Message from discussion
Where is 1.5???
Received: by 10.214.215.18 with SMTP id n18mr83543qag.12.1224100820074;
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <da...@napkinstudio.com>
Received: from mail.napkinstudio.com (eggplant.cementfish.com [12.111.120.247])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22si341920yxr.1.2008.10.15.13.00.19;
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 12.111.120.247 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of da...@napkinstudio.com) client-ip=12.111.120.247;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 12.111.120.247 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of da...@napkinstudio.com) smtp.mail=da...@napkinstudio.com
Received: from eggplant.cementfish.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.napkinstudio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780B6534016;
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at napkinstudio.com
Received: from mail.napkinstudio.com ([127.0.0.1])
by eggplant.cementfish.com (eggplant.cementfish.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id SsXEi9hAaspD; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.58.222.35] (unknown [32.149.46.104])
by mail.napkinstudio.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4D70753400C;
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:00:18 +0000 (UTC)
Message-Id: <DA4A175E-5DF9-49CD-BC5F-A88FBB43D537@napkinstudio.com>
From: David Stanfill <da...@napkinstudio.com>
To: "napkin_studio@googlegroups.com" <napkin_studio@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <41c4c0cb-27ec-4c5e-abc2-ea543985d43b@l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (5F136)
Subject: Re: Where is 1.5???
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:00:12 -0400
References: <a68361e7-a7a8-4b0e-8d85-f79afc5432ae@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <41c4c0cb-27ec-4c5e-abc2-ea543985d43b@l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
We just received word that 1.5 has been approved (although it may
temporarily display as 1.02 in the App Store).
It should be available as an upgrade very soon.
On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Andrew Gould <and...@napkinstudio.com>
wrote:
>
> Watts,
>
> I'm sorry you are getting frustrated with the state of Apple's
> approval. We are in the same boat as you. We're right in the normal
> sweet spot for the Apple approval time so we anticipate an approval of
> this evening and through tomorrow before we would start to question a
> hold up. Hang in there....we're close.
>
> Andrew
> Napkin Studio
>
> On Oct 15, 12:07 pm, Watts <watt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was told it should have been approved by now... This is getting
>> ridiculous.
> >
|
