--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "New England Randonneurs" group.
To post to this group, send email to ne-rand...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ne-randonneur...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ne-randonneurs?hl=en.
;)
In need of a facelift and re-design for sure.
The RBA is up at 3-4 AM either way ( before the start or for the finish ). When you get into the 400 and 600 riders are out when bars close anyway. I have always gone into those 1 - 4 AM starts with no sleep so at the end of the rides I am sleep deprived. The lack of sleep and the long recovery hurts my training. I would like to ride brevets again but not at this expense. For now I will continue to ride my 400k, 600k, and longer ride by myself or with a few friends who also like to start well rested.
Jake
> Yes! Start all brevets, 200 - 600k, at 7 AM instead of 1 AM or 4AM.
For this year, I'd prefer to leave the start times alone to avoid miscommunication with riders; I'd rather not have riders who preregistered well in advance showing up at 4AM and finding nobody there.
For next year, start time can be up to the ride organizer as far as I'm concerned. If this makes it easier to find ride organizers, so much the better.
I have some logistical concerns with a late start on the 600km. It would require moving the overnight control to earlier in the ride (say the 300km mark), and that won't allow as much rest because riders will have built up proportionally less time margin by that point to make up by the next control. It may also require yet another 600km route, since the route has to be designed around the overnight control location. It also means that riders finishing near the 40h mark (and the ride organizer) are more likely to need to take Monday (instead of Friday) off, since they'd be finishing at 11PM.
As RBA, I have quite a bit of concern for allowing riders adequate rest on the 600km, since it lowers the risk of a fatality.
The easiest out may be to offer an optional, later start time on the 600km next year for faster riders, with the same finishing time for all. This used to be done on the 400km, although it was before RUSA existed; I'm not sure if RUSA rules would allow it at this point.
thanks, Bruce