I don't remember this Java Console version proliferation in the past.
Any comments?
--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk
Here's the solution copied from another thread:
On 1/22/2010 9:58 AM eastern, Bernd wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>
>> On 1/21/2010 4:33 PM eastern, Tarkus wrote:
>>> On 1/21/2010 1:17 PM, John Gray wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:25:04 -0800, Wing wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > Java Console 6.0.13
>>>>> > Java Console 6.0.15
>>>>> > Java Console 6.0.17
>>>>> > Java Console 6.0.12
>>>>
>>
>>
>> I've been unable to remove the outdated Java Console versions
manually. Anyone else know how?
>
> You'll find the Java Console(s) in the "extensions" folder under the
Firefox Program folder.
> They have cryptic GUID names like
>
> {CAFEEFAC-0016-0000-0017-ABCDEFFEDCBA}
>
> The 4th part of that GUID contains the Java (Console) version.
> "0017" in the above case.
> Just delete the unwanted versions and restart FF.
>
> Bernd
That does it! I just removed all except 6.0.18. Thanks, Bernd.
--
Ron Hunter -- rphu...@charter.net
Thanks, but under "Add or Remove Programs" I only see "Java 6 Update 17"
and "Java 6 Update 14", not all the other versions listed in the FF 3.6
Add-on window.
What next? Should I simple use the Uninstall option in the FF 3.6 Add-on
window to get rid of the old versions?
In any case, is this some kind of FF 3.6 bug? I don't remember seeing
multiple versions in the past.
--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk
First do a Windows uninstall of U 14 and recheck Fx. If there are remaining
extras, use Explorer to look in Program Files for files in Mozilla Firefox
> Plugins. There may be copies of old NPxxx.dll files. While Fx is
capable of running plugins from file locations in the home location of the
program providing the plugin, some plugins get cloned to the Fx folder too.
--
Ron K.
Who is General Failure, and why is he searching my HDD?
Kernel Restore reported Major Error used BSOD to msg the enemy!
Thanks for your reply.
I uinstalled U 14 as you suggested.
FF no longer lists it in the Add-ons window, but it still lists all the
other old ones.
I have quite a few NPxxx.dll in the Plugins folder, but clearly not all
of them relate to Java.
Interestingly, I don't see all the old versions under about:plugins.
What next?
Should I try uninstalling the old ones via the Uninstall option in the
FF 3.6 Add-on window?
The fact that they are listed there isn't really a problem, of course,
but I don't like this kind of clutter.
--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk
Dave Pyles
> What next?
>
> Should I try uninstalling the old ones via the Uninstall option in the
> FF 3.6 Add-on window?
>
> The fact that they are listed there isn't really a problem, of course,
> but I don't like this kind of clutter.
>
Hi, Herb - Read this recent thread: Extensions added after upgrade to
Firefox 3.6
It contains Bernd's fix which I quoted in my first reply in this thread,
and which is the only way I was able to do *precisely* what you're
trying to do.
BTW, notice that 6.0.18, which you apparently don't have, is the latest.
As a note to the side, the various versions of the Java Console caused
my Firefox to refuse starting in anything but safe mode when I upgraded
from 3.5.7 to 3.6. Disabling all add-ons, then enabling them one by one
(leaving Java Console for last, as the number of versions caught my eye)
revealed that Java was what caused Firefox to misbehave.
Is my guess correct, that those hitting this error should remove
everything but the freshest of the Java Console?
/Teo.
--
Teodor V��n�nen | Don't meddle in the affairs of wizards,
<teostup...@algonet.se> | for you are good and crunchy with
http://www.algonet.se/~teodor/ | ketchup.
Remove stupidity to reply. |
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
>
> Hi, Herb - Read this recent thread: Extensions added after upgrade to
> Firefox 3.6
>
> It contains Bernd's fix which I quoted in my first reply in this thread,
> and which is the only way I was able to do *precisely* what you're
> trying to do.
>
Hi, Cal !
Thank you for your insistent promotion f8r my fix ;-)
Bernd
Hi Cal
Thanks for your message - I had missed your earlier reply.
Bernd's fix does indeed work (all other attempts to rectify the
situation had failed) - thanks for all the replies.
--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk