> ah. it all becomes clear.
> seems ok to me.
> - samer.
> On 10/31/07, Christopher Sutton <chris.sut...@elec.qmul.ac.uk > wrote:
> > seventy3inc...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > > what do you mean by 'associated'?
> > > is it that they tend to produce music within that genre?
> > > In that case it would make more sense to have a property of the person
> > > pointing to the genre.
> > > What is the meaning of the 'subject' property of a genre?
> > > S.
> > I think there was a capitalisation mistake here.
> > I believe Kurt's asking whether you can use the mo:genre *property* with
> > a foaf:Agent as the subject, eg.
> > :me a mo:SoloMusicArtist .
> > gen:Rock a mo:Genre .
> > :me mo:genre gen:Rock .
> > hth,
> > c
> > > On 10/31/07, *Kurt J* < kur...@gmail.com <mailto:kur...@gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I want to express that a foaf:Person is associated w/ a mo:Genre.
> > > Can a foaf:Agent be the subject of a mo:Genre ? Can the spec be
> > > changed to accommodate this?
> > > cheers,
> > > Kurt J