Received: by 10.66.79.233 with SMTP id m9mr1232761pax.37.1348773189438;
        Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: g9ni528pbh.1!nntp.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:13:08 -0500
Return-Path: <n...@google.com>
X-Original-To: mozilla-governa...@lists.mozilla.org
Delivered-To: mozilla-governa...@lists.mozilla.org
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mozilla.org
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'n...@google.com'
	in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com'
	matched)) receiver=mailman2.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com;
	identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="n...@google.com";
	helo=mail-pa0-f70.google.com; client-ip=209.85.220.70
Newsgroups: mozilla.governance
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.25114.1348762510.27472.governance@lists.mozilla.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.15.76.122;
	posting-account=wDp2ggoAAAA3dRD6akEmzvs6aYf7YRSd
References: <mailman.24985.1348693857.27472.governance@lists.mozilla.org>
	<mailman.25114.1348762510.27472.governance@lists.mozilla.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Mozilla and Public Policy - Draft Framework
From: chef...@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:13:05 +0000
To: mozilla-governa...@lists.mozilla.org
Cc: mozilla-governa...@lists.mozilla.org
X-BeenThere: governa...@lists.mozilla.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the governance and running of the Mozilla project
	<governance.lists.mozilla.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.mozilla.org/options/governance>,
	<mailto:governance-requ...@lists.mozilla.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:governa...@lists.mozilla.org>
List-Help: <mailto:governance-requ...@lists.mozilla.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance>,
	<mailto:governance-requ...@lists.mozilla.org?subject=subscribe>
Approved: governa...@lists.mozilla.org
Message-ID: <mailman.25150.1348773188.27472.governa...@lists.mozilla.org>
Lines: 49
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.245.216.66
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: sv3-DbowTW6EXYYcgdA+ZNgb4Y6BYyZRh9HlCCFDeYmN5/BS9C2b9el8nIIOtTuKh0dVXMg4s3hbYsQ3CGt!pdwhGWDsr3toI3kHyKW6tIPMUeGOeXdr9xtxtbn58uVqWUErUrlqoL/bkRNxQy64VTX9GCVoen83!s4cmjMayI0rytq25HLY/uMqP9BH39MpG
X-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3909
X-Original-Bytes: 3848
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thursday, September 27, 2012 6:34:22 AM UTC-7, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> chef...@gmail.com, 2012-09-26 23:10+0200:
> 
> > Framework: http://www.slideshare.net/chefhja/draft-framework-sep-26
> 
> 
> 
> I think it would be far better to put this framework on an open download
> 
> platform. This one requires to register to download it, which is not
> 
> exactly what I would call open. Any regular Web server would be
> 
> acceptable.
> 
> 
> 
> As a more general comment, I would suggest running the following command
> 
> against this framework:
> 
>     $ sed -i -e s/Web/Internet/i
> 
> 
> 
> In cleartext: I think it would be more relevant to advocate for an open
> 
> Internet rather than just an open Web. Some Internet service providers
> 
> are already turning into Web service providers that greatly restrict
> 
> access to Internet services other than the Web, and this is a huge step
> 
> backwards.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Tanguy


Thanks for the comments. 

1. Internet v. Web. We'll adjust language to reflect Internet v. web. 

2. We will find a spot for download without registration as well. 

/hja