> This may sound trivial but I am a bit confused about why the property
> mo:made (and its reverse property mo:maker) is not inherited in the
> subclass of mo:MusicArtist.
On a side-note, I don't think mo:maker/made are necessary in MO. Maybe
it is worth deprecating them, and fall back to their superproperties
foaf:maker and foaf:made.
As foaf:made has a foaf:Agent in its domain and that a mo:MusicArtist
is a foaf:Agent, you can apply foaf:made to a music artist.
Cheers!
y
>
> Bests,
> --Koosha
> >
>
I agree that this could be a good candidate for deprecation. (with a
comment that says that we suggest to use foaf:maker :) )
Take care,
Fred
> Hi,
> I am new to the Music Ontology. I can only find foaf:made in
> http://www.musicontology.com/ am I missing mo:made?
> I made my ontology from http://purl.org/ontology/mo/. Am I working on
> the same Music Ontology that you refer to?
You're absolutely right - this has been fixed ages ago, actually :-(
I was mixing things up with mo:member. There is indeed no
mo:maker/mo:made since about a year :-)
Really really sorry about the confusion
Koosha, might that answer your problem? There's simply no mo:made in
MO. You should be using foaf:maker/made instead.
Cheers!
y