>>>>> "DL" == Dan Logcher <
dlogche...@comcast.net> writes:
DL> Jean B. wrote:
>> A person on another newsgroup stated that in New England, fish
>> chowder was served the next day. I have lived all but two years of
>> my life in New England and have never observed that in my sphere of
>> reference. I said I would ask here. Assuming you are in or from
>> New England, how was chowder served? Immediately after it was
>> cooked, or on a subsequent day? Thanks.
DL> Immediately. I've not noted any improvement to chowder like you'd expect
DL> from chili or lasagne by serving the next day.
hey, i'm back. lost usenet access due to dumbness on my part.
i agree. chowda is best served fresh. i have made many times (usually
broth based with no dairy) and kept leftovers with no improvement of the
flavors from the keeping. i just had some seafood chowda (in a lobster
bisque base!) i bought at the russell's farmer's market a week ago. it
was fine (sealed in tub) as is. tomato based dishes and stews are the
classic ones that seem to get better after a day or so. they have more
herbs/spices which are oil soluble (or in the acid of the tomatoes) and
so they blend more with time. chowda has few spices so nothing will
likely change with cold storage.
uri