Hi Denis.
I'm using 3.2.4. I've just noticed there is a new version but I
haven't tried it yet. I'll give it a shot in a couple of days.
Meanwhile, here's the full backtrace:
=== MESSAGE:
NameError: uninitialized constant Less
=== COMPILATION STACK:
(empty)
=== BACKTRACE:
0. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/filters/less.rb:48:in `run'
1. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/result_data/item_rep.rb:335:in `filter'
2. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/item_rep_proxy.rb:47:in
`filter'
3. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/rule_context.rb:54:in
`filter'
4. ./Rules:43:in `block in load'
5. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/rule.rb:68:in `instance_eval'
6. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/rule.rb:68:in `apply_to'
7. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/compiler.rb:237:in `block (2
levels) in route_reps'
8. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/compiler.rb:235:in
`each_pair'
9. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/compiler.rb:235:in `block in
route_reps'
10. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/compiler.rb:230:in `each'
11. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/compiler.rb:230:in
`route_reps'
12. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/compiler.rb:119:in `load'
13. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/compilation/compiler.rb:82:in `run'
14. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/base/source_data/site.rb:57:in `compile'
15. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli/commands/compile.rb:61:in `run'
16. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli/command.rb:51:in `block in call'
17. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli/error_handler.rb:42:in `handle_while'
18. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli/error_handler.rb:23:in `handle_while'
19. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli/command.rb:50:in `call'
20. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli/command.rb:43:in `call'
21. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli/commands/compile.rb:24:in `block in
define'
22. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
cri-2.0.2/lib/cri/command.rb:255:in `call'
23. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
cri-2.0.2/lib/cri/command.rb:255:in `run'
24. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
cri-2.0.2/lib/cri/command.rb:272:in `run'
25. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli.rb:40:in `block in run'
26. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli/error_handler.rb:42:in `handle_while'
27. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli/error_handler.rb:23:in `handle_while'
28. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/lib/nanoc3/cli.rb:37:in `run'
29. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/
nanoc3-3.2.4/bin/nanoc3:12:in `<top (required)>'
30. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/bin/nanoc3:19:in `load'
31. /usr/local/Cellar/ruby/1.9.3-p0/bin/nanoc3:19:in `<main>'
On Feb 12, 3:15 pm, Denis Defreyne <
denis.defre...@stoneship.org>
wrote: