Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

D/L Binaries

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Old Codger

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 12:34:32 AM11/25/09
to
I subscribe to several photography NG and often the pictures are split
into two files. I can't find a way to combine the parts into one whole
picture again. Help?

Old Codger

Ken Whiton

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 4:05:30 AM11/25/09
to
*-* On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, at 22:34:32 -0700,
*-* In Article <rbydnbUcOaR0XJHW...@mozilla.org>,
*-* Old Codger wrote
*-* About D/L Binaries

> I subscribe to several photography NG and often the pictures are
> split into two files. I can't find a way to combine the parts into
> one whole picture again. Help?

http://edmullen.net/Mozilla/moz_combine.php

The procedure described there is quite cumbersome. A better way,
IMO, is to use a binary-capable newsreader for binary posts,
especially multi-part ones. There are many such newsreaders
available. Personally, I use Xnews (<http://xnews.newsguy.com/>).

Ken Whiton
--
FIDO: 1:132/152
InterNet: kenw...@surfglobal.net.INVAL (remove the obvious to reply)

Ron Hunter

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 6:19:38 AM11/25/09
to
On 11/25/2009 3:05 AM, Ken Whiton wrote:
> *-* On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, at 22:34:32 -0700,
> *-* In Article<rbydnbUcOaR0XJHW...@mozilla.org>,
> *-* Old Codger wrote
> *-* About D/L Binaries
>
>> I subscribe to several photography NG and often the pictures are
>> split into two files. I can't find a way to combine the parts into
>> one whole picture again. Help?
>
> http://edmullen.net/Mozilla/moz_combine.php
>
> The procedure described there is quite cumbersome. A better way,
> IMO, is to use a binary-capable newsreader for binary posts,
> especially multi-part ones. There are many such newsreaders
> available. Personally, I use Xnews (<http://xnews.newsguy.com/>).
>
> Ken Whiton

I do also. The TB developers have made it pretty clear that they will
never support multi-part binaries in newsgroups.

RioBORG

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 10:23:16 AM11/28/09
to
Ron Hunter escreveu:
Not giving what customers want is the first step for a big failure.

Jay Garcia

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 12:58:03 PM11/28/09
to
On 28.11.2009 09:23, RioBORG wrote:

--- Original Message ---

Whatever the customer wants if not doable then find another application
that will.

--
Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion
www.ufaq.org
Netscape - Flock - Firefox - Thunderbird - Seamonkey Support

Ron Hunter

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 4:39:30 PM11/28/09
to
I doesn't look like there are enough people who really care about this
to affect the devs. I suspect they are 'old school' USENET guys who
believe binaries have no place in newsgroups.

Ron Hunter

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 4:41:22 PM11/28/09
to
But they ARE doable. The horrifying thing is that most of the
functionality USED to be in Netscape, and then was removed! UGLY.
Reminds me of Congress paying millions of dollars to make sure the Super
Collider project couldn't be revived by filling the hole with concrete!

Leonidas Jones

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 4:45:58 PM11/28/09
to
Ron Hunter wrote:
> On 11/28/2009 11:58 AM, Jay Garcia wrote:
>> On 28.11.2009 09:23, RioBORG wrote:
>>
>> --- Original Message ---
>>
>>> Ron Hunter escreveu:
>>>> On 11/25/2009 3:05 AM, Ken Whiton wrote:
>>>>> *-* On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, at 22:34:32 -0700,
>>>>> *-* In Article<rbydnbUcOaR0XJHW...@mozilla.org>,
>>>>> *-* Old Codger wrote
/snip/

>>
> But they ARE doable. The horrifying thing is that most of the
> functionality USED to be in Netscape, and then was removed! UGLY.
> Reminds me of Congress paying millions of dollars to make sure the Super
> Collider project couldn't be revived by filling the hole with concrete!
>

I don't think it was available in any gecko based version of Netscape,
which would be 6 and up. Anything before that was a completely
different code base, so it isn't fair to say anything was removed, it
was all built from the ground up, and made to resemble the old Netscape
versions.

As to how easy or difficult it would be to add it in, I have no idea. I
don't think there ever was any intention for TB to be anything other
then a very basic newsreader, complementing its mail.

Lee

Ron Hunter

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 4:59:45 PM11/28/09
to
The functionality allowed making a single file, which the user named,
from several messages, which could then be decoded easily. That
functionality wasn't in the next release, so from a user's viewpoint, it
was removed. Frankly, that functionality isn't difficult to implement
as all the necessary code is already present. Ergo, they don't WANT to
be able to do that.

0 new messages