I'm another developer and I'm also looking forward to integrating this data. (Of course this means my replies below don't speak for the MTA.)
> - the StationEntrances.csv file doesn't include the "stop_id" values
> from the GTFS data. In order to relate the entrances to the geocoded
> stop locations from GTFS we'll need the IDs. Without the unique IDs
> we'll have to rely on the station name, which is not only imprecise
> but it appears that the names in both files are different.
Since they're two separate databases, trying to include GTFS stop_id values could get thorny if those ever change--as they well might. It should be trivial to match by using the lines that service each stop, as well as geographical location (latitude/longitude, except for the occasional case when stops overlap).
> - the station entrance file includes the "Division". Can this be
> included in the GTFS data as well? Since NYCT organizes information
> by division, it might be helpful for developers and the general public
> to be able to organize and analyze data in this way too.
This has more to do with routes than stops. Seems useful, but also easy to compile on your own since there are only around 20 routes.
> - the "Line" field refers to the "line segment of the station". How
> does this relate to either the routes, trips, and/or shapes data in
> GTFS.
It has more to do with the conceptual naming of tracks than anything in GTFS data. For example, the 2/3 is primarily the "7th Avenue Express", but also runs on segments called Eastern Parkway, Clark Street, New Lots, etc. etc. As far as I know this data is not encapsulated in GTFS.
> - the lat/lon values have implied decimal places. Obviously it's easy
> enough for us to add the decimal places in order to actually display
> the entrances on a map, but it would save us a step if MTA included
> the decimals in the first place :)
Agreed on this point.
Adam
GTFS stop_ids for the subway don't change, because they're some sort of
internal ID that the MTA's systems use. You'll note that some Q stops
are listed as D## -- that's because what's now the Q used to be the D
(roughly). If the stop_ids haven't changed in that long, they're not
likely to change in the future.
I'm hoping that one day this data will be part of the GTFS, and I'm
working on a proposal to make that happen. See this thread:
https://groups.google.com/group/gtfs-changes/browse_thread/thread/241013e6216a0256?hl=en
I know that this is a complicated proposal, but it is designed so that
only the relevant pieces need be implemented. Since it's not an
official part of GTFS yet, I can understand why the MTA wouldn't want to
jump in yet. But if others support this goal, supporting (or improving)
the proposal would be a good way to do that.
Hi Sarah,
Is this just the subway entrances? What I mean by this, are the Grand Central Terminal entrances included in the dataset? For instance, Vanderbilt ramp, Hyatt cross passage, 48st passages, Helmsley passages.
Same question for my friends at LIRR for Penn Station and Atlantic Terminal.
On Jul 6, 2010 11:16 AM, "Samuel Wong" <samwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Michael,
Thanks for confirming. West 4th was IND before using the storage yard north of the sta prior to having the 6th Avenue Express.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Michael B. Justice <michael....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> West ...
John,
The file includes any entrance dedicated to the subway – for Grand Central, that includes 16 entrances; I believe all of them come in from the street and do not travel through the MNR system elements, such as the Helmsley passages.
Sarah
From: mtadevelop...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:mtadevelop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John L
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 8:25 AM
To: mtadevelop...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [MTAdev] Re: Station Entrance Locations
Hi Sarah,