do reach poorer countries like India; One may look at the brain drain as the contribution of the poorer countries to the global technological advancement (benifiting the whole of mankind). the BEST brains should be at the BEST places for advancing science and technology. (I am not saying which is the BEST place!) -------------- ======================================= Most of the above are facts/my observations
The solutions should be aimed at the root cause of the problem. If GRE is banned, people may find it difficult to go to USA. But, how about universities in countries like Canada, UK, Australia, ... which do not require GRE. (I have heard of many people going to Singapore etc to write ECFMG) --------------------------- Ramakrishna M.V., Univ. of Waterloo, Ont, Canada. ---------------------------
In article <7...@duke.UUCP>, a...@duke.UUCP (Jitendra Apte) writes:
> Several years ago every other medical student found it fit to leg it > to the US after completing MBBS. This came to an end as soon as the concerned > organization stopped conducting the ECFMG ( I think that's the name ) exam in > India . Ofcourse the tide of Indian Doctors moving to the US was also checked > by the fact that very few were granted visas. > This makes me believe that a practical way to check the migration > of IIT graduates to this country is to ban the administration of GRE in > India . > Comments ?
The American Medical Association appears to be the main force both behind the restrictions on where the ECFMG is administered, as well as the fact that visas are hard to come by if you are a medico. (While the justification of course, is that foreign medical graduates are not quite up to par with American medical graduates, it seems obvious that there is an ulterior economic motive.) The AMA appears to be a lobby powerful enough to get whatever it wants: In his book, Jimmy Carter calls the AMA just about the most powerful lobby he had to deal with. It has certainly done better than any other labour union in the country in obtaining quotas on foreign imports.
I have a feeling that similar results will be hard to acheive in the case of engineers and scientists unless there is a force comparable to the AMA that lobbies against letting them come into this country.
Certainly, the Indian government could take the initiative in banning the administration of the GRE in India. This would however require a system similar to the "exit visa" system prevalent in some countries to ensure that students can come here when appropriate. I really do not think that would be a desirable system for us to adopt in India. Besides, banning the GRE effectively may require the co-operation of the neigbouring countries at the very least.
I am also not so sure that the Indian government would have succeeded very well on its own in preventing medicos from coming here. I wonder if others on the net feel the same way.
