Received: by 10.36.145.2 with SMTP id s2mr4202329nzd.1173392158823;
        Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:15:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <jahr...@gmail.com>
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h49si270932nzf.2007.03.08.14.15.58;
        Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:15:58 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jahr...@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 40so1245542uga
        for <music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:15:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=Q5NfAvtcR09qfeEltTxa5y3VYS9GRPMxCS3ezywPjqX/ykcQJtNUU1AyurBvo24/OfdC/2t3N9TjGJffWPxD2kDUTPEnvQBxhp+Yf6cizPuECrzP4+JLCx6bhgrdw5iUx0UTmeNtWxZGFfU+890GrlJDF9MAP/sBtzbNib/yRlQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=s38Lji1qM4ldTC5k2puEnLF1rqGzUtVhBmgzKUa7wHxceC3+rFW7v088zpclK8gUuOGoVzimvlXof0k6Uj9eTFr/fphSEdzn8xXxj8w0L+0a4w5cPoSBjKpWme3jwchkPDAumYusv0WBwBCkJ35cz8GafveJNRCFs0+GUXPu9Vo=
Received: by 10.114.211.1 with SMTP id j1mr301376wag.1173392157349;
        Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.115.94.4 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <832f8b530703081415x40acb5dbg45cef524fe4a349d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:15:57 +0100
From: florent <jahr...@gmail.com>
To: music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Last.fm and pandora data to Music Ontology
In-Reply-To: <C758DF305837284A8DA71883046BC74E02BEF7B4@bbcxue219.national.core.bbc.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_235945_32907347.1173392157313"
References: <1173376763.940247.91...@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
	 <C758DF305837284A8DA71883046BC74E02BEF...@bbcxue219.national.core.bbc.co.uk>

------=_Part_235945_32907347.1173392157313
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 3/8/07, Michael Smethurst <Michael.Smethu...@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> That rocks
>
> I'm doing a similarish mashup with vcs[1]
> Hacking together an app that listens for track playing notifications
> from vcs and uses the mb track api to bring back artist, track and
> release ids
>
> Unfortunately vcs only has artist, composer, track title, label and cat
> # ~ enough to do music reporting but no release title!?!
> We've got a local install of brainz ~ one option we're considering is
> rewriting the lucene indexing to index cat #s... Or just changing vcs.
> Anybody got any thoughts on the coverage of cat #s in brainz? I know the
> model has changed pretty recently


Just fast answer : if you're speaking about catalogue number associated to
label and release, it should arrive in MB as soon are the label stuff goes
to prod (normally and hopefully quite soon)

++
florent

------=_Part_235945_32907347.1173392157313
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/8/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Michael Smethurst</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:Michael.Smethu...@bbc.co.uk">Michael.Smethu...@bbc.co.uk</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>That rocks<br><br>I&#39;m doing a similarish mashup with vcs[1]<br>Hacking together an app that listens for track playing notifications<br>from vcs and uses the mb track api to bring back artist, track and<br>release ids
<br><br>Unfortunately vcs only has artist, composer, track title, label and cat<br># ~ enough to do music reporting but no release title!?!<br>We&#39;ve got a local install of brainz ~ one option we&#39;re considering is<br>
rewriting the lucene indexing to index cat #s... Or just changing vcs.<br>Anybody got any thoughts on the coverage of cat #s in brainz? I know the<br>model has changed pretty recently</blockquote><div><br>Just fast answer : if you&#39;re speaking about catalogue number associated to label and release, it should arrive in MB as soon are the label stuff goes to prod (normally and hopefully quite soon)
<br><br>++<br>florent<br></div><br></div><br>

------=_Part_235945_32907347.1173392157313--