Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Following Distance (NOT SERIOUS!)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Chris Edmonds  
View profile  
 More options Mar 28 1986, 1:58 pm
Newsgroups: net.auto
From: chr...@ihlpl.UUCP (Chris Edmonds)
Date: Fri, 28-Mar-86 13:58:16 EST
Local: Fri, Mar 28 1986 1:58 pm
Subject: Following Distance (NOT SERIOUS!)
All this discussion about following distance has produced no new
information.   The same old 2 second or 1 car length issues are
aired repetitively and agonizingly.  We all agree, its a great idea
but it can't be enforced because everyone won't obey the rules.

NOW FOR SOMETHING DIFFERENT:-) It seems to me that there is another answer
to this issue which everyone seems to have missed (remember your math...
there are always two solutions to a problem...the "real" one and the
"imaginary" one.)  [BTW...I though of waiting until 4/1 to post this...]

The other solution is to make your following distance zero.  That's
right!  Not 5 inches, 5 feet, or 5 car lengths...but ZERO!   If your
following distance is zero there can be no collision, your reaction
time is irrelevant, and you don't even have to have functional brakes.
In a conventional chain reaction collision everyone potentially suffers
the same damage ....well in this scenario each vehicle tailgating at
zero distance absorbs some of the shock of the collision.  As you go
back in the chain each vehicle would receive progressively less damage.
(The insurance companies should love it.)  Of course the guy in front
suffers the affects of the cumulative inertia of ALL vehicles in the
chain.  (I have always been told it was cheaper to kill someone than
put them in the hospital for an extended period.)

Of course there are a few problems.  No one will want to be in front of a
pack. [Pet peeve #395;  the guy who just has to be in front...he can't
be behind a motorcycle doing 75mph...he's just gotta pass].   [Pet peeve
#722, the slow poke in the fast lane...56mph....he won't survive the
first accident.]  It will make TV commercials more realistic [Pet peeve
#201, the Honda, M/B, et al. commercials shot with a long lens showing
race car driving under highway conditions at 12 inch following distance.]

Chris Edmonds @ AT&T Something-or-Other, Naperville, IL ...!ihnp4!ihlpl!chrise
  .....This in no way reflects the opinions of myself or my employer.....
       [Don't bother to send flames...I don't like the idea either!]


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »