Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Thought for Week Two
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
tburke28@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options May 17 2007, 2:22 pm
From: "tburk...@gmail.com" <tburk...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:22:28 -0700
Local: Thurs, May 17 2007 2:22 pm
Subject: Thought for Week Two
A "good" nonfiction book for young readers is not what it used to be.
Marc Aronson of SLJ says it just right - there is nonfiction that aims
for "fresh thinking" and nonfiction that is just "dutiful coverage".
Books like the Sibert Award winners are those that go a long way
beyond conveying information.  Still, there are  things about
nonfiction that haven't and shouldn't change.  Nonfiction is
critically evaluated on the basis of accuracy, organization, author
credentials, bibliography, and graphics.  The author's authority
matters a lot.  Getting the facts right is an author's sacred duty and
shows respect for the reader.  Readers have a right to expect that
what they read is accurate and does not include any fact changing or
manufacturing of details to enhance the story.   Good nonfiction books
provide citation lists and acknowledgements for readers to rely on.
The line between fiction and nonfiction must be obvious  It's a given
that a worthy author will make every effort to avoid errors.  It's
much more disturbing when writers add content that they know is not
true or haven't been able to document   This can be a serious problem
as young readers (and even many adults) are not familiar enough with
their subject to be able to discriminate fact from invention.

It's not hard at all to find books for our nonfiction collection.
(My bigger problem is what not to buy.)   I like the books produced by
Greenwood Press, CQ Press, Scholastic, (especially the Franklin Watts
division), and Atheneum are just a few.   The review sources are a
great help - SLJ, Booklist, Horn Book and Publisher's Weekly.   My
school web page has links to many on-line sources that come from YA
Librarians  who are in the know.  Reading Rants ("the out of the
ordinary booklist")  has two nonfiction lists, Reality Bytes (teen
issues) and Inquiring Minds Want to Know (biography) that I  check our
from time to time.  I also ask kids,  teachers, colleagues, and I read
many kinds of catalogs.   I look at the best book awards lists from
ALA/YALSA, and Best Books for Senior High Readers and Best Books for
Young Adult Readers. My most important goal is to find the books  that
bring about new ways of thinking and challenge them to find out more
by provoking new questions.

It took a while to make my choice from our collection of  Sibert Award
winners.  (I do intend to keep going with several others, especially
The Forbidden Schoolhouse and Hitler Youth.)  I eventually decided on
To dance: a ballerina's graphic novel by Siena Cherson Siegel/
Atheneum/ 2006.  To dance was an honor book for 2006.

At first glance, it wouldn't seem to fit the category of  an
"informational book".   To dance is  a memoir in a graphic novel
format.  It's  a  personal account of a young girl from the age of  6
to 18 and her deep passion for dance.  "Dancing fills a space in me,"
she writes.   After reading, I see that this story does satisfy the
definition of the Sibert Committee, ("written and illustrated to
present, organize, and interpret documentable, factual material") but
it's a whole lot more.  To dance presents elements of the ballet life
through the voice of Siena Siegel.   The reader is introduced to the
School of American Ballet, the New York City Ballet, George
Balanchine, the Bolshoi Ballet, and Maya Plisetskaya, who is Siena's
first and enduring inspiration.  We learn a bit about  the story lines
of ballets like The Dying Swan, Pierrette, Harlequinade, and
Giselle.  We  meet great ballet personalities such as  Baryshnikov,
Diane Farrell, and Gelsey Kirkland.  We get a taste of backstage life
and what it's like to rehearse for and perform at Lincoln Center.  To
dance gives us a peek into a specific time in the history of ballet
through one dancer's experience.

While this is all completely wonderful, it is  the way To dance
"elucidates, clarifies, and enlivens its subject." (Sibert Committee)
that distinguishes this book .  The essence of To dance is its
orginality.   The watercolor and ink artwork was created by Siena's
husband, Mark Siegel.    The graphic novel format is  a fresh and very
effective presentation style  for depicting the details of  Siena's
life.  The panel illustrations  enable  us to visualize Sienna in
multiple settings -- ballet class,  rehearsing, performing,  as well
as in her everyday life at school and at home.  Siegel uses the image
of ballet shoe ribbons to link each new section of the story to
dancing.  This book did everything right.  The Sibert Committee
thought so, as well.

(My apologies for not being able to underline or italicize in this
program.  I'll try to figure out how by next time.  It's enough to
drive a librarian mad!)

.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "{MW Nonfiction} Thought for Week Two" by Beth Gallaway
Beth Gallaway  
View profile  
 More options Jun 2 2007, 5:24 pm
From: "Beth Gallaway" <informationgoddes...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 17:24:48 -0400
Local: Sat, Jun 2 2007 5:24 pm
Subject: Re: {MW Nonfiction} Thought for Week Two
I think you got your points across just fine without underlining - or
italicizing... or do you mean the titles?

_To Dance_ or "To Dance" would be more than acceptable. Your review of
To Dance is excellent, thanks.

On 5/17/07, tburk...@gmail.com <tburk...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
___
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
Beth Gallaway, Library Trainer / Consultant
cell/text: 603.247.3196
AOL IM:  rimeswith0range
Skype: informationgoddess29
website: http://informationgoddess29.com

day job:
Metrowest MA Regional Library System
135 Beaver Street, Waltham MA 02452
781-398-1819 fax 781-398-1821
http://www.mmrls.org


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google