Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Neo4j
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Message from discussion Best cloud service to deploy Neo4j instances?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Andreas Kollegger  
View profile  
 More options Sep 10 2012, 4:31 pm
From: Andreas Kollegger <akolleg...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Sep 10 2012 4:31 pm
Subject: Re: Best cloud service to deploy Neo4j instances?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

The critical consideration for running a database on any cloud
infrastructure is optimizing disk I/O. As with any deployment: establish an
appropriate performance benchmark, then test different combinations of
hosts, storage and networks. Assume failure -- that everything will go up
in flames at the worst possible time -- and plan accordingly.

-Andreas

On Monday, September 10, 2012 11:45:32 AM UTC-4, versae wrote:

> Hi all,

> I am in the moment of a project [1] in which we have to abandon our
> inner and demo infrastructure and adopt a cloud-based service, what is
> a very new field to me.
> As far as I am suscribed on this list, I read that Amazon EBS is not a
> good option, because ephimeral drive is better. But at the same time,
> many users have their instances in EC2 with EBS. What about S3? On the
> other hand we have Heroku, Azure or RackSpace

> Very likely we will use the REST API to connect with our Neo4j
> instances, and there will be as many instances as users paying for
> that service, so it should be possible to launch or create new
> instances, like AMI, under request through an API with the cloud
> service.

> What do you think is better?

> [1] http://sylvadb.com/


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google