Received: by 10.68.195.131 with SMTP id ie3mr4647172pbc.8.1335963055872;
        Wed, 02 May 2012 05:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni123473pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: XioNoX <xio...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: mozilla.reps.general
Subject: Re: Community emails
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 05:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <13004527.2337.1335962929713.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbvx4>
References: <29567749.783.1335799791436.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yndd32>
 <CAHwD19M27u6f08tZRm_KS4jwK1sjDybSR1xUyCBsqK-0WN=m5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO6SRHg0QkhW2cKdy9iyo0=7gXC7U4VOtVDapyumQwMy+7BwPA@mail.gmail.com>
 <mailman.24522.1335816764.31724.reps-general@lists.mozilla.org>
 <456411.576.1335818708210.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbuo17>
 <CAN6Lbue8a-ST7YV016sDDddAdUqd9ok4ydgqMfAZWA2wx_TwoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEUZgDshdv3Jav=n-Tdu7ro2+p_ih1e6vZQs=+OMVWE8Fnui-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJiPHJx2rbzQAUWEa2Ke45Tdt7wUsguu0Wxj5WGxNkR6NH9S+g@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.24790.1335949676.31724.reps-general@lists.mozilla.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.218.72.65
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335963055 3897 127.0.0.1 (2 May 2012 12:50:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 12:50:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Mozilla Reps - General <reps-gene...@lists.mozilla.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.24790.1335949676.31724.reps-general@lists.mozilla.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=207.218.72.65;
 posting-account=2HUTtwoAAADfkqR_HQ5L-2nXNhml9C_0
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That's what we're going to do, but my 1st email (and the poll related) is a=
lso to know how many communities would like to "outsource" their email to a=
 shared server, so we can get something big enough.

I asked the dev in charge of reps.mozilla.org if it was possible to extract=
 automatically the list of the reps. He should get back to us here shortly.

On Wednesday, May 2, 2012 10:07:46 AM UTC+1, Ramesh Sahu wrote:
> Hey Nukeador,
> I am totally agree with you :)
>=20
> =A0
> Ramesh Kumar Sahu
> Representative
> Mozilla Reps
> http://www.mozilla.org/contribute
> +91 8904768228
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ________________________________
>  From: Nukeador <nukea...@mozilla-hispano.org>
> To: Mozilla Reps - General <reps-gene...@lists.mozilla.org>=20
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2012 2:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Reps-General] Community emails
> =20
> From my point of view, and I think it was discussed time ago, reps should
> have a @reps.mozilla.org or @mozilla.org email address.
>=20
> Contributors that are not reps should have a @community-domain.org email
> (for example I have a @mozilla-hispano.org email). This can change from o=
ne
> community to another, for example we only give
> @mozilla-hispano.orgaccounts to what we call active or core community
> contributors, not casual
> ones.
>=20
> Ideally mozilla could set up a server for all community-domain emails and
> have the same technology as @mozilla.org emails (zimbra and all stuff).
>=20
> Regards.
> --=20
> Rub=E9n Mart=EDn (Nukeador)
> Mozilla Reps Council member
> http://mozilla-hispano.org
> http://twitter.com/mozilla_hispano
> http://facebook.com/mozillahispano
> _______________________________________________
> reps-general mailing list
> reps-gene...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/reps-general