Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
mozilla . governance
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Find or start a Google Group about governance.
Group info
Group categories: Not categorized
More group info »
Related Groups
Low activity, Usenet
Low activity, Usenet
Low activity, Usenet
Discussions
View:  Topic list, Topic summary Topics 1 - 10 of 158  Older »

Proposed Clarification to Site Licensing Policy 
  Mozilla is proposing to clarify the language in our Site Licensing Policy that explains what elements of the web site are not licensed under the Creative Commons license. This language appears at [link] (and is part of what is underneath the Legal Notices link). It currently states:... more »
By Julie Martin  - Nov 1 - 3 new of 3 messages    

New Activities Modules 
  For a while we have been in the process of identifying "Activities Modules" - non-code activities undertaken by the Mozilla project - and applying the module owner structure to them. [link] The existing Activities Modules are "Governance", "Planet Mozilla" and... more »
By Gervase Markham  - Oct 28 - 16 new of 16 messages    

FYI: Concerns about IPS SERVIDORES root certificate 
  This posting is for informational purposes only. Any follow-up should be posted in the mozilla.dev.security.policy newsgroup in the discussion thread called “Resolving concerns about the IPS SERVIDORES root certificate”. There have recently been some issues in regards to the following root certificate owned by IPS:... more »
By Kathleen Wilson  - Oct 21 - 2 new of 2 messages    

Bugzilla and localizations components/products 
  Hi, we're having two bugs open right now [1] that may or may not merge, and I wonder where the off-the-bug discussion should be. Trying .governance. We may want to have more than one bug component per locale on the one hand, and we have more and more stuff tracked in bugs that's not strictly "Client Software", like website bugs etc.... more »
By Axel Hecht  - Oct 20 - 18 new of 18 messages    

Dormant Accounts - summary 
  Thank you to everyone who contributed to the dormant accounts discussion. The new policy is going to be as follows: "SCM accounts inactive for more than 6 months may be disabled. If your account has been disabled, you can have it re-enabled by <a>filing a bug</a> in mozilla.org/Server Operations: Account Requests. Please make... more »
By Gervase Markham  - Oct 20 - 46 new of 46 messages    

Dormant Accounts 
  I've received a list of all SCM accounts from Mozilla IT, and so have been able to compare it to the output of my "active-accounts.pl" script. Setting the time interval at six months, I get the following statistics (fixed-width font required; note these numbers and percentages are _active_, not _inactive_):... more »
By Gervase Markham  - Oct 8 - 35 new of 35 messages    

Linux distributions offering 64 bit builds of Firefox with official branding 
  Need I really say more ? In my opinion, it's really clear : Official branding => supported by mozilla Not supported by mozilla => No official branding The current situation is impossible to explain to the casual Linux user : - We cant' help you, you're not using a 32 bit build, it's not supported.... more »
By Jean-Marc Desperrier  - Oct 5 - 1 new of 1 message    

titanium ecm2001 crack torrent rapidshare download free gq_gMm<o)v 
  We can crack or emulate any protection type: Dongle, Hardlock, Hasp, Serial, Password, Hasp4, Flexlm, Sentinel, Wibu, Eutron Smartkey, Hasphl, Proteq, All the Protections!! email = xshowsoft@??? email = xshowsoft at gmail.com ecm2001 download ecm2001 rapidshare ecm2001 torrent ecm2001 crack ecm2001 v 5.3... more »
By ecm2001 winols cpwin rapidshare torrent  - Oct 4 - 1 new of 1 message    

Spam on Planet Mozilla? 
  This is what I see in my News Reader ==> [link] However, this is the first time I notice SPAM on Planet Mozilla feed.
By RNiK  - Sep 29 - 5 new of 5 messages    

Monday Meeting changes 
  OK, so if we have some consensus (or lack of objection) around Deb's formulation of the purpose of the meeting (reformulated below): what changes do people think we should make to better meet these goals and aims? Follow-ups to mozilla.governance, please. IMO this has got away from planning. (Or if you aren't a member and joining the group seems like a... more »
By Gervase Markham  - Sep 11 - 6 new of 6 messages    

1 - 10 of 158   « Newer | Older »

XML      
Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google