Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
mozilla.support.seamonkey
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion 2.8 Graphics (.jpg) display change?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David E. Ross  
View profile  
 More options Apr 1 2012, 1:27 pm
Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey
From: "David E. Ross" <nob...@nowhere.invalid>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:27:52 -0700
Local: Sun, Apr 1 2012 1:27 pm
Subject: Re: 2.8 Graphics (.jpg) display change?
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On 4/1/12 5:34 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:

> Rufus wrote:
>> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>> Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>>>> Philip TAYLOR wrote:
>>>>> Despite
>>>>> having been a subscriber to this mailing list for quite
>>>>> some time, I have no recollection of the Seamonkey team
>>>>> ever saying "We are considering doing so-and-so for
>>>>> a future release, and would be interested to learn how
>>>>> the user community feel about it".

>>>> In this case it was a by design *core* change that caused it. And as
>>>> such we did not come to the *SeaMonkey* user community to explicitly ask
>>>> about it.

>>>> Though in *theory* we could override the core choice here, I don't see a
>>>> strongly compelling reason to do so.

>>> I'll give you one, "print screen." Without the extension installed you
>>> really kind of have to actually save the image and use another tool to
>>> print, since the black border is ugly, and printer ink is even more
>>> expensive than gasoline.

>> What happens if the user selects "Print" instead of "Print Screen"?

> I had that though as well, but only after I had painfully returned to an older
> version for other reasons. Hopefully someone can tell us, I don't have a spare
> place to move back to 2.8 a test right now.

With the Old Default Image Style extension disabled, I went to my own
<http://www.rossde.com/garden/garden_bloom.html>.  I selected the photo
of the 'Mt. Hood' white daffodil, right-clicked, and selected View Image
in the pull-down context menu.  The image appeared in the center of the
window with a black background.

On the SeaMonkey menu bar, I selected [File > Page Setup].  On the Page
Setup dialogue popup, I made sure the Options: Print Background checkbox
was not checked.

When I printed with color, the image appeared in the upper-left corner
of the page with a white (or no) background.

--

David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google