Received: by 10.236.178.3 with SMTP id e3mr35258109yhm.3.1341410376178;
        Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: neo4j@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.93.48 with SMTP id k36ls15300010yhf.6.gmail; Wed, 04 Jul
 2012 06:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.73.131 with SMTP id v3mr35244028yhd.6.1341410375052;
        Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.73.131 with SMTP id v3mr35244025yhd.6.1341410375033;
        Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <neubauer.pe...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yx0-f171.google.com (mail-yx0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e37si6007993yhi.1.2012.07.04.06.59.35
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of neubauer.pe...@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.171;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of neubauer.pe...@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=neubauer.pe...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-yx0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q11so6679296yen.2
        for <neo4j@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 06:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=3f+HvNHnlc+gvn1CnCoGOsitqmtz2aifF1EU27HjKbw=;
        b=GQDydseZ8QwfTci9SL7TprCNcaVowySeY7UFEXSSXyjhwok0yFkZqdNNnsAAIFyEIp
         1yzwODN5mdMr3OCzPvQaIFAbyIENmS5fCe8NqWPriWkbQ5Tdp8zY9jkdg7tlgLvUiZhG
         i+s7ITN/Hi/lWXFfMfDtz6npKP0owJRdc2pucB37Dgc3Mvgoh8N/7ebkCvtbRbMjq9Ea
         6tQJ+mQUjbEb8OXfisKV14NSXJ2O0fbf19t58DjO9xVe2TEYvqHmuX11KcihDwCImPKB
         wDq2qGmxdmUWD5iXp1tAKPBq1yJW8hjc94wb9fiRJVn4BpFHaFP/WRVkNy/MXY1c9ymp
         ufrw==
Received: by 10.50.213.1 with SMTP id no1mr13361695igc.71.1341410374723; Wed,
 04 Jul 2012 06:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: neubauer.pe...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.209.141 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 06:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8fd1da66-c1f3-4ea7-b9f3-20f0c868fa95@googlegroups.com>
References: <8fd1da66-c1f3-4ea7-b9f3-20f0c868fa95@googlegroups.com>
From: Peter Neubauer <peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 15:59:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF59RW5UbnP4xgF5o=i17_zn8EQGehOmv-Kj-0QNP1FakTk...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j spatial search
To: neo4j@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Ben,
got more details on your setup, the dataset and maybe some live
instance to look?

Cheers,

/peter neubauer

G:  neubauer.peter
S:  peter.neubauer
P:  +46 704 106975
L:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
T:   @peterneubauer

If you can write, you can code - @coderdojomalmo
If you can sketch, you can use a graph database - @neo4j


On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Ben <dbenjamin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a neo4j db with a spatial layer, it is taking too long to search and
> return results (abt 40 mins). Is there any way of improving its performance?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben