Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Vast SiteREF: Performance Difference between Firefox, Chrome and Safari

Received: by 10.66.87.234 with SMTP id bb10mr9591437pab.36.1351531608707;
        Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Path: s9ni68050pbb.0!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:26:48 -0500
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:26:56 -0500
From: Ron Hunter <rphun...@charter.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: mozilla.support.firefox
Subject: Re: Vast SiteREF:  Performance Difference between Firefox, Chrome
 and Safari
References: <89SdnY2Lt6oR4RDNnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@mozilla.org> <zdSdnVSnEYQ_uRPNnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@mozilla.org> <wMqdnb9WzrnipxPNnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@mozilla.org> <PPWdnZB7q-VHABPNnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@mozilla.org> <JMKdnRJ38bkyPBPNnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@mozilla.org>
In-Reply-To: <JMKdnRJ38bkyPBPNnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@mozilla.org>
Message-ID: <fZWdnSK6LJ_FIRPNnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@mozilla.org>
Lines: 43
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.91.164.187
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: sv3-h7fCA2mydFXFv/3HMgATeN5PQy/kSZlfXiFjr48EM+dAjEdUu2SicWtrdMN3VEcCnWhSo66nX1uZurb!gR7uI8CnKgbr2VyB0DT+/QWyoUsupx65IZalMhpqzlY9sDSINRCLOFFdpkmMojWrsAyPPKLlMIkC!2Ha71i+BtVR9
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mozilla.org
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3270
X-Original-Bytes: 3209
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/29/2012 10:33 AM, WaltS wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 11:16 AM, Ron Hunter wrote:
>> On 10/29/2012 3:12 AM, Sailfish wrote:
>>> My bloviated meandering follows what Ron Hunter graced us with on
>>> 10/28/2012 11:39 PM:
>>>> On 10/28/2012 1:42 PM, Sailfish wrote:
>>>>> REF: http://mrdoob.com/lab/javascript/threejs/css3d/periodictable/
>>>>>
>>>>> Environment: i7 2600K, 8GB RAM, ATI HD 6800 series graphics card
>>>>> Browsers: Fx 17.0b3, Chrome 22.0.1229.94, Safari 5.1.7
>>>>>
>>>>> This referenced site is dog slow (even with Hardware Acceleration
>>>>> enabled) using Firefox (and even crashes Firefox when I select the
>>>>> GRID
>>>>> option.) However, the site works swimmingly when using either
>>>>> Chrome or
>>>>> Safari.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect it's a Javascript issue but, honestly, the performance
>>>>> difference seems to be an order of magnitude in difference, at least.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ideas?
>>>>>
>>>> I see the same, except it doesn't crash on 'grid' here.  Definitely
>>>> something going on with the Javascript.
>>>>
>>> Yeah, the difference is so dramatic, it makes me question all of the
>>> recent proclamations about the strides Mozilla has made in Javascript
>>> performance improvements.
>>>
>>> With the number of confirmation here, I've filed a bug:
>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=806295
>>>
>> Is it Javascript, or HTML5?  At least Firefox manages to make a try at
>> it, unlike Opera, and IE9, which do NOTHING.
>>
>
> The Doctype used is the HTML5 Doctype, with the content in the Body
> element mostly JavaScript.
>
That may lead to a solution.  Maybe the two functions aren't 
communicating well, or playing nice with the processor time.