was Ayn Rand's philosophy really for super jewish power and wealth?

[CJF of America]

consider jewsters and their clever ways. jewsters have always been a
minority except in israel. so, it's always been necessary for
jewsters to have goyim act on jewish interests. how can jewsters do
it alone when surrounded by a population that is 95-99% goyim?
so, if jewsters push This or That ideology or agenda that brazenly and
openly says it's for jewish interests, goyim get pissed and tell
jewsters to 'kiss my dimwit goy ass'.
so, jewsters must make it seem as though it is the interest and
benefit to the goyim to embrace and support agendas pushed by
jewsters.

consider superman comics. superman was An All-American Hero who
fought 'enemies of America'... or so we thought. It turns out that he
fought enemies of Jewsters. But, since he looked and acted All-
American, we thought superman's values and agendas must be that of
goyim in general and at large. If the creators of Superman--jewster
comic artists--had created Superman in their image, he would have been
seen as Jewish superhero fighting for Jewish interests. Suppose
Superman looked like Alan Dershawitz or Howard Stern. No one would
have mistook Superman for All-American, meaning All-Goy. And,
Superman's causes would have been seen as distinctly Jewishy.
But, Superman looked like the All-American ideal. He looked like Rock
Hudson or young Ronald Reagan or Gary Cooper. So, when Superman
fought Nazis and other enemies of Jewsters, we thought he was fighting
for 'all of us'.

Now, is Randism simply an higher form of Superman-ism to dupe the
dimwit goyim?
notice that the greatest acolytes of Randism are dimwit goyim. sure,
there are jewsters who love Rand but for good reason. Randism serves
jewsters well. But, does it serve dimwit goyim well? Only if the
goy happens to be very intelligent, which is usually not the case. If
25% of jews are exceptionally intelligent, only 2-3% of goyim are
such. So, if randism is an ideology that favors the highly
intelligent, it mostly favors jews, not goyim.
indeed, what is the quality that is most crucial in making tons of
money, gaining great powers, having great influence, etc? of course,
intelligence is not the only factor but it is a crucial factor. and
most goyim are not that smart; jews in general are much smarter.
suppose a goy version of jerry springer tried to invite jewish trash
on the show to make fools of themselves. how many jews would show up
on the show? besides, is there even a jewish trash underclass? how
many trailer trash jews? if jews did appear on the program, it would
be professors and lawyers bickering about contracts, not big fat dumb
jews wrestling, kicking and punching, and flashing their ding dongs.
of course, there are jews who play at being trashy but they are doing
the 'exploiting' instead of being exploited. adam sandler plays the
dumb slob, and howard stern put on the king-of-white-trash act. but,
it's purely schtick with both, and they've raked in 100s of millions
of dollars. how much money do goy guests on jerry springer make?
masses of goyim are trash. smart jews will sometimes play trashy in
order to rake in gazillions from all the goy dimwits out there.

though randism is seen as the ideological opposite of marxism, they
both have one thing in common. they lead to jewish domination under
the veneer of universal-justice or freedom-for-all. communism was
supposed to be about saving all humanity but it favored the radical
intellectual class, and in all european communist nations leftwing
jews were the first to consolidate power; eventually, jews were so
outnumbered that jews lost power. but, the appeal of communism to a
lot of jews was that it favored intellectual jews while fooling the
masses of goyim that it was equally good for all. under communism
government is all-powerful, and those with best education had access
to government positions.
under libertarianism, those with best smarts rise and rise to the
toppermost of poppermost. and, who are favored by this system?
jewsters. so, randism and marxism have one thing in common: they dupe
goyim with seemingly univeralist or color-blind creeds which, upon
closer inspection, are designed to favor the jews.

-----

before we go on, let's first define libertarianism. if anarchism is
leftist-anti-governmentism, libertarianism is rightist anti-
governmentism. the anarchist hero is the little guy and its ideal is
equality. the libertarian hero is the Great Man and its ideal is a
meritocratic hierarchical society led by super tycoons and visionary
god-like artists and scientists. randism is the most extreme form of
libertarianism.

now, under randism who wins the most and has most to gain? the
smartest, most ruthless, most brilliant, most cunning, most sly, and
most slippery. THE JEWSTERS.
so, randism opens the gate to Jewish dominance since jews will surely
be the mightiest businessmen, scientists, artists, lawyers, and the
like.

but, selling jewish dominance is not easy to the goy masses. so, in
rand's stories the most successful types are studly goy hunk gentile
types. dimwit goyim reading rand think the freemarket will lead to
their dominance when, in fact, the jews are favored in the competition
thanks to their higher IQ dna.
but, that is the only way to make libertarianism palatable to the goy
masses--make the goyim believe that people who look like gary cooper
will win in the randian universe(funnier is the notion that your
average goy looks like gary cooper in the first place. an average goy
looks like Stuttering John). you see how silly this all is. cooper,
a fine actor, ate up all this crap. handsome and talented he was...
but he was no brain. indeed, the ludicrousness of randism was all too
apparent when cooper was incapable of memorizing the long self-defense
for the court scene in Fountainhead. a smart jew like milton friedman
or alan greenspan could have memorized it all. but not cooper.
now, suppose cooper's character had been named Howie Roarkowicz and
looked like your average rich jew like Mort Zuckerman or Michael
Bloomberg. if so, the goy masses would not have fallen for the
schtick. but, rand made libertarianism sexy by fooling the goy morons
that libertarianism favors the tall, studly, hunky goy types. in
reality, the richest of the rich are not tall hunksters but brainy
dorks; this is true even among goys. just LOOK at bill gates and
warren buffet. gates looks like a fat geeky frog and buffet looks
like santa's little helper in a nursing home. but, if you read rand's
books, it's guys who look like anglo-saxon or even aryan ideals who
come out on top in her universe.

so, essentially rand pushed a system that favored the brilliant sly
ruthless jew yet fooled the goyim into thinking it favored the fashion-
modelesque goyim. is fountainhead anything more than a superman comic
turned into 500 pg sham-philosophical tome?

now, most jews are not libertarian but liberals... or so they say in
public. to be sure, there are genuine anti-capitalist and counter-
capitalist jews. some are marxist-oriented and some are social-
democratic. they really do wanna see the forces of capitalism curbed
or restrained if not totally destroyed. they say they are for 'social
justice' for all humanity, but as their agenda pushes for bigger
government guided by leftist intellectual ideas it leads to jewish
dominace just the same. at the opposite of the political spectrum
among jews, there are randian and libertarian jews who say freedom and
democracy mean total economic freedom--milton friedman and greenspan
and the like. this agenda also favors the jews.

the funny irony of jewsterishness is that great many of them practice
randian libertarianism while preaching liberalism. this too is a
brilliant jewish ploy. most jews understand that though randism
appeals to the goyim, it is limited to ambitious or rich goyim. most
goyim are not all that rich or ambitious. they don't dream of
becoming tycoons or gazillionaires. they worry about paying the rent
and such. also, great many goyim are white trash, crazy negroes, and
dumb beaners. randism wouldn't appeal to those slobs. so, if jews in
general pushed randism, the majority of goyim--dumb as a doorknob--
would see it as a rich man's ideology. so, jews have to put forth an
image of themselves as friends of the poor moronic folks. so, jews say
all the liberal-wiberal things. BUT, if you watch jewish behavior,
much of it is pure randism--even among jewish liberals; they might as
well be called libertarals(or liber-terrors).
now, what is the randian ideal for individuals? it's to rise as high
as it is possible. it's not just about money but to be the very best;
roarke doesn't care about money but his greatness and vision. and, who
are most ruthlessly hungry for greatness whether in business,
literature, the arts, science, and so on? jews. so, jews wanna be
better than us. jews wanna be better than other jews. as jews are no
longer bound by a God, they wanna be little gods themselves--marx,
freud, adorno, chomsky, mailer, kael, sontag, rand, friedman, etc.
they all claim to have THE one answer that solves all problems Or they
claim to be the Greatest modern prophet there be. jews wanna go to
the best schools. if some smart liberal jew wants to go to harvard
but isn't accepted, he or she throws a fit. you see, jews say they
are FOR THE PEOPLE but don't wanna dwell among the people. their
liberalism is purely elitist. they wanna sit above us in ivory towers
or in pent-houses or a mansion on a hill and pontificate about social
justice from such height.
indeed, who are greater liberterals than hollywood jews? they are
utterly ruthless and will sell us anything to rake in gazillions of
bucks. they sure live the hollywood style--best food, best mansions,
best cars, best girls, best everything. but, as millionaires,
billionaires, and gazillionaires, they love to pontificate to us about
'social equality' and 'social justice'. this is the great brilliance
of the jew. they practice libertarianism to gain superduper power but
preach liberalism as to appear as compassionate saints. "i will make
$10 billion and live like a king for the good for the masses!!!" yep,
that is a liberteral jew for you.
just look at the google guys. they are billionaires and wanna
ruthlessly swallow up more of their competition and make billions
more. yet, they are making all these noises about 'doing no evil' and
helping mankind. now, i'm not saying capitalism is bad or google is
bad in what it is doing. indeed, one could argue that modern
corporations are good for all of us, directly or indirectly. the point
is most jews want to rise and live like randian superheroes while
preaching like marx and chomsky. this way, you can have 10 billion
and be praised as the hero of the little guy. it's the dirty jewish
secret. liberteralism.

what jews--left and right--really oppose is fascism, a paganist
ideology that favors the proud, united, and strong dimwit goyim. pure
capitalism favors the ruthless, very smart, and rich.
socialism favors the intellectuals while reducing the masses to
spineless mob dependent on gubment handouts. there is security thru
socialism but no pride.
but, fascism says the rich shouldn't forget the masses and that the
masses shouldn't just expect handouts from government. they must meet
in the middle. rich need to care for the nation as a whole. and the
masses must be willing to do stuff for their security in life.