There are a few things that may affect this. Are the messages
asynchronous or synchronous? Are there reliable messaging mechanisms
built into the exchange? For example,
A-[sends_message]->B get through
A-[sends_message]->B but it gets lost in cyberspace.
B-[sends_message]->A and it gets through // replying to message one
A-[sends_message]->B which is a resend of the first message because if
never received an ack.
More to this than meets the eye sometimes.
I worked within OASIS on WS-RX. YOu might want to read up on this:
THere are some scenarios modelled there that may be of interest.
Consulting and Contracting; Proven Results!
i. Neo4J, Java, LiveCycle ES, Flex, AIR, CQ5 & Mobile
"Don't fear the Graph! Embrace Neo4J"
From: Chris Albertson <albertson.ch...@gmail.com<mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com>" <firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com>>
Date: Tuesday, 29 May, 2012 6:02 PM
To: "firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com>" <firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com>>
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Need suggestion on data model
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Michael Hunger <michael.hun...@neotechnology.com<mailto:michael.hun...@neotechnology.com>> wrote:
> If user B replied to A is message. New message object will be
> created. how to maintain sequence between those messages
Look at the email headers. You will find that most of them already have a line that starts "In-Reply-To:" and then has a message ID.
What you really should do is use this existing email headers. The chain of "in-reply-to" pointers will do what you want
Likewise if filing measles there are other headers, like sender to "to" that would make idea links
Redondo Beach, California