Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
George Orwell, you were right
0 views
Skip to first unread message
NadCixelsyd
Dec 3, 2009, 5:26:17 PM12/3/09
to
Today, I get an envelope from the Brookline Police Department.
Inside it was a "warning" that on December 1st, at Washington & Beacon
streets, my car was observed with an expired inspection sticker (it
expired November 30th).
Inside it was a "warning" that on December 1st, at Washington & Beacon
streets, my car was observed with an expired inspection sticker (it
expired November 30th).
Since I was never stopped, I can only assume that it was a result of a
traffic camera at an intersection.
What's unusual was that it was only a warning. In this day-and-age of
using traffic fines to fill public coffers, I was surprised.
Jimmy
Dec 4, 2009, 12:26:30 PM12/4/09
to
On Dec 3, 5:26 pm, NadCixelsyd <nadcixel...@aol.com> wrote:
> Today, I get an envelope from the Brookline Police Department.
> Inside it was a "warning" that on December 1st, at Washington & Beacon
> streets, my car was observed with an expired inspection sticker (it
> expired November 30th).
>
> Since I was never stopped, I can only assume that it was a result of a
> traffic camera at an intersection.
> Today, I get an envelope from the Brookline Police Department.
> Inside it was a "warning" that on December 1st, at Washington & Beacon
> streets, my car was observed with an expired inspection sticker (it
> expired November 30th).
>
> Since I was never stopped, I can only assume that it was a result of a
> traffic camera at an intersection.
I've never heard of a traffic camera system that looked for expired
windshield stickers, so I really doubt that's what happened. I'd also
be surprised if a camera ticket arrived just 2 days after the
incident. Probably a cop saw your 11 sticker and wrote down your
license plate.
Jimmy
0 new messages