Received: by 10.180.98.199 with SMTP id ek7mr609639wib.0.1340407190209;
        Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: neo4j@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.77.45 with SMTP id p13ls236415wiw.1.gmail; Fri, 22 Jun
 2012 16:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.106.3 with SMTP id gq3mr569155wib.1.1340407186887;
        Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.106.3 with SMTP id gq3mr569154wib.1.1340407186877;
        Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <a...@morgner.de>
Received: from server0.morgner.de (server0.morgner.de. [78.46.40.216])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id bk8si215951wib.1.2012.06.22.16.19.46;
        Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of a...@morgner.de designates 78.46.40.216 as permitted sender) client-ip=78.46.40.216;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of a...@morgner.de designates 78.46.40.216 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=a...@morgner.de
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server0.morgner.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB75C3AC28
	for <neo4j@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 01:19:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at server0.morgner.de
Received: from server0.morgner.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (server0.morgner.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id y2au1DHiIIOc for <neo4j@googlegroups.com>;
	Sat, 23 Jun 2012 01:19:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (p579B4C2B.dip.t-dialin.net [87.155.76.43])
	(Authenticated sender: a...@morgner.de)
	by server0.morgner.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7178D3AC27
	for <neo4j@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 01:19:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j spatial search
References: <8fd1da66-c1f3-4ea7-b9f3-20f0c868fa95@googlegroups.com>
From: Axel Morgner <a...@morgner.de>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206)
In-Reply-To: <8fd1da66-c1f3-4ea7-b9f3-20f0c868fa95@googlegroups.com>
Message-Id: <C061637C-645E-4FEA-B68B-001349DD8...@morgner.de>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 01:19:48 +0200
To: "neo4j@googlegroups.com" <neo4j@googlegroups.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)

Hi Ben,

40 min sounds far too slow. Better should be 40 ms. :-)

Can you tell a little bit more details, f.e. how many nodes and rels do you h=
ave, how do you use Neo4j (embedded Java, REST, language binding), or anythi=
ng else what might help to figure out what goes wrong (data model, queries, u=
se cases)?

Greetings
Axel

> Hi guys,
>=20
> I have a neo4j db with a spatial layer, it is taking too long to search an=
d return results (abt 40 mins). Is there any way of improving its performanc=
e?=20
>=20
> Thanks,
> Ben