Message from discussion
Will JS plugin arrive in 1.7
Received: by 10.50.158.229 with SMTP id wx5mr8082017igb.0.1332316133975;
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: neo4j@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.108.71 with SMTP id e7ls1026234ibp.0.gmail; Wed, 21 Mar
2012 00:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.159.9 with SMTP id j9mr1521927icx.6.1332316132980;
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.159.9 with SMTP id j9mr1521925icx.6.1332316132966;
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <neubauer.pe...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-iy0-f179.google.com (mail-iy0-f179.google.com [209.85.210.179])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eo1si269525igc.0.2012.03.21.00.48.52
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of neubauer.pe...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.179;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of neubauer.pe...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=neubauer.pe...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by iakh37 with SMTP id h37so1618457iak.24
for <neo4j@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Xz74hIorfPOWF1bUdUhk+HeJTmTSqScFf8p+YC2HMOs=;
b=s/2WdJjlUk39FiAuZh3BXQUCm59TqSRh125Urcx13aFsh8Krm3cPP5MVuBwCr6HW4g
h6MH58FNYMbzWST6mID7AZmvWSI10Z1NntBQmK1+H2ww/a0TDZoVwOdtXs//7E0LQx9h
61OWmYAIF6IdnUXfln7sZ+DnJ+uaMcvZ/yaBMMcnrC7v3OT6B/zhZpvR/oQ4dMtcmD9D
sb0Vfbet+oux8XWFbQs/sl3H+z5HJXKFA++dRyPOy1RuORoPTB/OBDQS8n2mpQpSLVRb
wN04iZaRR2UzDdtjoUPBB+HiDTGCwS9mRdOHVjXCfEV60C5/r54rb4vhJCub1W8XmOqw
/hug==
Received: by 10.50.171.67 with SMTP id as3mr1981914igc.61.1332316132756; Wed,
21 Mar 2012 00:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: neubauer.pe...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.46.7 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2407785.563.1332278875678.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbiz13>
References: <10037041.3690.1332079442289.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbut24>
<CAF59RW7CUzMw24SNSgsnvrVjrV4Xoyit8SKAC5nqNmGsiuk...@mail.gmail.com>
<11A565DB-8A65-4028-8D96-B550D8673...@gmail.com> <CAF59RW5_QHH4r3wRY9JJefVa_wu=vHJ+LR3xfG=WqpwGo=o...@mail.gmail.com>
<CAF59RW5QoC-nhKuO1yO5T15DGyTWBX3a9aCd6KmahTCN3oE...@mail.gmail.com> <2407785.563.1332278875678.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbiz13>
From: Peter Neubauer <peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:48:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF59RW4Nkczq-OqbaRJSbbAoGyNpdr7+_xM3ku4i8A0V2qZ...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Will JS plugin arrive in 1.7
To: neo4j@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Great Rick - do you know the best maven packaging of Rhino in order to
pull in a later version than the one packaged with the JRE?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
G: =A0neubauer.peter
S: =A0peter.neubauer
P: =A0+46 704 106975
L:=A0 =A0http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
T: =A0 @peterneubauer
Neo4j 1.6 released =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 - dzone.com/6S4K
The Neo4j Heroku Challenge =A0 - http://neo4j-challenge.herokuapp.com/
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Rick Bullotta <rbullo...@gmail.com> wrote=
:
> Peter et al : We have a lot of experience with Rhino, particularly in are=
as
> like this (dealing with the Java <-> JS boundary).=A0 Rhino is embedded i=
n our
> ThingWorx product.
> On Monday, March 19, 2012 9:22:07 AM UTC-4, Peter Neubauer wrote:
>>
>> Also,
>> note that the plugin IS working now, there are two issues that you or
>> James could look at, seem the ignored tests in JSPluginTest.
>>
>> Basically, [1,2,3] gives back a rhino.NativeArray that is not in the
>> inheritance hierarchy of java.util.Array at all, some thing from
>> {"test":"test"} giving back a NativeObject instead of a java.utl.Map
>> instance ...
>>
>> /peter
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Peter Neubauer
>> <neubauer.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Well,
>> > James and I have been sketching on a Javascript plugin for the neo4j
>> > server,
>> > see
>> > https://github.com/neo4j/javascript-plugin
>> >
>> > There are some tests missing, but we are discussing if Javascript is a
>> > better base for hosted environments...
>> >
>> > On Mar 18, 2012 6:27 PM, "Marko Rodriguez" <okramma...@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Gremlin-JavaScript hasn't been built yet. If someone wants to provide=
a
>> >> pull request, I'd be more than happy to give it a strong eye and merg=
e
>> >> it
>> >> into Gremlin if its good.
>> >>
>> >> Marko.
>> >>
>> >> http://markorodriguez.com
>> >>
>> >> On Mar 18, 2012, at 8:26 AM, Peter Neubauer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> James, Marko,
>> >> How stable is Gremlin Javascript? The problem is that there is a larg=
e
>> >> perception that Gremlin IS pipes + groovy.. Deployment of different
>> >> variations Imho might create confusion and docs duplication if it is
>> >> not
>> >> fully mainstream?
>> >>
>> >> On Mar 18, 2012 3:04 PM, "Johnny Weng Luu" <johnny.weng....@gmail.com=
>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Congrats for the release of 1.7.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm curious about if the JS plugin will be there in one of the 1.7
>> >>> milestones.
>> >>>
>> >>> Johnny
>> >>
>> >>
>> >