<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group</id>
  <title type="text">Music Ontology Specification Group Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  The Music Ontology Specification provides main concepts and properties fo describing music (i.e. artists, albums and tracks) on the Semantic Web. This is the mailing list for developers of the Music Ontology and tools and technologies related to it.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/music-ontology-specification-group/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="Music Ontology Specification Group feed"/>
  <updated>2008-07-23T20:26:54Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Yves Raimond</name>
  <email>yves.raim...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-23T20:26:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/9176c38e88af37e2?show_docid=9176c38e88af37e2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/9176c38e88af37e2?show_docid=9176c38e88af37e2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Developing an ID3tag2RDF converter using the Music Ontology</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello! &lt;br&gt; Right, I think I begin to understand what you&#39;re coming at. But you &lt;br&gt; explicitly said you wanted to use your mapper in an &amp;quot;offline&amp;quot; mode? &lt;br&gt; Because if you&#39;re willing to use external URIs, why not just stating &lt;br&gt; something like &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://zitgist.com/music/track/e95e5009-99b3-42d2-abdd-477967233b08&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; mo:published_as &amp;lt;your_mp3&amp;gt;.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Antoine Zimmermann</name>
  <email>antoine.zimmerm...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-23T19:59:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/27fe08b706c95084?show_docid=27fe08b706c95084</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/27fe08b706c95084?show_docid=27fe08b706c95084"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Developing an ID3tag2RDF converter using the Music Ontology</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  As you seem to admit, it is not possible to distinguish between two &lt;br&gt; different releases of the same album (like, between the CD and &lt;br&gt; cassette release). If I understand well, such a specific release is an &lt;br&gt; instance of mo:Record. This is exactly why I advocate NOT mapping the &lt;br&gt; tags of an MP3 to a specific mo:Record.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Yves Raimond</name>
  <email>yves.raim...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-23T18:33:22Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/ba55fe899a6751df?show_docid=ba55fe899a6751df</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/ba55fe899a6751df?show_docid=ba55fe899a6751df"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Developing an ID3tag2RDF converter using the Music Ontology</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello! &lt;br&gt; On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Antoine Zimmermann &lt;br&gt; Well, my only point is that this distinction is not made in ID3! And &lt;br&gt; it looks a bit unachievable to translate things that don&#39;t exist in &lt;br&gt; the initial data format :-) &lt;br&gt; So I completely agree with you: with both a track title and an album &lt;br&gt; name, you can&#39;t make this distinction, so don&#39;t worry about it :-)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Antoine Zimmermann</name>
  <email>antoine.zimmerm...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-23T18:03:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/20c6eb9578fd71fc?show_docid=20c6eb9578fd71fc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/20c6eb9578fd71fc?show_docid=20c6eb9578fd71fc"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Developing an ID3tag2RDF converter using the Music Ontology</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Good. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;If I understand well, it means that the TITLE ought to be mapped to a &lt;br&gt; specific release, like &amp;quot;1997 UK CD release&amp;quot;. Why not the &amp;quot;1981 &lt;br&gt; cassette release&amp;quot;? Why not the vinyl release? And why not the online &lt;br&gt; MP3 release? How can you discriminate between these releases with only &lt;br&gt; a tracktitle and album name?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Yves Raimond</name>
  <email>yves.raim...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-20T12:21:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/aa4cd06838acf53d?show_docid=aa4cd06838acf53d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/aa4cd06838acf53d?show_docid=aa4cd06838acf53d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Developing an ID3tag2RDF converter using the Music Ontology</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello! &lt;br&gt; We have an IRC channel on freenode if you want: #musicontology &lt;br&gt; As I mentioned in my previous email, I don&#39;t really agree. The content &lt;br&gt; of the TITLE field in ID3 is the &amp;quot;as published&amp;quot; title. &lt;br&gt; Agreed &lt;br&gt; Same thing, I don&#39;t really think you need to get in mo:MasterSignal. &lt;br&gt; The content of the ALBUM field relates to the &amp;quot;as published&amp;quot; title
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Antoine Zimmermann</name>
  <email>antoine.zimmerm...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-18T12:56:17Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/d6fe77d1a9c83def?show_docid=d6fe77d1a9c83def</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/655c318266e82a5a/d6fe77d1a9c83def?show_docid=d6fe77d1a9c83def"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Developing an ID3tag2RDF converter using the Music Ontology</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The discussion is getting more and more technical. We are getting very &lt;br&gt; close to an agreement, but it becomes more difficult to point to the &lt;br&gt; subtleties in our slight subsisting disagreements. &lt;br&gt; It would be best if we could actually *talk* about it. I also believe &lt;br&gt; that it could make an interesting paper. Something like &amp;quot;Mapping ID3
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Yves Raimond</name>
  <email>yves.raim...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-17T14:13:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/044facd1cfb5fc7c/391a7f3adaff3b57?show_docid=391a7f3adaff3b57</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/044facd1cfb5fc7c/391a7f3adaff3b57?show_docid=391a7f3adaff3b57"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Artist RDF on bbc.co.uk/music</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello! &lt;br&gt; It looks really nice :-) &lt;br&gt; As a side-note: &lt;br&gt; mo:homepage and mo:member are two new properties susbsuming &lt;br&gt; respectively foaf:homepage and foaf:member. They are in the live OWL &lt;br&gt; ontology, but not yet in the documentation (will be in the next round &lt;br&gt; of revision). &lt;br&gt; Cheers! &lt;br&gt; y
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Nicholas J Humfrey</name>
  <email>n...@aelius.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-17T14:07:21Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/044facd1cfb5fc7c/7816ebf45c6f762b?show_docid=7816ebf45c6f762b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/044facd1cfb5fc7c/7816ebf45c6f762b?show_docid=7816ebf45c6f762b"/>
  <title type="text">Artist RDF on bbc.co.uk/music</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; I am working on getting some RDF on to bbc.co.uk/music. &lt;br&gt; Here is an example of what we plan to start off with: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.aelius.com/njh/tmp/cc197bad-dc9c-440d-a5b5-d52ba2e14234.rdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; At the moment all of this is just MusicBrainz data (apart from the image) &lt;br&gt; but we will be adding more BBCness in the future...
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Yves Raimond</name>
  <email>yves.raim...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-15T14:07:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/2771da16a2c7c16f/9b86eb483704396e?show_docid=9b86eb483704396e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/2771da16a2c7c16f/9b86eb483704396e?show_docid=9b86eb483704396e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Draft of a schema for Level 1</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello! &lt;br&gt; I found another nice diagram (attached) in W.J.A. Verheijen master&#39;s &lt;br&gt; thesis, available at: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://wwwis.win.tue.nl/~ksluijs/material/Verheijen-Master-Thesis-2008.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; (Really interesting thesis, btw) &lt;br&gt; It also shows how some other vocabularies are mixed with MO in the &lt;br&gt; Jamendo RDF (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://dbtune.org/jamendo/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;).
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Yves Raimond</name>
  <email>yves.raim...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-11T14:15:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/36fce41766b78f5c/c77be43c7e362524?show_docid=c77be43c7e362524</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/36fce41766b78f5c/c77be43c7e362524?show_docid=c77be43c7e362524"/>
  <title type="text">Fwd: C4DM Seminar: Wednesday 16th July 16:00 - &quot;Social music meets the Semantic Web&quot;</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello! &lt;br&gt; For those of you around London on Wednesday, Alexandre Passant will &lt;br&gt; give a seminar at Queen Mary. &lt;br&gt; Cheers! &lt;br&gt; y &lt;br&gt; ---------- Forwarded message ---------- &lt;br&gt; meets the Semantic Web&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; To: C4DM Seminars List &amp;lt;seminar-...@elec.qmul.ac.uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; Dear all, &lt;br&gt; At 16:00 on Wednesday 16th July, Alexandre Passant will present a
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Yves Raimond</name>
  <email>yves.raim...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-11T10:59:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/f7c92f5da075aa95/81a522eb5eb23616?show_docid=81a522eb5eb23616</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/f7c92f5da075aa95/81a522eb5eb23616?show_docid=81a522eb5eb23616"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Thoughts about the concepts of the MO, and mapping ID3 tags to MO data</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello Antoine! &lt;br&gt; Ok! I was thinking of MasterSignal for this concept, to be more &lt;br&gt; aligned with the in-progress Musicbrainz schema. What do you think? &lt;br&gt; Subclassing of MusicalManifestation is inherited from the current &lt;br&gt; axiom mo:Track subClassOf mo:Record. &lt;br&gt; I agree it doesn&#39;t make any particular sense (and is weird from an
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Antoine Zimmermann</name>
  <email>antoine.zimmerm...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-11T10:16:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/f7c92f5da075aa95/409c398685ae4e76?show_docid=409c398685ae4e76</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/f7c92f5da075aa95/409c398685ae4e76?show_docid=409c398685ae4e76"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Thoughts about the concepts of the MO, and mapping ID3 tags to MO data</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Ok, so in fact, I believe that what I called Album is in fact a &lt;br&gt; mo:Signal, not a mo:Record. &lt;br&gt; And what I called Release is in fact a mo:Record. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;1) The concepts &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;a) Albums &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Informally, we have the word album which designates 3 different &lt;br&gt; notions. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The album as the result of a recording of a music performance (or
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Yves Raimond</name>
  <email>yves.raim...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-10T16:51:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/2771da16a2c7c16f/6feac90a71e9e344?show_docid=6feac90a71e9e344</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/2771da16a2c7c16f/6feac90a71e9e344?show_docid=6feac90a71e9e344"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Draft of a schema for Level 1</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  One of my neighbors apparently had fun with my wireless router today :-) &lt;br&gt; Everything should be fine now. &lt;br&gt; Cheers! &lt;br&gt; y
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Yves Raimond</name>
  <email>yves.raim...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-10T16:43:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/2771da16a2c7c16f/b1ec575e9cac37da?show_docid=b1ec575e9cac37da</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/2771da16a2c7c16f/b1ec575e9cac37da?show_docid=b1ec575e9cac37da"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Draft of a schema for Level 1</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Arg. My DNS just got hijacked.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Lucas Gonze</name>
  <email>lucas.go...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-10T16:39:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/2771da16a2c7c16f/6ac0007608da327c?show_docid=6ac0007608da327c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group/browse_thread/thread/2771da16a2c7c16f/6ac0007608da327c?show_docid=6ac0007608da327c"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Draft of a schema for Level 1</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I got a 404 on that.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
