Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Neoperspectives
Home
+ new post
Pages
Files
About this group
Join this group
Welfare history results and reform
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Nick Cirillo  
View profile  
 More options Dec 9 2007, 8:37 pm
From: Nick Cirillo <nvc1...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 9 2007 8:37 pm
Subject: Welfare history results and reform
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

In studying The Welfare Reform system for a project for school, I must say that your article was very helpful at first, showing many observations backed up with fact. However, I am very confused about something: On this article "Welfare; History, Results, and Reform" from 2004, I couldn't understand your 10 conclusions. You say that Welfare does "not bring people out of poverty" even though you say that "Welfare Reform is a success". You also say that it is "responsible for out-of-wedlock pregnancies" even though your graphs "have sigificant drops around the time Welfare Reform kicks in". After Welfare Reform, your graphs show an increase in employment and decrease in welfare use and poverty, and yet you say it perpetuates poverty. I am just confused... What did I miss?

  I would like to remain anonymous and my comment not to be used or quoted on your website. I hope I can get a reply to my question, although I do not know if 'neoperspectives' is still monitored and, if so, by whom.

  Thank You.

---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google