Group <music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: nomush <naomiya...@gmail.com>
To: music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <40a1ae57-5375-451f-b151-0dda40c71b6c@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <50519186.6010102@smiy.org>
References: <a3c80941-f1c4-4627-9ae5-0daf54c1edc4@googlegroups.com> <5051906C.5020804@smiy.org>
 <50519186.6010102@smiy.org>
Subject: Re: Using The Music Ontology for Finding Similar Users
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1599_17775453.1347551540043"

------=_Part_1599_17775453.1347551540043
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1600_16934290.1347551540043"

------=_Part_1600_16934290.1347551540043
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Bo, 

Thank you so much for the quick reply! I'll be sure to check out all the 
examples and try to implement a basic user similarity knowledge base. 
Eventually I think I would like to you the Similarity Ontology since I 
would like to model similarities between artists in order to find deeper 
more meaningful similarities between users and not just whether they liked 
the same artist, but I can start with a more simple task. 

Thanks again, 
Naomi

On Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:55:58 AM UTC-7, Bo Ferri wrote:
>
> Hello again, 
>
> I forgot one good example, see [1]. It's a remodelling of a former 
> example modelled with UMIRL. 
>
> Cheers, 
>
>
> Bo 
>
>
> [1] 
>
> http://purl.org/ontology/cco/cognitivecharacteristics.html#sec-UMIRL-example 
>
> On 09/13/2012 09:51 AM, Bob Ferris wrote: 
> > Hi Naomi, 
> > 
> > to model a user's music preferences you could utilise the Cognitive 
> > Characteristics Ontology (CCO) [1] as well. There is also an example 
> > that deals with music preferences in the documentation of CCO, see [2]. 
> > If have all your required knowledge in your knowledge base you could 
> > write SPARQL queries to get what you need (similarities between users). 
> > You'll maybe even do not need the Similarity Ontology at the beginning. 
> > This might be a further enhanced of your similarity algorithm. You could 
> > utilise it for modelling similarities between music artists, or songs, 
> ... 
> > 
> > Cheers, 
> > 
> > 
> > Bo 
> > 
> > 
> > [1] purl.org/ontology/cco/core# 
> > [2] 
> > 
> http://purl.org/ontology/cco/cognitivecharacteristics.html#sec-simple-music-preferences-example 
>

------=_Part_1600_16934290.1347551540043
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Bo,&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>Thank you so much for the quick reply! I'll be sure to check out all the examples and try to implement a basic user similarity knowledge base. Eventually I think I would like to you the Similarity Ontology since I would like to model similarities between artists in order to find deeper more meaningful similarities between users and not just whether they liked the same artist, but I can start with a more simple task.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks again,&nbsp;</div><div>Naomi</div><div><br>On Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:55:58 AM UTC-7, Bo Ferri wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">Hello again,
<br>
<br>I forgot one good example, see [1]. It's a remodelling of a former 
<br>example modelled with UMIRL.
<br>
<br>Cheers,
<br>
<br>
<br>Bo
<br>
<br>
<br>[1] 
<br><a href="http://purl.org/ontology/cco/cognitivecharacteristics.html#sec-UMIRL-example" target="_blank">http://purl.org/ontology/cco/<wbr>cognitivecharacteristics.html#<wbr>sec-UMIRL-example</a>
<br>
<br>On 09/13/2012 09:51 AM, Bob Ferris wrote:
<br>&gt; Hi Naomi,
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt; to model a user's music preferences you could utilise the Cognitive
<br>&gt; Characteristics Ontology (CCO) [1] as well. There is also an example
<br>&gt; that deals with music preferences in the documentation of CCO, see [2].
<br>&gt; If have all your required knowledge in your knowledge base you could
<br>&gt; write SPARQL queries to get what you need (similarities between users).
<br>&gt; You'll maybe even do not need the Similarity Ontology at the beginning.
<br>&gt; This might be a further enhanced of your similarity algorithm. You could
<br>&gt; utilise it for modelling similarities between music artists, or songs, ...
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt; Cheers,
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt; Bo
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt;
<br>&gt; [1] <a href="http://purl.org/ontology/cco/core#" target="_blank">purl.org/ontology/cco/core#</a>
<br>&gt; [2]
<br>&gt; <a href="http://purl.org/ontology/cco/cognitivecharacteristics.html#sec-simple-music-preferences-example" target="_blank">http://purl.org/ontology/cco/<wbr>cognitivecharacteristics.html#<wbr>sec-simple-music-preferences-<wbr>example</a>
<br></blockquote></div>
------=_Part_1600_16934290.1347551540043--

------=_Part_1599_17775453.1347551540043--