Typo in type definition for mo:duration

31 views
Skip to first unread message

Nicholas J Humfrey

unread,
Aug 8, 2012, 7:49:16 AM8/8/12
to music-ontology-sp...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

I have started working on (another!) HTML specification generator:
https://github.com/njh/phpspecgen

While I was testing it on the Music Ontology, I noticed a bug in the
definition for mo:duration:

<rdf:Description rdf:about="duration">
<rdfs:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#DatatypeProperty"/>
</rdf:Description>

I think that should be 'rdf:type' instead!


nick.


Bob Ferris

unread,
Aug 8, 2012, 7:57:27 AM8/8/12
to music-ontology-sp...@googlegroups.com
Hi Nick,

thanks a lot for reporting this issue. I've created an new issue for
this at the MO github repo so far, see
https://github.com/motools/musicontology/issues/8

Cheers,


Bo

Yves Raimond

unread,
Aug 8, 2012, 8:45:47 AM8/8/12
to music-ontology-sp...@googlegroups.com

Thanks for that!

I am wondering whether we could move the current specification generation workflow to your new library when it is ready? The old one is starting to be a bit dated now :)

Best,
Yves

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Music Ontology Specification Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to music-ontology-sp...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to music-ontology-specific...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group?hl=en.

Nicholas Humfrey

unread,
Aug 8, 2012, 2:24:38 PM8/8/12
to music-ontology-sp...@googlegroups.com
Yup, that would be cool.

What are your requirements for a specification generator?

The music ontology special 'level' property - could that be generalised, so it isn't specific to the music ontology?

Does it belong in something like VANN?

nick.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages