Message from discussion
Structural Abstractions in Brains and Graphs
Received: by 10.42.110.75 with SMTP id o11mr14975981icp.6.1336495497261;
Tue, 08 May 2012 09:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: neo4j@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.178.73 with SMTP id cw9ls3691871igc.4.canary; Tue, 08 May
2012 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.6.167 with SMTP id c7mr3774521iga.1.1336495495834;
Tue, 08 May 2012 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.6.167 with SMTP id c7mr3774519iga.1.1336495495819;
Tue, 08 May 2012 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <okramma...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wf3si3479423igb.3.2012.05.08.09.44.55
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 08 May 2012 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of okramma...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.180;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of okramma...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=okramma...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id up16so8190732obb.39
for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 08 May 2012 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version
:x-mailer;
bh=c8JRN/OSZaCbcFvEMdQR+BCIUwaaWk733x4LcRwYQKs=;
b=wc4z83MNstMcU8op00uaaGZkkDJ7Hk2xs/FD6DtiCFtCiN7qnZO/IZgHwiJsnMiQSL
UbfkbjuK+a1chBgwfBKLFUkPlunvKM4ashWWTfT7BSXFVtta6FSZIIOzsCZ/3WRJWMOR
yfeJGMOo2VYK1W7xlpNmKwFGuh91NUyBw1U5YnIhwdLitkaJ8j2MuOcTdhipmR3xX1ZU
1f9fG8BULfPvEVbGTm7BN5Z0vTUbd5shARtJsdedINw+xFpXRyidZQBEn4P6abHmiwM6
VAS7A1z4O3b/zdi5uhCoKYnIOeWAuxpFE+Gy+yOvlT3Z85ijAe6UQZ6UkXQpblIA/Rj2
0vcg==
Received: by 10.182.169.68 with SMTP id ac4mr28016757obc.19.1336495495219;
Tue, 08 May 2012 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <okramma...@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([67.130.216.75])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4sm22292523obn.19.2012.05.08.09.44.53
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 08 May 2012 09:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6--441478320
Subject: [Blog] Structural Abstractions in Brains and Graphs
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 10:44:50 -0600
Message-Id: <2CF792EB-E77E-47F0-ACA2-6B8C11544...@gmail.com>
Cc: neo4j@googlegroups.com
To: gremlin-users@googlegroups.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
--Apple-Mail-6--441478320
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Hi,
I recently finished a new blog post for those that are interested.
=
http://thinkaurelius.com/2012/05/08/structural-abstractions-in-brains-and-=
graphs/
The general idea is that simply seeing a graph from the perspective of =
vertices and edges is not sufficient to understand a graph -- especially =
as graphs scale to the multi-billion range. A similar realization has =
already become apparent in neuroscience and I believe that much can be =
borrowed from neuroscience when studying and designing graph systems. I =
make some analogies between brains and graphs that hopefully better =
articulate this thesis.
Enjoy!,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
--Apple-Mail-6--441478320
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=us-ascii
<html><head></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; =
">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I recently finished a new blog post for those =
that are interested.</div><div><br></div><div><span =
class=3D"Apple-tab-span" style=3D"white-space:pre"> </span><a =
href=3D"http://thinkaurelius.com/2012/05/08/structural-abstractions-in-bra=
ins-and-graphs/">http://thinkaurelius.com/2012/05/08/structural-abstractio=
ns-in-brains-and-graphs/</a></div><div><br></div><div>The general idea =
is that simply seeing a graph from the perspective of vertices and edges =
is not sufficient to understand a graph -- especially as graphs scale to =
the multi-billion range. A similar realization has already become =
apparent in neuroscience and I believe that much can be borrowed from =
neuroscience when studying and designing graph systems. I make some =
analogies between brains and graphs that hopefully better articulate =
this =
thesis.</div><div><br></div><div>Enjoy!,</div><div>Marko.</div><div><br><d=
iv>
<a href=3D"http://markorodriguez.com">http://markorodriguez.com</a>
</div>
<br></div></body></html>=
--Apple-Mail-6--441478320--