Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Trivia to be filed under the heading of "useless but funny information on Firefox dictionary":

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Geoffrey Hyde

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 7:08:29 AM11/23/09
to
Apparently, Firefox doesn't recongize "donut" as a proper word. Go figure.

I wonder what other common words Firefox doesn't recognize?


Cheers ...

Geoffrey Hyde

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 7:36:52 AM11/23/09
to
Geoffrey Hyde wrote:

> Apparently, Firefox doesn't recongize "donut" as a proper word. Go
> figure.

Perhaps down there in Oz, "donut" isn't a proper word? :-)
Here in the U.S., my copy of Firefox 3.0.15 approves "donut" but oddly
enough does not approve of "doughnut"...

> I wonder what other common words Firefox doesn't recognize?

What does yours do for (British) English words such as:

humor | humour

For me, humor is okay, but humour is not.

--
-bts
-Friends don't let friends drive Windows

Ron Hunter

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 7:37:17 AM11/23/09
to
LOTS. That's what the 'personal dictionary' is for.

Swifty

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 9:59:18 AM11/23/09
to
Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
> Apparently, Firefox doesn't recongize "donut" as a proper word. Go figure.
>
> I wonder what other common words Firefox doesn't recognize?

I'm more worried by the words that *are* accepted, after sending my
manager an email suggesting that he may have a problem with his "poser"
supply. (power)

--
Steve Swift
http://www.swiftys.org.uk/swifty.html
http://www.ringers.org.uk

Ron Hunter

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 3:31:10 PM11/23/09
to
On 11/23/2009 8:59 AM, Swifty wrote:
> Geoffrey Hyde wrote:
>> Apparently, Firefox doesn't recongize "donut" as a proper word. Go
>> figure.
>>
>> I wonder what other common words Firefox doesn't recognize?
>
> I'm more worried by the words that *are* accepted, after sending my
> manager an email suggesting that he may have a problem with his "poser"
> supply. (power)
>
NO spell-checker can tell what you meant, and that is a 'poser'. Grin.

Beauregard T. Shagnasty

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 4:59:51 PM11/23/09
to
Ron Hunter wrote:

Does your computer have a poseur supply?

Swifty

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:32:56 AM11/24/09
to
Ron Hunter wrote:
> NO spell-checker can tell what you meant, and that is a 'poser'. Grin.

Not quite 100% true. Word 2003 (the version I have) allows you to remove
words from the standard dictionary (by creating an exception dictionary)
and I've used this to mark "poser" as a spelling mistake. It's never
been wrong to date.

Ron Hunter

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:07:43 AM11/24/09
to
On 11/24/2009 4:32 AM, Swifty wrote:
> Ron Hunter wrote:
>> NO spell-checker can tell what you meant, and that is a 'poser'. Grin.
>
> Not quite 100% true. Word 2003 (the version I have) allows you to remove
> words from the standard dictionary (by creating an exception dictionary)
> and I've used this to mark "poser" as a spelling mistake. It's never
> been wrong to date.
>
And what would you call 'one who poses'? And PLEASE don't give me the
French word.

John Doue

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:15:08 AM11/24/09
to
Swifty wrote:
> Ron Hunter wrote:
>> NO spell-checker can tell what you meant, and that is a 'poser'. Grin.
>
> Not quite 100% true. Word 2003 (the version I have) allows you to remove
> words from the standard dictionary (by creating an exception dictionary)
> and I've used this to mark "poser" as a spelling mistake. It's never
> been wrong to date.
>
This is getting OT but you are luckier than I am if the .EXC file works
reliably for you ... Here, it is totally unreliable.

--
John Doue

Greywolf

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 8:38:46 AM11/24/09
to

"Poser" also means "riddle".

wolf k.

David McRitchie

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:19:43 PM11/24/09
to
"Ron Hunter" ...

You missed the point. Swiftly knows that in his normal usage he would not use
"poser" because the word wanted would almost always be "poster". A similar
item for me for our SOP (Standard Operating Procedures Manual) was to
eliminate "discus" because we have no need for that word and the wanted
word would be "discuss". I had to add over 7,000 common words and some
specific to Information Systems Operation to our dictionary back then. We also
added/deleted temporary words for individual procedures. It is so much nicer now
when dictionaries start with a complete real dictionary rather than picking the
the most common nn,nnn words.

If anyone is having a problem using the Firefox dictionary, see "Spell Checker" in
http://www.mvps.org/dmcritchie/firefox/tab_capacity/001_with_underscore.htm
including getting Firefox into edit mode with a bookmarklet so you can check
spelling on any page. A big help if you use notepad to create your web pages.

Swifty

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:48:38 PM11/24/09
to
Ron Hunter wrote:
> And what would you call 'one who poses'? And PLEASE don't give me the
> French word.

A "poser" of course. Strangely, I've never come across this use of the
word. A bit like Arthur Dent's house and the word "safe".

Swifty

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:52:15 PM11/24/09
to
David McRitchie wrote:
> You missed the point. Swiftly knows that in his normal usage he
> would not use "poser" because the word wanted would almost always be
> "poster".

Just so. I also remove words like f*ck�, because I use my PC for
business, and cannot imagine ever using that word, but I *did*
accidentally type it recently.

� As in "feckless"

Swifty

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:56:37 PM11/24/09
to
John Doue wrote:
> This is getting OT but you are luckier than I am if the .EXC file works
> reliably for you ... Here, it is totally unreliable.

See http://swiftys.org.uk/images/poser.gif

So far, so good (as the man passing the 40th floor of the Empire State
Building was heard to say�)

I had heard that it was fragile, so I don't tax it much.

Terry R.

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 3:17:08 PM11/24/09
to
On 11/24/2009 2:32 AM On a whim, Swifty pounded out on the keyboard

> Ron Hunter wrote:
>> NO spell-checker can tell what you meant, and that is a 'poser'. Grin.
>
> Not quite 100% true. Word 2003 (the version I have) allows you to remove
> words from the standard dictionary (by creating an exception dictionary)
> and I've used this to mark "poser" as a spelling mistake. It's never
> been wrong to date.
>

WordPerfect allows the same.


Terry R.
--
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

Ron Hunter

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:34:36 PM11/24/09
to
Yep.

Ron Hunter

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:37:09 PM11/24/09
to
I have always been amused that common computerized dictionaries often
fail to include words that are 'computer jargon', such as 'uninstall',
and even names of common programs, like Photoshop.

Joy Beeson

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:10:18 AM11/25/09
to
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:37:09 -0600, Ron Hunter <rphu...@charter.net>
wrote:

> I have always been amused that common computerized dictionaries often
> fail to include words that are 'computer jargon', such as 'uninstall',
> and even names of common programs, like Photoshop.

And it's a rare program that has its own name in its spelling
dictionary.

--
Joy Beeson
joy beeson at comcast dot net

0 new messages