                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mox...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.46;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0BB6E49B-7C24-466F-BF38-E33036233...@neotechnology.com>
References: <CAONgFZ4xFzZ3u5cUW_E0AofEzbSbbueUNC2b6phuk1vPKkc...@mail.gmail.com>
	<0BB6E49B-7C24-466F-BF38-E33036233...@neotechnology.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:57:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAONgFZ4N7MDO+H-Os7dPXUCr2cb2gerM+e5_Soob-bV=yh_...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] accessing a neo4j storage from two JVMs
From: Matteo Moci <mox...@gmail.com>
To: neo4j@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

yes, that could work:
in this case it would offer web services to interact with the graph, right?

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Michael Hunger
<michael.hun...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
> Why not have just one JVM that owns the db (like the neo4j server) and
> offers a remote domain-level API ?
>
> Michael
>
> Am 05.10.2012 um 11:34 schrieb Matteo Moci:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>> I'd like to know if a behaviour like the following can be supported by neo4j.
>>
>> I have a neo4j graph, used in embedded mode,
>> that is accessed by two processes in two different JVMs.
>>
>> The first one is a webapp that opens the graph and is able to search
>> in the graph's indices
>> (e.g. full text, exact, etc... ) - this can be done even in a read_only mode;
>> the second one is a batch process that once a day cleans the database
>> (clean indexes, remove all vertices and edges)
>> and writes the latest snapshot of data that should be available for
>> searching to the other JVM.
>>
>> The thing that bothers me is that the graph is loaded two times from
>> the directory (one per JVM),
>> and I don't know if the read_only supports other JVM to load it and
>> modify its contents.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Matteo
>>
>> --
>> Matteo Moci
>> http://it.linkedin.com/in/matteomoci
>> http://about.me/matteomoci/bio
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>



-- 
Matteo Moci
http://it.linkedin.com/in/matteomoci
http://about.me/matteomoci/bio