PURPLE HEART FALSE ACCUSATION REBUTTAL

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Dietz

unread,
Nov 6, 2007, 9:23:47 PM11/6/07
to CYBERSTALKER WEB NAMES


Doug's Purple Heart False Accusation Rebuttal:


Mr. Brooks and Brownies et al you are lying and using outrageous
fraudulent misrepresentations again. Of course I did not make any
such assertion nor asseveration of fact that I had been awarded a
Purple Heart Medal, and your lies and fraud are glaring and are being
used to deliberately harass and stalk again and to deliberately cause
me emotional distress much like your brethren smear merchants did
during the funerals of our fallen servicemen.

I must also warn you that your false representations in this regard
are leading to, inciting and creating hate directed toward me, a false
light in respect to my military service, and the deliberate infliction
of emotional distress. I hold you responsible for such events, and
your incitements and gang conspiracies are more than obvious.

In fact I have publicly stated often I do NOT have a Purple Heart
Medal, and I have submitted such statements not only to a court of
law, but also in my copyrighted materials both of which were written
long before Brooks and his Brownoses et al started to smear and
defame me over this issue.. See below for irrefutable evidence in this
regard:

I should also mention the post being repeated by the smear merchants
and con men operating on the smear gang is a "cut and paste" produced
by the CHIP person, and not from me as the headers clearly
demonstrate. More outright fraud and forgeries from the Brooks smear
gang is all I can see here - and leading the pack is the anonymous
smear and con merchants, SteveL, who is once again attempting to claim
a cut and paste from Chip is something I wrote and posted, and now he
is even blaming Giganews for hiding binaries.....amazing the fraud
these smear merchants will resort to so as to cause false light
defamation and incite others to post threats of violence and death.

Moreover, my information from the person that actually wrote the quip
in question indicates that Mr. Chip was not even talking about
"medals" at all, but was following up on a previous post that dealt
with the Purple Heart "Cards" that were then being provided by the VA
to individuals with any type of service connected disability.

As further evidence of the Brooks gang's fraud in this respect
consider the following Google archives: (Note I have copies of all
posts referenced herein, if anyone would like for me to post them
please advise).

Feb 10, 2004 (long before the Nigel Brooks smear campaign which
started in March 2005).
"If I or any of my men in Vietnam claimed a purple heart for every
"scratch" we received in the Jungle or on patrol, or during an enemy
attack back at base camp, we all would have received dozens of "Purple
Hearts" I certainly do not have a purple heart and I am not claiming
I have one.
There are at least a dozen more posts in which I clearly state that I
do not have a Purple Heart medal, and that I never said I did, and
here are a few of them:
http://tinyurl.com/yy37ss I clearly state in plain English that I do
not have a Purple Heart Medal and never said I did.

http://tinyurl.com/thqxs (In this post members of the Brooks smear
gang even admit they know I never said I had the Purple Heart Medal
and just that I should have had one due to my claims of injuries).
http://tinyurl.com/gxnnw
"Doug Says: First, you do not have all of my records to review, you
are lying when you claim you can complete a "thorough review" of them-
that is just a bald face lie. Second, I did not whine for a purple
heart each time I received a scratch in Vietnam or in Korea - and you
are right about one thing, I never received a Purple Heart simply
because I never asked for one - and I left Vietnam on Emergency leave
and my records did not follow me - or I think I might have asked for
one before I was discharged."

Here is a statement below by this very toady MAC that clearly admits
I did not have a Purple Heart Medal, never said I did, but "should
have one" according to his Brownie logic. (Yet above this same
Brownie contradicts his own previous post that I do not have a PH
medal, with a new lie claiming that I previously asseverated to have
a Purple Heart Medal - amazing! So is the toady lying now, or was he
lying before? Pick one - you probably would be right regardless of
your selection.)

MAC said:
"You should have a Purple Heart." http://tinyurl.com/ybfklw Jan 25,
2006

"Doug Says: Really? I did not know you had the authority to issue
those medals? Please provide the nature of my injury and tell us why
it qualifies for the Purple Heart medal, and while you are at it,
please provide the forms my commander sent in requesting that
medal. .It seems the Board of Corrections could not find them. If my
commander did not believe I was entitled to the Purple
Heart, then I was not entitled to it. Period. End of Story. I did not
make claims for a "purple heart" for every injury and minor scratch I
received in Vietnam, like Hanoi John Kerry did. "

http://tinyurl.com/holfh
1. Red Jacket said:
"Shit boy at least Brooks has a Victoria Cross ! I hear you > ain't
got even > a Purple Heart. >"
"Doug Says: Brooks said he had three Victoria Crosses - AND that he
received Vietnam campaign medals even *after* he was discharged from
the US Army, and you are right, I do not have a Purple Heart Medal.
You should really read what else BS Brooks is lying about."

http://tinyurl.com/kb8qj (Sept 23, 2005).

Here is irrefutable evidence that Brownie Dai Uy, and gang leader
Nigel Brooks, are both admitting I do not have a Purple Heart medal,
never said I did, and Nigel Brooks is even offering to help me get
one.

Brownie Dai Uy said:
"And Nigel has offered his investigatory expertise to
help you get that Purple Heart. "

1. "Doug Says: There would be no reason to call Schofield Barracks, as
it would take either my congressperson and the Board of Military
Records (Corrections) to provide me with that medal - if I want it. (I
have asked the NARA for morning reports from the Hospital I was
located in Vietnam and in Korea, - and those reports might help me if
I want to pursue this matter).
2.
3. Understand Rau, that if my CO in Vietnam or Korea did not believe I
deserved the PHM then as far as I am concerned that is the end of the
matter. I asked the Board of Corrections if he (my Vietnam Can Tho CO)
submitted a request for that medal after I left Vietnam, and they said
he did not. So either he forgot, did not care since I was already gone
(I left suddenly on emergency leave although I was close to my DEROS
and already had my assignment) or did not believe I deserved it. I
believe I do, and I believe the regulations support me. But I will
need to take the time and effort to pander for that medal, and like I
said, I do not like pandering for medals, I preferred stripes instead
of medals. " (Note that no doubt the top Brooks Brownie has every
medal imaginable - like a Russian Colonel - including awards from the
defunct RVN - hapless stone age Yard medals (two crossed finger bones
over a monkey's head) bribed out Aussie medals, (give me medals or I
will stop the steaks and Fosters' beer) and worthless ARVN medals that
tinkle and jingle when he walks because they are made out of worthless
tin and are really lost signs of a cowardly army long gone into
oblivion). Maybe like John Kerry this Brooks Brownie was allowed to
write up his own award recommendations? Who knows? I never respected
those officers that pandered for medals - and I don't know any NCO's
that did.


http://tinyurl.com/ylxrd6

Another note. If you were injured to near the point of death,
"> that implies medical evacuation and treatment. The award of
> the Purple Heart would have been practically automatic. "
1. > -- > Dave Thompson

"Doug Says: Nope. First, injured to the near point of death? Where did
you get that? I said "I was wounded in a war (and I was) AND I nearly
lost my life." I *nearly* lost my life several times in Vietnam and in
Korea, and if you were in Vietnam in any type of combat I would say
that statement would apply to you as well. Taking statements out of
context and then trying to use your own forgeries to put words into my
mouth is a typical Brooks gang tactic...you should not be so obvious
in your fraudulent attempts.
Your conclusion that all wounds/injuries are automatically provided a
purple heart is wrong. There must be a paper process first. (Note
also the poster "Bear" (a.k.a. Alfred Snyder) also said he was wounded
but also did not receive the Purple Heart Medal).
http://tinyurl.com/w2kgu Here is the post from Mr. Snyder (Bear) that
states that he and many others were wounded but also did not receive
any Purple Heart medal. I am sure that Mr. Snyder (Bear) can prove
his wounds as well as I can, and I am sure he can certainly name all
those other members of his platoon that were also wounded but did not
receive their purple heart medals as well. (If not him then his CO
Cpt. Bergston can, or his later CO, Cpt. Ayres certainly can.)


BTW, here is a report by one of Brooks former Brownies....strange that
Brooks did not challenge this guy???
Big Bear" <bigbear1. ...@nativeweb.net> wrote in message
news:qNOdnaVziYJ...@comcast.com...


> No Purple Hear. It was merely a scratch from shrapnel. Nothing
> to write home
> about. Many others in my platoon received the same kind of
> wounds w/o
> receiving Purple Hearts.

1. Doug Says: Wow! There are others here that say that claim is a
complete and total lie! MAC and Red Jacket said that was
impossible! They said that everytime you received a wound
(scratch or not) it was "automatic" that you also received a
purple heart medal! Are you calling all these guys liars? And
now you are saying "others" in your platoon also received wounds
but did not receive their Purple Heart medals also??? Wow!

2. According to the Brooks Brownies that claim is well, "impossible"
but then they all also claim Mr. Bear was truthful????? I guess it
depends on whether the person making a statement will kiss Brooks ass
or not in respect to whether he is called a liar or not....I wonder if
the world "hypocrite" means anything to Brooks or his Brownies,
especially Shavetail Brownies?

3. See the following URL for more proof of the Brooks false
accusations and forgeries:
4.
http://tinyurl.com/yns8p4


(Update to the above: I am now being told the Army is not sure that
my records ever left Vietnam. Moreover, the Army recently told me
that my CO could have recommended me for more decorations, but since I
had already left the unit on emergency leave close to my DEROS date I
was thereby immediately reassigned and I was off the books of my old
Vietnam unit. Since I was legally already assigned to a new unit the
minute I left Vietnam, all my Vietnam CO could have done was place his
recommendations in my records for final processing at my next unit of
assignment. However, my records never arrived at my next unit. In
fact, according to the Army, they never arrived back in the USA.

Since my CO in Can Tho had pulled all kinds of strings to get me
promoted to SFC E-7 with all maximum waivers and such, and he knew I
went to the hospital in Vietnam, my Can Tho duty Colonel probably
also recommended me for other decorations but I will never know as my
records have been missing for about 40 years. After I left Vietnam,
at first , the Vietnam personnel office held up my records due to a
DEROS date error (made by them) and when that error was resolved in my
favor they were supposed to send my records to my new duty station in
the States. Nevertheless, my records never arrived before my
discharge date some ten months later, and since that date I have
written many letters trying to find them over the years. The last I
was told was my records were destroyed in a fire somewhere in
Vietnam. Congressman Andrews was able to secure some copies of my
medical records from the various medical facilities that I attended,
and of course the Pentagon had some copies of some orders and such,
but so far that is about it).

As of this date I am waiting for Morning Report records from the
hospital I was admitted to in Vietnam. My other previous injury due
to an Artillery/Rocket/Mortar/Sonic Boom (no one really knew which)
explosion is well documented in the medical records Congressman
Andrews found for me in 1993). Also note it is up to the Army to
determine if I am eligible for the Purple Heart Medal and not me or my
Congressman. Sometimes the Army Board of Corrections considers the
evidence submitted for a medal is sufficient, sometimes not. So
although *I* believe I am eligible, and so the Brooksmearease gang
does not deliberately misinterpret what I am saying here, I am NOT
claiming any official eligibility, desirability, deservedness, merited
nor earned for any decoration including but not limited to the Purple
Heart Medal. That will be up to the US Army Board of Corrections to
decide not me.)

http://tinyurl.com/yarjnk Here is yet another clear statement I do
not have a Purple Heart Medal.

B. "Hospitals and Doctor offices must be mandated to contact the local
foreign workers' registration office to determine legal status prior
to administering any health care, same for schools, welfare, etc. All
Government services must be required to first verify legal status
prior to administering any Government services. I am an American
Veteran, and when I arrive at the VA
I am forced to show my Purple Heart card ID before they will even talk
to me (note before the cyberstalkers start to wail and howl about what
I just said be assured that I am not saying possession of a Purple
Heart card indicates that I have a "Purple Heart Medal" I do not have
that medal - and that is just the old slang for the card as it used to
contain the image of a purple V -the
newer ones have an American flag background on them). Nevertheless, if
as an American Veteran I must show proper identification prior to
receiving VA services, why not foreign
workers and their families as well? Are illegals above showing their
entitlement identification but American Veterans are not?

Where is the justice in that? If we can force tens of millions of vets
to register and receive their proper ID's, we certainly can also do it
for about twelve million illegal aliens."
1.


Dai Uy said: http://tinyurl.com/yhwpxp (May 9, 2006).

> "Did you query Mr. Tillman about your Purple Heart(s)?"

1. "Doug Says: First, I have never claimed to have any "Purple Hearts"
- in fact I have stated the opposite several times. So that is just
another incredible attempt to lie and defame for the purpose of
cyberstalking."

2. Doug's Note: This above false accusation by Dai Uy is especially
interesting as he has proved himself and Nigel Brooks liars with his
own post. If you read his statements http://tinyurl.com/kb8qj (Sept
23, 2005). He says that Nigel Brooks has offered to help me obtain a
Purple Heart medal.

3. Considering that he nor Nigel would have ever made that offer if
they really believed I had already said I had a Purple Heart Medal.
Yet for both of them to come back a year later and then suddenly claim
that I had been saying I already had the Purple Heart Medal all along
is an obvious, and incontrovertible admission they are lying, they
know they are lying, and they are lying for the purpose of defamation
and harassment.

http://tinyurl.com/y4l523 This is Nigel Brooks offer to "help me"
qualify for a Purple Heart Medal. (Then later he claims I had been
claiming all along that I already had one - obviously Brooks has been
caught in another lie).

So why would Nigel and Dai Uy want to "help" me try to obtain a Purple
Heart Medal if they really believed I was claiming I already had
one? They knew the only "Purple Heart" I ever referenced was a
"Purple Heart Card" that the VA used to issue.

This is especially true when you count the number of times Dai Uy,
Brooks and the gang has subsequent to Dai Uy's and Nigel's offer to
help me obtain a Purple Heart Medal posted a: " Doug Says: "I have a
purple heart also..." copy of a post that was NOT written nor posted
by me, but was clearly written and posted by a poster by the name of
"Chip."

Yet even after Nigel Brooks and Dai Uy and other gang members stated
that I did not have a purple heart, and never said I did therefore
they were willing to help me obtain one, the Nigel Brooks gang
suddenly and repeatedly attempted to pan that copy posted by a Chip
poster off as something I wrote, and not something "Chip" wrote.


That particular Doug Grant account post was also removed from Google
archives very soon after it was erroneously posted by one of our
typists as it clearly contained an error. And that specific error was
explained to Google when it was requested to be removed. Once Google
was notified of the error, Google agreed it should be removed and
subsequently authorized its removal due to that said error. (Google
must approve all requests for post archive removal and a reason must
be provided for the request to remove).

Moreover, as soon as the error in thread 17 was identified, it was
removed from Groogle archives (long before Brooks even mentioned a
Purple Heart Medal in my respect ) just like all erroneous posts are
supposed to be removed. Google offers a removal service for that
precise reason, and has said that about 28,000 such posts have already
been removed under this service - and members of the Brooks gang have
already removed several of their posts as well.

Everyone knows that errors will be made in posts especially when
typists are being used to post dictation, and those errors should be
removed as soon as they are identified.

Moreover, what Chip said I said in the context Brooks is presenting is
not true, I did not post it nor write it, and it is not complete and
it is out of context. So the gang's reliance on posting "forged
copies" to try and falsely misrepresent that I made one single claim
to have a Purple Heart Medal, which is something I clearly did not
say, and in fact I said the exact opposite dozens of times (before and
after the copied forgery the Brook's gang is using to defame)
represents clear and unmistakable malicious fraud, false accusations
and obloquy for the deliberate purpose of harassment, defamation and
stalking, and to deliberately cause me extreme emotional distress,
which is clearly the Brooks' gang's objective.

Moreover, if someone was claiming he had a Purple Heart Medal there
would be many more posts than just a single badly forged copy written
by someone else to prove it.

Even Inspector Cluso knows about "corroboration" - but the only
corroboration that exists in respect to this matter is all those
posts in which I say I did NOT have a Purple Heart Medal - and dozens
of those no Purple Heart Medal posts exists including a written
history of my military records submitted to the courts and our lawyers
which was completed long before Nigel Brooks even knew my name.

(Note that Nigel Brooks and his Brownies all carefully avoid
mentioning or posting all of those posts in which *I* did write,
before and after the Chip post they claim I wrote and not clearly the
person that appears as the name on the post, that states I DID NOT
have a Purple Heart Medal...why do they avoid all of that overwhelming
evidence? Because they know it will prove them the smear and fraud
merchants I know they are. It seems that providing incomplete,
slanted, biased and fraudulent "evidence" is something that Mr. Brooks
does well, and I cannot help but wonder how many times he has done it
before?

So for the last time, I do not have the Purple Heart Medal, never said
I did, and I also do not have three Victoria Crosses like Nigel Brooks
said he had won in Vietnam, and I also do not have Vietnam Campaign
Medals that Nigel Brooks said he won - but were awarded long after
Nigel Brooks left the US Army, and I also do not have the Silver Star
for being a Medic and simply helping wounded men like I was supposed
to do, and I do not have the Medal of Honor, nor the French Légion
d'Honneur, nor the German Iron Cross either.

So once again, I demand that Nigel Brooks and his gang of smear
merchants cease and desist their false accusations and ridiculous
defaming harassment in respect to this issue and others immediately.

Failure to comply with my cease and dismiss demand can only mean the
Brooks gang is determined to continue to use fraud, false accusations
and outright obloquy for the purpose to cause me extreme emotional
distress much like that Church gang did to the family members of our
fallen servicemen in Iraq.

Doug Grant (Tm)

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages