Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Music Ontology Specification Group
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Typo in type definition for mo:duration
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Nicholas J Humfrey  
View profile  
 More options Aug 8 2012, 7:49 am
From: "Nicholas J Humfrey" <n...@aelius.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:49:16 +0100
Local: Wed, Aug 8 2012 7:49 am
Subject: Typo in type definition for mo:duration
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Hello,

I have started working on (another!) HTML specification generator:
https://github.com/njh/phpspecgen

While I was testing it on the Music Ontology, I noticed a bug in the
definition for mo:duration:

<rdf:Description rdf:about="duration">
  <rdfs:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#DatatypeProperty"/>
</rdf:Description>

I think that should be 'rdf:type' instead!

nick.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bob Ferris  
View profile  
 More options Aug 8 2012, 7:57 am
From: Bob Ferris <z...@smiy.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 13:57:27 +0200
Local: Wed, Aug 8 2012 7:57 am
Subject: Re: Typo in type definition for mo:duration
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Hi Nick,

thanks a lot for reporting this issue. I've created an new issue for
this at the MO github repo so far, see
https://github.com/motools/musicontology/issues/8

Cheers,

Bo

On 08/08/2012 01:49 PM, Nicholas J Humfrey wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Yves Raimond  
View profile  
 More options Aug 8 2012, 8:45 am
From: Yves Raimond <yves.raim...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 13:45:47 +0100
Local: Wed, Aug 8 2012 8:45 am
Subject: Re: Typo in type definition for mo:duration
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Thanks for that!

I am wondering whether we could move the current specification generation
workflow to your new library when it is ready? The old one is starting to
be a bit dated now :)

Best,
Yves
On Aug 8, 2012 1:49 PM, "Nicholas J Humfrey" <n...@aelius.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nicholas Humfrey  
View profile  
 More options Aug 8 2012, 2:24 pm
From: Nicholas Humfrey <n...@aelius.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:24:38 +0100
Local: Wed, Aug 8 2012 2:24 pm
Subject: Re: Typo in type definition for mo:duration
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Yup, that would be cool.

What are your requirements for a specification generator?

The music ontology special 'level' property - could that be generalised, so it isn't specific to the music ontology?

Does it belong in something like VANN?

nick.

On 8 Aug 2012, at 13:45, Yves Raimond <yves.raim...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google