Received: by 10.182.221.38 with SMTP id qb6mr1743940obc.21.1351803789569;
        Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: mybatis-user@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.182.64.35 with SMTP id l3ls3357302obs.2.gmail; Thu, 01 Nov
 2012 14:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.202.10 with SMTP id ke10mr2106576igc.2.1351803787582;
        Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.202.10 with SMTP id ke10mr2106574igc.2.1351803787549;
        Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <eduardo.macar...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hr6si54402igc.0.2012.11.01.14.03.07
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eduardo.macar...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.182;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eduardo.macar...@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eduardo.macar...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wc20so5102598obb.27
        for <mybatis-user@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=cxwGHhi6uMZzsmjdBHH6Dq31C7SHCSyF+/iCDD9t7JI=;
        b=luZmUcxpFbahOqzl+TMXdzmmeqv4L2pknMnAaUhGTriOcFumEf+q21ZwBIZyLrGLnl
         rKW5Ig84gSp7J4glj6jF1Q5l6Ns4MbYb8Re7fhiDZtFeqKvqoYGZNX+OEXhCrO75Jagt
         00syqqQk1K8hHEoKNPfOcC4lArs4FEeDNMY4uuBvvk0jp8Y79R1lDrRFUyzjt4yJIzeQ
         fWXmI35ZMFHH7g4nYA4P1EwUw3LtlSQA8d6ONoN2lA5WMingoPWbKykB5p64fSY0Tfa6
         Dr6ZAhK9qj1qi1+99hO32Rohv2Esl7Lozb8mtPCHWKMjAjdpstTv0JfASXVRMbnM/lZb
         M72w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.7.225 with SMTP id m1mr36336846oea.122.1351803787402; Thu,
 01 Nov 2012 14:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.251.74 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201203161009.36856.tere...@freemail.hu>
References: <25368396.3408.1330946845018.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynil17>
	<41966fd6-8964-4dd6-a96e-574c07c2f...@w32g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>
	<CADez5SCO9=QMP0F3-JoKsZyK1-VBwHFC9vVoUrwKtfnG3Sc...@mail.gmail.com>
	<201203161009.36856.tere...@freemail.hu>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:03:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAdrJxw+0_KkPoWp3C3vTzNujdRjdnGqE3Yaqy0FbbRvBq1...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: help with caching of 'association' nested select
From: Eduardo Macarron <eduardo.macar...@gmail.com>
To: mybatis-user@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1ef408dde3504cd755882

--e89a8fb1ef408dde3504cd755882
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sorry to revive this old thread but while having a look at the fixed issues
for 3.2.0 I say Gus implemented the inner select chaching and I recall this
discussion.

http://code.google.com/p/mybatis/issues/detail?id=686

It would be great if you could give it a test

--e89a8fb1ef408dde3504cd755882
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sorry to revive this old thread but while having a look at the fixed issues=
 for 3.2.0 I say Gus implemented the inner select chaching and I recall thi=
s discussion.<div><br></div><div><a href=3D"http://code.google.com/p/mybati=
s/issues/detail?id=3D686">http://code.google.com/p/mybatis/issues/detail?id=
=3D686</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><font face=3D"arial, sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-si=
ze:12px">It would be great if you could give it a test</span></font><br><br=
></div>

--e89a8fb1ef408dde3504cd755882--