Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Possible physics bug in RotJ.
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
poskanzer.pa  
View profile  
 More options Jun 5 1983, 9:45 pm
Newsgroups: net.movies.sw
From: Poskanzer...@PARC-MAXC.ARPA@sri-unix.UUCP
Date: Sun, 5-Jun-83 21:45:57 EDT
Local: Sun, Jun 5 1983 9:45 pm
Subject: Possible physics bug in RotJ.
In the rebels' holographic simulation (a beautiful effect), the Death
Star is shown in a geostationary (well, endorstationary) orbit.  It is
also shown as being only a few Death-Star-radii from the surface, and
certainly less than one Endor-radius.

There is a contradiction here.  For the stationary orbit to be that
close, either the planet spins in only a few hours, or it has very light
gravity.  The scenes on Endor's surface showed no evidence of either of
the above.

Possible fixes: even when only partially operational, the Death Star
could levitate; or maybe the shield generating station also provided
levitation until the Death Star's engines came on line.  Or maybe the
planet did have very light gravity, but there was a humongous mascon
right under the shield station, providing "normal" gravity in the
immediate area.  Except that you would expect a lake to collect...
---
Jef


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Phil Karn  
View profile  
 More options Jun 6 1983, 4:45 pm
Newsgroups: net.movies.sw
From: k...@eagle.UUCP (Phil Karn)
Date: Mon, 6-Jun-83 16:45:36 EDT
Local: Mon, Jun 6 1983 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: Possible physics bug in RotJ.
a
Gee, I'm ashamed that I didn't catch that one too.  On the other hand,

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Phil Karn  
View profile  
 More options Jun 6 1983, 4:47 pm
Newsgroups: net.movies.sw
From: k...@eagle.UUCP (Phil Karn)
Date: Mon, 6-Jun-83 16:47:19 EDT
Local: Mon, Jun 6 1983 4:47 pm
Subject: Re: Possible physics bug in RotJ.
Gee, I'm ashamed that I didn't catch that one too.  The Death Star
was obviously Endor-stationary because it had to sit within the
stationary beam of the force field station.  I suspect that it
was "levitated" by the force field; that means that they didn't have
to blow it up, it would just have crashed on the planet surface
when the force field was destroyed!

Phil


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Phil Karn  
View profile  
 More options Jun 6 1983, 11:47 pm
Newsgroups: net.movies.sw
From: k...@eagle.UUCP (Phil Karn)
Date: Mon, 6-Jun-83 23:47:55 EDT
Local: Mon, Jun 6 1983 11:47 pm
Subject: Re: Possible physics bug in RotJ.
Come to think of it, I have a (weak) piece of evidence for my earlier
assertion that the Death Star was not in stationary orbit but was rather
being held up by the force field: the existence of gravity on the station!
(Of course, I know of no Star Wars sequences featuring zero gravity, so...)

Phil


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
caf  
View profile  
 More options Jun 7 1983, 2:34 pm
Newsgroups: net.movies.sw
From: c...@cdi.UUCP
Date: Tue, 7-Jun-83 14:34:16 EDT
Local: Tues, Jun 7 1983 2:34 pm
Subject: Re: Possible physics bug in RotJ.
I had the impression (from the Alliance Simulation) that it was in
geosynchronus orbit about that moon.  Of course one might question
whether such a small body would be able to hold an atmosphere long
enough to evolve Ewoks.

The physics guffaws that gave me the jollies were the fireballs in
vacuum.  Oh well, I've learned to accept sound in vacuum ...
--

        Chuck Forsberg, Chief Engr, Computer Development Inc.
        6700 S. W. 105th, Beaverton OR 97005   (503) 646-1599
        cdi!caf


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google